Jack Smith tells Congress he wants to testify publicly

[meaner gene]

The DEFENSE isn't capable of lawfare, you braindead fool.

That's where you're again wrong.

Lawfare is the strategic use of legal proceedings and the law as a weapon to achieve objectives that are typically pursued through military, political, or economic conflict. It involves using the legal system to intimidate, damage, or hobble an opponent, whether a country, organization, or individual. The term is a portmanteau of "law" and "warfare".

The defense filing nonsense motion after motion after motion, and then appealing them when they lose, is "lawfare" against the plaintiff or prosecution, that has to use resources to respond to each motion.

 

[westwall]

That's where you're again wrong.

Lawfare is the strategic use of legal proceedings and the law as a weapon to achieve objectives that are typically pursued through military, political, or economic conflict. It involves using the legal system to intimidate, damage, or hobble an opponent, whether a country, organization, or individual. The term is a portmanteau of "law" and "warfare".

The defense filing nonsense motion after motion after motion, and then appealing them when they lose, is "lawfare" against the plaintiff or prosecution, that has to use resources to respond to each motion.

No, you dumbass. Lawfare is the systematic, corruption of the legal process to ATTACK a political opponent. Thus, using CONSTITUTIONALLY guaranteed defenses can never be lawfare.

Lawfare is ONLY available to the people in power.

 

[meaner gene]

No, you dumbass. Lawfare is the systematic, corruption of the legal process to ATTACK a political opponent. Thus, using CONSTITUTIONALLY guaranteed defenses can never be lawfare.

Lawfare is ONLY available to the people in power.

Are you on drugs?

lawfare

1. the use of legal action to cause problems for an opponent: 2. the use of…

dictionary.cambridge.org

lawfare
noun
the use of legal action to cause problems for an opponent:

 

[westwall]

Are you on drugs?

lawfare

1. the use of legal action to cause problems for an opponent: 2. the use of…

dictionary.cambridge.org

lawfare
noun
the use of legal action to cause problems for an opponent:

Who uses lawfare? Those in power are the only ones who can initiate. Your infantile definition ignores that fact.

 

[meaner gene]

Who uses lawfare? Those in power are the only ones who can initiate. Your infantile definition ignores that fact.

Lawfare is waged by those who are willing to spend more money or legal representation than their opponent.

Such as when Trump filed over 1,000 lawsuits against people or companies that TRUMP OWED MONEY TO.

Forcing them to settle because they couldn't afford the legal fees to defend themselves in the higher and higher courts Trump would appeal the case to.

 

[meaner gene]

Who uses lawfare? Those in power are the only ones who can initiate. Your infantile definition ignores that fact.

The Lawsuit: Juan Carlos Enriquez's company, The Paint Spot, filed a lawsuit against the Trump Organization after being left unpaid for paint used at the Doral resort.
The Court's Ruling: A Miami-Dade Circuit Court judge ruled in favor of Enriquez in 2016, finding the Trump Organization liable for the payment.
Payment Delays: Despite the ruling, the Trump Organization appealed the decision, which led to further delays in payment for Enriquez.

 

[westwall]

Lawfare is waged by those who are willing to spend more money or legal representation than their opponent.

Such as when Trump filed over 1,000 lawsuits against people or companies that TRUMP OWED MONEY TO.

Forcing them to settle because they couldn't afford the legal fees to defend themselves in the higher and higher courts Trump would appeal the case to.

That's not lawfare. Lawfare is the corrupt misuse of government power to attack political opponents.

It's commonly used in 3rd world shitholes to maintain power for a corrupt few people.

 

[meaner gene]

You wanted an example of lawfare?

Despite the ruling, the Trump Organization appealed the decision, which led to further delays in payment for Enriquez.

So after winning the case, Enriquez had to get new or additional lawyers who were members of the federal bar to respond to the groundless appeals.

LAWFARE !!!

 

[meaner gene]

That's not lawfare. Lawfare is the corrupt misuse of government power to attack political opponents.

It's commonly used in 3rd world shitholes to maintain power for a corrupt few people.

Get a dictionary.

 

[meaner gene]

Trump’s Total Lawfare

Michael Burleigh catalogs the second Trump presidency's rapid descent into state lawlessness.

www.project-syndicate.org

Trump’s Total Lawfare

Of course, Trump has long practiced the “lawfare” now being brought to bear on Comey. A vexatious litigant, he was involved in some 4,000 cases between 1973 and 2016 against business and personal rivals, the tax authorities, and for personal defamation. He seems to revel in the drama of litigation, changing lawyers – who must sue to get their fees – as frequently as others change their shirts.

Much of this serial litigation involved attempts to weasel out of paying small contractors, like painters and plumbers. The tactics are always the same: Entangle the opponent in costly and lengthy litigation until he goes bankrupt and runs up the white flag.

 

[westwall]

Get a dictionary.

I don't need one. Unlike you.

 

[meaner gene]

AI Overview
Yes, vexatious litigation is a form of lawfare because it uses the legal system to harass, intimidate, or financially drain an opponent, rather than to seek legitimate justice. While lawfare is a broader term for using legal tactics for strategic advantage, vexatious litigation is a specific type of this, characterized by the filing of lawsuits or motions that are frivolous, repetitive, and without a good-faith basis.

 

[meaner gene]

I don't need one. Unlike you.

You obviously do, or you wouldn't be posting vexatious responses.

 

[Care4all]

The DEFENSE isn't capable of lawfare, you braindead fool.

Of course it is, when you are wealthy! That's the two tier justice system everyone at our level, complains about silly one. That ain't done magically twitching the nose...it's lawfare, in its own right.

 

[Lesh]

there are in regards to Grand Jury testimony and other legal actions

He covered that in his letter

 

[Care4all]

"Let him?"

The first amendment lets him.

He can go on any news show that will have him and justify his actions for as long as they let him. If they kick him out when they see what a fanatic he is, the sidewalk is still a traditional public forum open to him.

No he can NOT....he's bound by rules governing prosecutions and special council rules. His official report due to be released, was and is, being held back by Pam Bondi....

 

[westwall]

Of course it is, when you are wealthy! That's the two tier justice system everyone at our level, complains about silly one. That ain't done magically twitching the nose...it's lawfare, in its own right.

No, lawfare can only be launched by those in positions of power, you nincompoop.

 

[22lcidw]

Of course it is, when you are wealthy! That's the two tier justice system everyone at our level, complains about silly one. That ain't done magically twitching the nose...it's lawfare, in its own right.

You are the party of the real Oligarchs. For you lie about pushing it on the other side.

 

[Seymour Flops]

No he can NOT....he's bound by rules governing prosecutions and special council rules. His official report due to be released, was and is, being held back by Pam Bondi....

If he's bound by those rules, how can he testify publicly in Congress?

Does he plan to break them there?

 

[Care4all]

If he's bound by those rules, how can he testify publicly in Congress?

Does he plan to break them there?

He'd have to get permission for public or behind closed doors, from the doj....is my understanding of it.....

By law he had to report his special counsel investigation to Bondi and she was to release a redacted version to the public, as was released on the special counsel election subversion investigation by AG Garland, the classified document investigation report was finished right at the very last days of Biden and passed to Bondi to release the redacted version to the public. She has not done so, as of yet...9 months after she was suppose to do.

Maureen Comey... prosecutor for Maxwell and Epstein can't talk about their files from investigations either....