Jindal: people are ready for a hostile takeover of D.C.

He is another R who embarrassed himself doing a Republican response to the SOTU. He's popular to Rs and people on political message boards may know him but he will go nowhere in 2016.

I actually agree with Sarah on Jindal.. he's horrible.. I wouldn't vote for him if he ran for President. I think he's a nice man but just not Presidential material. Having said as much, neither is Barack Millhouse Obama.

Rs are going to have to get someone at least as popular as Chris Christie. I hope they do, I love a good presidential race.


Chris Christie is not popular with Conservatives, as in not at all.
 
I actually agree with Sarah on Jindal.. he's horrible.. I wouldn't vote for him if he ran for President. I think he's a nice man but just not Presidential material. Having said as much, neither is Barack Millhouse Obama.

Rs are going to have to get someone at least as popular as Chris Christie. I hope they do, I love a good presidential race.


Chris Christie is not popular with Conservatives, as in not at all.

True but if he shows them he can win, they may come around.
 
He is another R who embarrassed himself doing a Republican response to the SOTU. He's popular to Rs and people on political message boards may know him but he will go nowhere in 2016.

I actually agree with Sarah on Jindal.. he's horrible.. I wouldn't vote for him if he ran for President. I think he's a nice man but just not Presidential material. Having said as much, neither is Barack Millhouse Obama.

Its Milhous, and Obama is no Nixon; Nixon began the fall of the USSR, and started China on the road to "experiments" with free markets. Sadly, he was paranoid; he was only 1 of about 15 people in the US who actually thought McGovern stood a chance in 1972.
 
Rs are going to have to get someone at least as popular as Chris Christie. I hope they do, I love a good presidential race.


Chris Christie is not popular with Conservatives, as in not at all.

True but if he shows them he can win, they may come around.

And we will have another result like we saw with Romney. Conservatives will not support another RINO. Most of us learned our lesson last time.
 
He is another R who embarrassed himself doing a Republican response to the SOTU. He's popular to Rs and people on political message boards may know him but he will go nowhere in 2016.

I actually agree with Sarah on Jindal.. he's horrible.. I wouldn't vote for him if he ran for President. I think he's a nice man but just not Presidential material. Having said as much, neither is Barack Millhouse Obama.

Its Milhous, and Obama is no Nixon; Nixon began the fall of the USSR, and started China on the road to "experiments" with free markets. Sadly, he was paranoid; he was only 1 of about 15 people in the US who actually thought McGovern stood a chance in 1972.

Excuse me..I wasn't born back then..

You're correct.. Obama is not Nixon.. He's much worse.
 
I remember 1980 when democrats and even republicans were saying Reagan would be a disaster. The disaster occurred in 1984 when Mondale only won Washington DC and Minnesota, his home state.
 
I actually agree with Sarah on Jindal.. he's horrible.. I wouldn't vote for him if he ran for President. I think he's a nice man but just not Presidential material. Having said as much, neither is Barack Millhouse Obama.

Its Milhous, and Obama is no Nixon; Nixon began the fall of the USSR, and started China on the road to "experiments" with free markets. Sadly, he was paranoid; he was only 1 of about 15 people in the US who actually thought McGovern stood a chance in 1972.

Excuse me..I wasn't born back then..

You're correct.. Obama is not Nixon.. He's much worse.

In some ways, correct. Nixon got results when he wasn't shaking in fear, and ranting about his "enemies".
 
Louisiana is actually an unhappy marriage between two different states. The Protestant white Republican Christian rednecks in the North, and the black and Catholic democrats in the South. Jindal was elected, and is popular simply because he is white, republican, and not catholic. The majority , which is the north, would vote for a dead republican rather than allow the black democratic south to elect a governor. Jindal is Louisiana's answer to Sarah Palin, except he is not quite as dumb as she is.
 
Oh my a far left poster believing everything that a far left blog site writes.

Then again it is another distraction from what a horrible leader Obama is.

When will the far left finally be grown up and admit it?

So, a direct quote from Jindal is propaganda? Sure thing pal. If people like Jindal would learn to think before speaking, then their words wouldn't come back to bite them.

Only your dumbass interpretation of a direct quote from Jindal is propaganda. But then, who would expect you to know little things like that.

Oh, but I forget, you liberal/socialists have the secret code book that tells you what right wingers and Republicans are really saying. A few more boxtops and you can get the decoder ring, and become one of the leaders.
 
Oh my a far left poster believing everything that a far left blog site writes.

Then again it is another distraction from what a horrible leader Obama is.

When will the far left finally be grown up and admit it?

Huffington Post isn't "far left", nor did Jindal call for armed rebellion. Just the standard talking points against the President.


:lol::lol:
 
I'd say he's just pandering to the extremists in the GOP base, but it seems that there are nothing but extremists in their base these days. They've taken over the GOP to the extent that a mainstream politician thinks it's normal to call for armed revolution over democratic rule.

Bobby Jindal Says Rebellion Brewing Against Washington

Jindal spoke at the annual conference hosted by the Faith and Freedom Coalition, a group led by longtime Christian activist Ralph Reed. Organizers said more than 1,000 evangelical leaders attended the three-day gathering. Republican officials across the political spectrum concede that evangelical voters continue to play a critical role in GOP politics."I can sense right now a rebellion brewing amongst these United States," Jindal said, "where people are ready for a hostile takeover of Washington, D.C., to preserve the American Dream for our children and grandchildren."

There's no such thing as "democratic rule" in America. Your type of thinking is the problem. We have three branches of government and you ignorant leftist trash don't understand how it works.
The idiot you address doesn't have a FREE functioning brain cell...WE are not subjects and WE are NOT ruled by ANYONE. J.E.R.K. is a victim of liberal/Statist indoctrination and has no clue of true LIBERTY...nor could he care less. He refuses to relinquish his gubmint issued nose ring.
 
I'd say he's just pandering to the extremists in the GOP base, but it seems that there are nothing but extremists in their base these days. They've taken over the GOP to the extent that a mainstream politician thinks it's normal to call for armed revolution over democratic rule.

Bobby Jindal Says Rebellion Brewing Against Washington

Jindal spoke at the annual conference hosted by the Faith and Freedom Coalition, a group led by longtime Christian activist Ralph Reed. Organizers said more than 1,000 evangelical leaders attended the three-day gathering. Republican officials across the political spectrum concede that evangelical voters continue to play a critical role in GOP politics."I can sense right now a rebellion brewing amongst these United States," Jindal said, "where people are ready for a hostile takeover of Washington, D.C., to preserve the American Dream for our children and grandchildren."

There's no such thing as "democratic rule" in America. Your type of thinking is the problem. We have three branches of government and you ignorant leftist trash don't understand how it works.

Actually I do understand how it works. A hostile takeover isn't part of the equation.
 
I remember 1980 when democrats and even republicans were saying Reagan would be a disaster. The disaster occurred in 1984 when Mondale only won Washington DC and Minnesota, his home state.

Reagan was a disaster and so was Nixon. Reagan was an empty suit who had Alzheimers for heaven's sake, he didn't even run the country.

Nixon was the opposite, too hands on and he got gone because of his corrupt activities.
 
Louisiana is actually an unhappy marriage between two different states. The Protestant white Republican Christian rednecks in the North, and the black and Catholic democrats in the South. Jindal was elected, and is popular simply because he is white, republican, and not catholic. The majority , which is the north, would vote for a dead republican rather than allow the black democratic south to elect a governor. Jindal is Louisiana's answer to Sarah Palin, except he is not quite as dumb as she is.

Jindal isn't white. He's about the same shade as Obama, although I think Obama's lips are bigger and his hair is more curly. Noses are about the same. Obama, though, has a much better crease in his slacks.
 
I remember 1980 when democrats and even republicans were saying Reagan would be a disaster. The disaster occurred in 1984 when Mondale only won Washington DC and Minnesota, his home state.

Reagan was a disaster and so was Nixon. Reagan was an empty suit who had Alzheimers for heaven's sake, he didn't even run the country.

Nixon was the opposite, too hands on and he got gone because of his corrupt activities.

what exactly about Reagan's terms were disastrous?
 

Forum List

Back
Top