Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759
The BLS did not saay that the economy was growing at a breakneck speed.
Either Jack Welch is a liar, or the author of this thread is trying to make him one.
Jack Welch is senile.
Jack welch is a financial genius.
Obviously, you have very low standards.
The facts have made a fool of Jackass Welch and any moron who absolutely agrees with him.http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759
The BLS did not saay that the economy was growing at a breakneck speed.
Either Jack Welch is a liar, or the author of this thread is trying to make him one.
Jack Welch stated that the economy would have to be growing at a breakneck speed for unemployment to drop a half percent in two months. I absolutely agree!
By the way, if you bothered to read the article; you'd know that he reasoned that other economic factors such as great quarterly growth would be accompanying such a drastic downturn.
So he's not a liar; you're just a hack!
Growth is expansion of GDP. What do you think it is?
I'm no economist; or an amateur economist at best. But I know that GDP is only one measure of an economy. And speaking of GDP; it is usually going up (as money is usually being inflated). Therefore, it is the rate of GDP that counts. And GDP growth is sub par and has been. Therefore (when I consider the anemic rate of growth), I disagree with your assessment that "the economy is slowly growing."
Growth is expansion of GDP. What do you think it is?
I'm no economist; or an amateur economist at best. But I know that GDP is only one measure of an economy. And speaking of GDP; it is usually going up (as money is usually being inflated). Therefore, it is the rate of GDP that counts. And GDP growth is sub par and has been. Therefore (when I consider the anemic rate of growth), I disagree with your assessment that "the economy is slowly growing."
Subpar economic growth means the economy is growing slowly.
The facts have made a fool of Jackass Welch and any moron who absolutely agrees with him.http://www.usmessageboard.com/econo...ontrary-to-obamas-bls-claims.html#post6136759
The BLS did not saay that the economy was growing at a breakneck speed.
Either Jack Welch is a liar, or the author of this thread is trying to make him one.
Jack Welch stated that the economy would have to be growing at a breakneck speed for unemployment to drop a half percent in two months. I absolutely agree!
By the way, if you bothered to read the article; you'd know that he reasoned that other economic factors such as great quarterly growth would be accompanying such a drastic downturn.
So he's not a liar; you're just a hack!
Why do you presume to lecture me?
Also, your worthless attempt to diminish me as a serious poster is only a part of your foolish designs.
Jack Welch is senile.
No, just programmed, poorly. The chip in his empty skull has a limited number of responses.
brainless violent liberal without the IQ to respond with substance so is reduced to violence
Embarrassingly, I did not know that. Is that true in all states? And thanks for actually posting a fact on a thread in dire need of a few.[And contrary to your bullshit about part timers being worse off because they do not collect UE insurance benefits, assuming they are eligible for UI then PT work extends the time they can collect and increases their take home benefits by 20%.
Try again.
The economy is not growing at breakneck speed. It's growing at a slow to moderate pace.
Define growth. You could have a technical case. But I wouldn't be quick to agree with that at all.
CBO Forecast Update Aug 22 said:CBO expects the economic recovery to continue at a modest pace for the remainder of calendar year 2012, with real (inflation-adjusted) GDP growing at an annual rate of about 2¼ percent in the second half of the year, compared with a rate of about 1¾ percent in the first half. The unemployment rate will stay above 8 percent for the rest of the year, CBO estimates, and the rate of inflation in consumer prices will remain low.
Growth is expansion of GDP. What do you think it is?
GDP under Bush 3.5
GDP under Obama 1.7 down from 2.4.
I'm no economist; or an amateur economist at best. But I know that GDP is only one measure of an economy. And speaking of GDP; it is usually going up (as money is usually being inflated). Therefore, it is the rate of GDP that counts. And GDP growth is sub par and has been. Therefore (when I consider the anemic rate of growth), I disagree with your assessment that "the economy is slowly growing."
Inflation is way up.
I'm no economist; or an amateur economist at best. But I know that GDP is only one measure of an economy. And speaking of GDP; it is usually going up (as money is usually being inflated). Therefore, it is the rate of GDP that counts. And GDP growth is sub par and has been. Therefore (when I consider the anemic rate of growth), I disagree with your assessment that "the economy is slowly growing."
Subpar economic growth means the economy is growing slowly.
Not at all. Families have used 40 percent of their savings. House prices are way down. Inflation is way up. The debt is way up. Jobs are down. Welfare is up. The economy is not growing. The economy is waffling at best.
I myself, thought I'd be in a much better position today from five years ago. And I doubt that I'm in the minority.
Discouraged workers DECLINED from 844,000 to 802,000.The facts have made a fool of Jackass Welch and any moron who absolutely agrees with him.Jack Welch stated that the economy would have to be growing at a breakneck speed for unemployment to drop a half percent in two months. I absolutely agree!
By the way, if you bothered to read the article; you'd know that he reasoned that other economic factors such as great quarterly growth would be accompanying such a drastic downturn.
So he's not a liar; you're just a hack!
there are three facts:
1) discouraged workers stopped looking so unemployment went down
2) other discouraged workers (2/3 of 900,000 new jobs) gave up and settled for part time work at Mickey D and 7-11.
3) 300,000 baby boomers retire each month
Now you have the facts too, liberal!!
Subpar economic growth means the economy is growing slowly.
Not at all. Families have used 40 percent of their savings. House prices are way down. Inflation is way up. The debt is way up. Jobs are down. Welfare is up. The economy is not growing. The economy is waffling at best.
I myself, thought I'd be in a much better position today from five years ago. And I doubt that I'm in the minority.
The only correct part of this dialogue is when you said "I'm no economist."
Discouraged workers DECLINED from 844,000 to 802,000.The facts have made a fool of Jackass Welch and any moron who absolutely agrees with him.
there are three facts:
1) discouraged workers stopped looking so unemployment went down
2) other discouraged workers (2/3 of 900,000 new jobs) gave up and settled for part time work at Mickey D and 7-11.
3) 300,000 baby boomers retire each month
Now you have the facts too, liberal!!
Part time jobs can lead to full time jobs, getting a foot in the door is hardly discouraging.
300,000 Boomers reach retirement age each month. They all might not retire, though more than half do.
Now you have the actual facts CON$ervoFascist.
Not at all. Families have used 40 percent of their savings. House prices are way down. Inflation is way up. The debt is way up. Jobs are down. Welfare is up. The economy is not growing. The economy is waffling at best.
I myself, thought I'd be in a much better position today from five years ago. And I doubt that I'm in the minority.
The only correct part of this dialogue is when you said "I'm no economist."
Compared to you I'm fucking Friedrich August Hayek BITCH
You're a pathetic piece of trash btw. I give you points and so you can only go back a couple posts to look for a childish insult. I'll just take that as your admission that you just got your ass handed to you and you have no response.
The only correct part of this dialogue is when you said "I'm no economist."
Compared to you I'm fucking Friedrich August Hayek BITCH
You're a pathetic piece of trash btw. I give you points and so you can only go back a couple posts to look for a childish insult. I'll just take that as your admission that you just got your ass handed to you and you have no response.
You don't even understand the most basic concepts in the English language, let alone economics. In your own post, you yourself said we had anemic growth. That means growing slowly. I agreed. But for some reason, you decided to display your rank ignorance and contradict your own post. Now you've decided to meltdown. If you understood even the most basic concepts, you wouldn't embarrass yourself.
