the majority of the republicans don't have FREE SPEECH, either one of many tramp supporters cut them down and desecraters them or tramp himself.
Are you dense ? My post that you quoted, ANSWERED what you are now again posting about. Apparently you're a slow learner, Go back and read Post # 85 over again, maybe this time a little slower. Read it 10 times if need be, but for crying out loud, don't come back with the same nonsense that I just refuted you on.
They ARE telling who to ban. And WHAT to ban. You are brain dead.
Your answer was basically: a yard doesnāt compare to the massive social media. I suggested a really big yard. Your logic is ******* stupid. Your 1st amendment rights donāt allow you to put shit on my property or Facebooks website. Stupid logic.
Haha, now we are talking about the Bidens flagging people?! Wow ur dumb
Most Left Wingers are opposed to Freedom of Speech because the truth destroys them.
Let's take a look at the now becoming famous Politico story that broke the news a few days ago about Biden and the 1st Amendment (free speech). >> āBiden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.ā
Jen Psaki, whose job as press secretary is devoted to making the outlandish sound routine, elaborated on the plan Thursday and confirmed itās already in operation. Within the Surgeon Generalās Office, weāre flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,ā Psaki said. āWeāre working with doctors and medical professionals to connect medical experts with people, who are popular with their audiences, with accurate information and boost trusted content. So, weāre helping get trusted content out there.ā
So the government is not only āflaggingā people it doesnāt like, itās also helping to āboost trusted content.ā
āItās important to take faster action against harmful posts,ā Psaki added. āAs you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes itās not accurate, and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful violative posts.ā
Her words, ānot accurateā and āharmful violative posts,ā are so vague as to give the government an open-ended license to push Facebook and other platforms to censor almost anything somebody in the White House doesnāt like.
Sure, this all starts with disagreements over COVID, but why would it end there? Suppose thereās a story about, oh, letās take a wild stab and say the foreign business interests of the presidentās son that also implicate the president.
Might there be any pressure on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others to block the story from being shared? Does any of this sound familiar? Psaki dug a deeper hole Friday by arguing that people banned from one social media platform should also be banned from others. Her proposal effectively urges the companies to create a unified ban against American citizens.
On top of Bidenās inflammatory accusation, her remarks and the governmentās actions make it clear we are far down the slippery slope.
Thereās already one example of the potential impacts. The Postās expose on Hunter Bidenās laptop last October was blocked by Big Tech for two crucial weeks while voting in the presidential election was underway. Later, a poll found most voters were not aware of the stories, and some 8 percent said they would have voted differently had they known the facts. Most folks might not be seeing how huge this all is.
Thanks to Michael Goodwin at the New York Post for supplying this much of this harrowing information.
Joe Bidenās troubling TECHnique: Goodwin
On Friday, Joe Biden accused Facebook of ākilling peopleā and demanded it silence those opposed to or questioning the coronavirus vaccines. Coming from the president, this is a breathtaking accusatā¦nypost.com
Let's take a look at the now becoming famous Politico story that broke the news a few days ago about Biden and the 1st Amendment (free speech). >> āBiden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.ā
Jen Psaki, whose job as press secretary is devoted to making the outlandish sound routine, elaborated on the plan Thursday and confirmed itās already in operation. Within the Surgeon Generalās Office, weāre flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,ā Psaki said. āWeāre working with doctors and medical professionals to connect medical experts with people, who are popular with their audiences, with accurate information and boost trusted content. So, weāre helping get trusted content out there.ā
So the government is not only āflaggingā people it doesnāt like, itās also helping to āboost trusted content.ā
āItās important to take faster action against harmful posts,ā Psaki added. āAs you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes itās not accurate, and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful violative posts.ā
Her words, ānot accurateā and āharmful violative posts,ā are so vague as to give the government an open-ended license to push Facebook and other platforms to censor almost anything somebody in the White House doesnāt like.
Sure, this all starts with disagreements over COVID, but why would it end there? Suppose thereās a story about, oh, letās take a wild stab and say the foreign business interests of the presidentās son that also implicate the president.
Might there be any pressure on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others to block the story from being shared? Does any of this sound familiar? Psaki dug a deeper hole Friday by arguing that people banned from one social media platform should also be banned from others. Her proposal effectively urges the companies to create a unified ban against American citizens.
On top of Bidenās inflammatory accusation, her remarks and the governmentās actions make it clear we are far down the slippery slope.
Thereās already one example of the potential impacts. The Postās expose on Hunter Bidenās laptop last October was blocked by Big Tech for two crucial weeks while voting in the presidential election was underway. Later, a poll found most voters were not aware of the stories, and some 8 percent said they would have voted differently had they known the facts. Most folks might not be seeing how huge this all is.
Thanks to Michael Goodwin at the New York Post for supplying this much of this harrowing information.
Joe Bidenās troubling TECHnique: Goodwin
On Friday, Joe Biden accused Facebook of ākilling peopleā and demanded it silence those opposed to or questioning the coronavirus vaccines. Coming from the president, this is a breathtaking accusatā¦
It is when the government is directing it.
Should we allow phone companies to control what you say over your phone service?
So Verizon is allowed to control what you say over their service?
How about calling your brother using Verizon?
NOT.
Seriously?
Perhaps, but you're a groveling NAZI douchebag.
Cell phone companies are common carriers. Do you remember when AT&T was a monopoly? They weren't allowed to censor or spy on anyone.
Prog totalitarianism
Bullshit. Tech companies are doing the bidding of the DNC and the White House. Itās fascism, text book fascism.
Excellent.Let's take a look at the now becoming famous Politico story that broke the news a few days ago about Biden and the 1st Amendment (free speech). >> āBiden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.ā
Jen Psaki, whose job as press secretary is devoted to making the outlandish sound routine, elaborated on the plan Thursday and confirmed itās already in operation. Within the Surgeon Generalās Office, weāre flagging posts for Facebook that spread disinformation,ā Psaki said. āWeāre working with doctors and medical professionals to connect medical experts with people, who are popular with their audiences, with accurate information and boost trusted content. So, weāre helping get trusted content out there.ā
So the government is not only āflaggingā people it doesnāt like, itās also helping to āboost trusted content.ā
āItās important to take faster action against harmful posts,ā Psaki added. āAs you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes itās not accurate, and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful violative posts.ā
Her words, ānot accurateā and āharmful violative posts,ā are so vague as to give the government an open-ended license to push Facebook and other platforms to censor almost anything somebody in the White House doesnāt like.
Sure, this all starts with disagreements over COVID, but why would it end there? Suppose thereās a story about, oh, letās take a wild stab and say the foreign business interests of the presidentās son that also implicate the president.
Might there be any pressure on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others to block the story from being shared? Does any of this sound familiar? Psaki dug a deeper hole Friday by arguing that people banned from one social media platform should also be banned from others. Her proposal effectively urges the companies to create a unified ban against American citizens.
On top of Bidenās inflammatory accusation, her remarks and the governmentās actions make it clear we are far down the slippery slope.
Thereās already one example of the potential impacts. The Postās expose on Hunter Bidenās laptop last October was blocked by Big Tech for two crucial weeks while voting in the presidential election was underway. Later, a poll found most voters were not aware of the stories, and some 8 percent said they would have voted differently had they known the facts. Most folks might not be seeing how huge this all is.
Thanks to Michael Goodwin at the New York Post for supplying this much of this harrowing information.
Joe Bidenās troubling TECHnique: Goodwin
On Friday, Joe Biden accused Facebook of ākilling peopleā and demanded it silence those opposed to or questioning the coronavirus vaccines. Coming from the president, this is a breathtaking accusatā¦
