Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald J. Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein’s victims.

[Nostra]

The Democrats just blocked the entire release of the all the Epstein files by unanimous consent... they blocked it not the Republicans the Democrats blocked it do you understand that? .. no you're too damn stupid your mind is ravaged with Trump's arrangement syndrome... sad

These idiots still believe Trump shut down the government instead of Schumer.

They can't think for themselves.

 

[AntonToo]

The hill is a fake Trump hitting fake news column...always has ... Let's do this again

You are not doing it. You don't understand wtf you are reading.


Discharge petition for Epstein file release vote has now passed and there will in fact be a Democrat forced vote on House floor next week.

Here's what an Epstein files vote in the House could look like

Here's what we know about what could happen when the House takes up its Jeffrey Epstein files bill next week.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Nostra]

You are not doing it.

Here's what an Epstein files vote in the House could look like

Here's what we know about what could happen when the House takes up its Jeffrey Epstein files bill next week.

abcnews.go.com

"could look like"

 

[Missouri_Mike]

How many times does Missouri_Mike need to be educated on the fact that D want the R votes on the public record

Clearly it was Burchett playing dishonest games.

How many times are you going to admit you don’t give a **** about releasing the documents you want to play political games with them.

 

[Jroc]

You are not doing it.

Here's what an Epstein files vote in the House could look like

Here's what we know about what could happen when the House takes up its Jeffrey Epstein files bill next week.

abcnews.go.com

Hey dumbass unanimous consent doesn't require all those votes they just agree to release it and its released the Democrats didn't agree to it did they take little snippets and release them the fools like you.. Maybe you should learn how these things work

 

[hadit]

And Trump is clearly against that, Democrats clearly for it.

It took a long time for them to give a flying rat's patoot and only started when Orange Man was holding the ribbon. When Quid Pro Joe was in charge, they didn't care.

 

[AntonToo]

It took a long time for them to give a flying rat's patoot

How does that compare to Trump and other Republicans opposing it?

Seems you need to learn how to take a yes for an answer.

 

[leftwinger]

ITrump haters are like dope fiends ,sick people, they feen and shake over anything anti-trump they can ind no matter how false and untrue it is...they're sick people they'll stand with communist dictators and islamist as long as they're against Trump

When they start destroying the economic buildup, affecting my situation also (Russia, FLU, stolen 2020) they deserve whatever happens. All of them.

 

[hadit]

How does that compare to Trump opposing it?

Seems you need to learn how to take a yes for an answer.

I'm glad they finally came around. I guess the fax machines finally spoke.

 

[Nostra]

How does that compare to Trump and other Republicans opposing it?

Seems you need to learn how to take a yes for an answer.

Why didn't Tater release them?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Did Epstein also say he was innocent of sex trafficking minors?

 

[Winco]

How many times are you going to admit you don’t give a **** about releasing the documents you want to play political games with them.

You are incorrect.

I want (R) to publicly vote to NOT release the files.
Burchett is the ONE that is trying to HIDE the (R) votes, by suggesting Unanimous Consent:

Unanimous consent is an agreement where every member of a group gives their approval for a proposal, with no objections. It is a way to bypass formal voting and debate for non-controversial matters, making meetings or legislative procedures more efficient. <<<<<< Why does Burchett want to avoid a public vote.

C'mon, you know.....

 

[AntonToo]

Hey dumbass unanimous consent doesn't require all those votes they just agree to release it and its released the Democrats didn't agree to it did they take little snippets and release them the fools like you.. Maybe you should learn how these things work

Hey dumbass the vote is specifically to get Republicans on record.

It's political sausage making where the underlying substance is that in fact it's primarily Democrats that are forcing Epstein files to be released and primarily Trump and Republicans that are doing all they can to stop it.

That's why I say you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Nostra]

You are incorrect.

I want (R) to publicly vote to NOT release the files.
Burchett is the ONE that is trying to HIDE the (R) votes, by suggesting Unanimous Consent:

Unanimous consent is an agreement where every member of a group gives their approval for a proposal, with no objections. It is a way to bypass formal voting and debate for non-controversial matters, making meetings or legislative procedures more efficient. <<<<<< Why does Burchett want to avoid a public vote.

C'mon, you know.....

Why didn't Tater release them?

 

[Nostra]

He dumbass the vote is specifically to get Republicans on record.

It's political sausage making where the underlying substance is that in fact it's primarily Democrats that are forcing Epstein files to be released and primarily Trump and Republicans that are doing all they can to stop it.

That's why I say you have no idea what you are talking about.

Why didn't Tater release them?

 

[leftwinger]

You are not doing it. You don't understand wtf you are reading.


Discharge petition for Epstein file release vote has now passed and there will in fact be a Democrat forced vote on House floor next week.

Here's what an Epstein files vote in the House could look like

Here's what we know about what could happen when the House takes up its Jeffrey Epstein files bill next week.

abcnews.go.com

Lazy trolling arsewipe. You wont look thru the dociluments just like this weeks releases. You're too busy posting your brilliance lol!

 

[dblack]

Why didn't Tater release them?

Why does that question sound like a rebuttal to you?

 

[Hellokitty]

No it doesn't ring a bell because

1. it was NOT AT ALL ignored, but in fact discussed at length many many times. (this Chinese deal never went anywhere, "big guy" being Joe is a conjecture, and even assuming it to be so, Hunter was known to lie about his dad and what he did. There has never been actual serious evidence of Biden involving himself in any of his son's deals.)

2. WTF does that have to do with raping underage girls? NOTHING, so again, just a stupid deflection from a stupid liar.

Do you believe Epstein is a liar? Do you believe the victims are liars?
Epstein say the victims are lying, do you believe Epstein or the victims?

 

[Winco]

Why didn't Tater release them?

If you don't like the answer provide, then counter my answer with some fact.

You sound like an idiot asking the same question, when an answer has already been provided.

Why didn't Tater release them?

Why didn't Tater release them?

I know, I Know, you will ask again anyway...................LOLLOLLLL-SIMP-LOLLLOLLOOL

 

[Nostra]

Why does that question sound like a rebuttal to you?

non answer.

Try again.

Why didn't Tater release them?