This is a lie.
Again, no regulation has been enacted; social media are not being ‘coerced.’
The Government Speech Doctrine.
‘As an outgrowth of the government subsidy cases, such as
Rust v. Sullivan, the Court has established the “government speech doctrine” that recognizes that
a government entity “is entitled to say what it wishes” and to select the views that it wants to express. In this vein, when the government speaks, the government is not barred by the Free Speech Clause of the
First Amendment from determining the content of what it says and can engage in viewpoint discrimination. The underlying rationale for the government speech doctrine is that the government could not “function” if the government could not favor or disfavor points of view in enforcing a program. And the Supreme Court has recognized that the government speech doctrine even extends to when the government receives private assistance in helping deliver a government controlled message.’
www.law.cornell.edu