Jesus died for your sins ??

[Mr Natural]

We all sin, so no God couldn’t do another flood or genocide…

And why not? He's God, He can do whatever He wants. And if His creation didn't work out the way He wanted, He could've just as well wiped them all out and started over with version 2.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

And why not? He's God, He can do whatever He wants. And if His creation didn't work out the way He wanted, He could've just as well wiped them all out and started over with version 2.

The promise not to which is the symbol of the rainbow…

I swear didn’t any of you go to Sunday School?

 

[ding]

Teenagers aren't known for their critical reading skills.

I read it like I would any book. I didn't find it to be anything special.

Neither are you. Clearly you didn't watch the video.

 

[Blues Man]

And ignoring the conversation about the origin of the universe and all that cosmic background radiation that makes you uncomfortable.

By the way... you can turn on any TV set with an old school antenna and see the background radiation of the universe on any channel that isn't broadcasting. You know... the evidence for the universe being created from nothing. You can literally see it represented as static with your own eye. But don't let your own eyes fool you. Ignore seeing that background radiation because you don't understand dark matter... if it even exists in the first place.

All we can get from BG radiation is an approximate time frame.

We do not know how the universe came to be with any certainty because we cannot know what happened in the nanosecond before the universe inflated into being.

And if you want to write off 95% of the universe and call it irrelevant as compared to the 5% we actually understand then it'd you who is refusing to see the big picture

 

[Blues Man]

Neither are you. Clearly you didn't watch the video.

I don't need to watch your stupid videos.

I daresay my critical reading skills are better than yours because I don't believe everything I read

 

[ding]

All we can get from BG radiation is an approximate time frame.

We do not know how the universe came to be with any certainty because we cannot know what happened in the nanosecond before the universe inflated into being.

And if you want to write off 95% of the universe and call it irrelevant as compared to the 5% we actually understand then it'd you who is refusing to see the big picture

You don't know what you are talking about.

 

[ding]

I don't need to watch your stupid videos.

I daresay my critical reading skills are better than yours because I don't believe everything I read

Obviously not.

 

[Blues Man]

You don't know what you are talking about.

And you just think you know what you're talking about

 

[Blues Man]

Obviously not.

Only idiots believe thieving they read

Like you.

 

[ding]

And you just think you know what you're talking about

This says otherwise.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.1207.pdf

 

[ding]

Only idiots believe thieving they read

Like you.

^dunning effect

 

[Blues Man]

This says otherwise.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.1207.pdf

Just because you agree with something that doesn't account for 95% of the universe in no way mean you are 100% correct.

 

[Blues Man]

^dunning effect

Gee auto correct on my phone got the best of me again

 

[ding]

Just because you agree with something that doesn't account for 95% of the universe in no way mean you are 100% correct.

"An interesting idea is that the universe could be spontaneously created from nothing, but no rigorous proof has been given. In this paper, we present such a proof based on the analytic solutions of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation (WDWE). Explicit solutions of the WDWE for the special operator ordering factor p = −2 (or 4) show that, once a small true vacuum bubble is created by quantum fluctuations of the metastable false vacuum, it can expand exponentially no matter whether the bubble is closed, flat or open. The exponential expansion will end when the bubble becomes large and thus the early universe appears. With the de Broglie-Bohm quantum trajectory theory, we show explicitly that it is the quantum potential that plays the role of the cosmological constant and provides the power for the exponential expansion of the true vacuum bubble. So it is clear that the birth of the early universe completely depends on the quantum nature of the theory..."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.1207.pdf

 

[ding]

Gee auto correct on my phone got the best of me again

The dunning-kruger effect has nothing to do with your typo and everything to do with your behavior.

 

[Blues Man]

"An interesting idea is that the universe could be spontaneously created from nothing, but no rigorous proof has been given. In this paper, we present such a proof based on the analytic solutions of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation (WDWE). Explicit solutions of the WDWE for the special operator ordering factor p = −2 (or 4) show that, once a small true vacuum bubble is created by quantum fluctuations of the metastable false vacuum, it can expand exponentially no matter whether the bubble is closed, flat or open. The exponential expansion will end when the bubble becomes large and thus the early universe appears. With the de Broglie-Bohm quantum trajectory theory, we show explicitly that it is the quantum potential that plays the role of the cosmological constant and provides the power for the exponential expansion of the true vacuum bubble. So it is clear that the birth of the early universe completely depends on the quantum nature of the theory..."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.1207.pdf

And?

That proof is still based only on the 5% of the matter and energy in the universe that we actually understand.

 

[Blues Man]

The dunning-kruger effect has nothing to do with your typo and everything to do with your behavior.

So you're a psychiatrist and a physicist now.

Why aren't you setting the record on Jeopardy>?

 

[ding]

And?

That proof is still based only on the 5% of the matter and energy in the universe that we actually understand.

Do you have a link that supports anything you are arguing?

 

[ding]

So you're a psychiatrist and a physicist now.

Why aren't you setting the record on Jeopardy>?

Nope. Just awake.

Because knowing more than you about science isn't that much of an achievement.

 

[Blues Man]

Nope. Just awake.

Because knowing more than you about science isn't that much of an achievement.

Parroting back stuff isn't knowing