Most believe in the sanctifying work of Jesus Christ. Much of the rest is just window dressing. The true church is the body of spirit led believers wherever they are and whatever 'church' they attend. Heck, even some Catholics are likely true Christians.
The order of creation and the singularity of the Creator.
Yup there is no Tri headed godhood the trinity is 3 different beings.
Not so. If that were true, they would all do everything in the name of Jesus Christ. Yet, they don't even name their churches in his name. And, his name isn't "Christ." That's a title of Messiah. That limits the number of possible true churches that have Jesus authority to act in His name. Remember, he said that many would cry out Lord, Lord, have I not done work in your name? And, he responded that they did not have his authority and he didn't know them.Most believe in the sanctifying work of Jesus Christ. Much of the rest is just window dressing. The true church is the body of spirit led believers wherever they are and whatever 'church' they attend. Heck, even some Catholics are likely true Christians.
To JWs, that would be Jehovah. They believe Jehovah is the Father and that Jesus is not the Son of God or in other words, a God as well. Yet, the bible is clear that Jesus said he is the Son of God and also a God as well. That would make JWs not Christians. At least LDS believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God and part of the Godhead of the three, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. LDS baptize in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. JWs do not.
So if you knew why did you ask?
You wouldn’t know a sensible remark if it was tattooed to your forehead…
They have different beliefs about Jesus than Christians.
Jesus said that "many would come in his name and deceive many". The true church is "spirit led", not led by a single denomination.
The correct Bible is the one published especially for the English-speaking people, the KJV.The Bible has an interesting history, people rarely think how it came to be, how various disparate literature was collected and compiled into a single "Bible". For centuries different sacred texts were used by different churches and there was little agreement.
There are many texts not included in today's Bible but were once staple material in some churches in some geographic regions, there is a lot of literature about Jesus not included in our Bibles but who decides what is and is not inspired?
New Testament apocrypha - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So there's never been unanimity over which books are relevant never mind which interpretation of those books is "correct".
Personally I avoid organized church groups, most of them have some kind of statement of beliefs and I've never seen a set of those that I completely accept nor do I think it is necessary.
Some things are unclear and we should not make up weird interpretations in an attempt to make them clear.
For example the Trinity is a very interesting subject, the Bible itself doesn't even use that word yet for many Christians it is heresy to deny the modern concept of the trinity yet there are numerous NT passages that are not reconcilable with the concept of the trinity.
Yep, they may be misguided but they are Christians.
How does one study JW's for a year? Is there a class on that?
met one and he will gladly teach you about his beliefs.
Hard pass. I'm good.
you ask a question all I did is answer it.
