CDZ Jesus didn't exist

[Delta4Embassy]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

 

[chikenwing]

There is lots and lots of physical evidence,the Romans recorded his death in their records,try again.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A Roman historian, Tacitus, wrote of Christus's (The Messiah) crucifixion.

 

[daws101]

There is lots and lots of physical evidence,the Romans recorded his death in their records,try again.

the romans did not have dna...

 

[daws101]

A Roman historian, Tacitus, wrote of Christus's (The Messiah) crucifixion.

none of that is proof the jesus was the son of any god..

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A Roman historian, Tacitus, wrote of Christus's (The Messiah) crucifixion.

none of that is proof the jesus was the son of any god..

The thread is about His existence, no?

 

[aaronleland]

Most scholars believe Jesus was at least based off of a living person. You can argue whether or not he was the son of God, but evidence leads towards him existing in some fashion.

 

[chikenwing]

A Roman historian, Tacitus, wrote of Christus's (The Messiah) crucifixion.

none of that is proof the jesus was the son of any god..

No it doesn't ,nor doe it disprove anything ether,that and your off topic.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

The supposed account of Jesus in Talmud wasn't Jesus but someone whose name was also Yeshua (his actual name, 'Jesus' is just the English version of the Greek 'Ieosus' from the NT texts.)

 

[chikenwing]

There is lots and lots of physical evidence,the Romans recorded his death in their records,try again.

the romans did not have dna...

Ya so what your point?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

The supposed account of Jesus in Talmud wasn't Jesus but someone whose name was also Yeshua (his actual name, 'Jesus' is just the English version of the Greek 'Ieosus' from the NT texts.)

Yeshua?

Yeshua is the Hebrew name, and its English spelling is “Joshua.” Iesous is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name, and its English spelling is “Jesus.” Thus, the names “Joshua” and “Jesus” are essentially the same; both are English pronunciations of the Hebrew and Greek names for our Lord.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua_(name)

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

The supposed account of Jesus in Talmud wasn't Jesus but someone whose name was also Yeshua (his actual name, 'Jesus' is just the English version of the Greek 'Ieosus' from the NT texts.)

Again, numerous Roman historians wrote about Jesus.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

The supposed account of Jesus in Talmud wasn't Jesus but someone whose name was also Yeshua (his actual name, 'Jesus' is just the English version of the Greek 'Ieosus' from the NT texts.)

Yeshua?

Yeshua is the Hebrew name, and its English spelling is “Joshua.” Iesous is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name, and its English spelling is “Jesus.” Thus, the names “Joshua” and “Jesus” are essentially the same; both are English pronunciations of the Hebrew and Greek names for our Lord.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua_(name)

As an aside, that his name was Yeshua seems contradictory to Isaiah 7:14 prophecizing the Messiah being named 'Immanuel' not 'Yeshua.'

 

[chikenwing]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

The supposed account of Jesus in Talmud wasn't Jesus but someone whose name was also Yeshua (his actual name, 'Jesus' is just the English version of the Greek 'Ieosus' from the NT texts.)

Again, numerous Roman historians wrote about Jesus.

Not just rome ether,Jewish historians,have many accounts,and also recorded his death.

Why do people like the Op try and try to discredit something they themselves don't believe whats in it for them?,what would Freud have to say about that?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Even the Quran speaks of Jesus.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Even the Quran speaks of Jesus.

Qur'an is heavily based and dependent upon the Bible, which is in turn heavily based and dependent upon the Tanach. If you're basing a new religion on a previous one it's hard to establish yourself as credible if you're like "Jesus? Who's Jesus?"

Worth mentioning Islam maintains Jesus didn't die but ascended to Heaven alive. Hence no crucixfiction or ressurection.

 

[daws101]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

I don't doubt a guy named Jesus existed ,matter of fact jesus was a very popular name at the time.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

I don't doubt a guy named Jesus existed ,matter of fact jesus was a very popular name at the time.

Well, Yeshua might have been. "Jesus" is English, not Hebrew.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Even the Quran speaks of Jesus.

Qur'an is heavily based and dependent upon the Bible, which is in turn heavily based and dependent upon the Tanach. If you're basing a new religion on a previous one it's hard to establish yourself as credible if you're like "Jesus? Who's Jesus?"

Worth mentioning Islam maintains Jesus didn't die but ascended to Heaven alive. Hence no crucixfiction or ressurection.

Regardless, your premise is sinking faster than a stone in a river. Even the Greek historians mention Jesus.

You don't want to believe that's fine but your nonsense is just that, nonsense.