Gosh, you're stupid or playing it the best you can!!!!Um because it never went to trial
Duh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gosh, you're stupid or playing it the best you can!!!!Um because it never went to trial
Duh
Geez man, the xiden admin had four years to try and bring a case against Trump, they couldn’t.He did not have years, he had a year....and a lot of delay delay delay delay delay with Trump and all his appeals to the court
No really, he couldn’t even get it to trialGosh, you're stupid or playing it the best you can!!!!
We didn't try it, YOU Republicans created it as a legal rule and policy in the DOJ....Nixon era timeline, I believe....?This is the same run around crap you all try with Muller. The info is really there but neither Muller nor Smith could produce nor state such . Feelings and wishes fantasy is all it is
I just don't agree, at all!No really, he couldn’t even get it to trial
That’s how weak and in illegal it was
But let’s me clear, he was never suppose to take it to trial or was all done with the purpose of impacting the election and helping xiden win
Epic failure on every level
And it was all right out in the open, for all to see.There was every intention to take him to trial because...drum roll.... he committed crimes,
once he was indicted...trump just used his lawfare and delay tactics in appealing every move, that bought time, bought his beloved way to beat unbeatable things....delay, delay, delay, delay, DELAYING justice....it's his M/O...modus operandi in the courts.
Haha lawfare? You mean defending himself from the illegal prosecution?I just don't agree, at all!
There was every intention to take him to trial because...drum roll.... he committed crimes,
once he was indicted...trump just used his lawfare and delay tactics in appealing every move, that bought time, bought his beloved way to beat unbeatable things....delay, delay, delay, delay, DELAYING justice....it's his M/O...modus operandi in the courts.
Agree! Anything said in private by Jack, can be said in public!Anything he could legally tell them in private, he can tell them in public. This is not about classified documents.
It was 100% lawfare by Trump! It's what he does, with every case brought against him....find any way possible, to delay delay delay with all kinds of trumped up legalize...that's lawfare kiddo! What he falsely accuses others of doing, he's a Mastermind of....Haha lawfare? You mean defending himself from the illegal prosecution?
How very fascist of you to claim it’s lawfare for a defendant to exercise his rights and not just let your regime imprison him
he made legal arguments and won. That’s called a defense, that’s not lawfare. In fact his defense exposed the illegal acts by the xiden admin to try and jail him and keep him from runningIt was 100% lawfare by Trump! It's what he does, with every case brought against him....find any way possible, to delay delay delay with all kinds of trumped up legalize...that's lawfare kiddo! What he falsely accuses others of doing, he's a Mastermind of....
Smith is being investigated for malicious prosecution.Highly unlikely.
At a congressional hearing, when its democrats turned to question him.Yes, he would be allowed to ramble on and on about all the allegations against trump. Just in case we've only heard those a hundred and seventeen times that would be a hundred and eighteen.
At his criminal trial, he will only be allowed to present evidence that exonerates him from the accusations against him. What trump did or did not do would have no bearing on that unless he was charged, somehow being an accomplice.
Don't forget his illegal spying on US senators.Smith is being investigated for malicious prosecution.
His only defense can be proving the prosecution was warranted
That involves discussing the mountains of evidence against Trump
If you're referring to the OLC's opinion that a sitting prez can't be prosecuted it goes back to 1973 and was re-affirmed in 2000. The legality has never been tested but it would be a waste of time to challenge the ruling while trump's court is in control. After all, it created presidential immunity for him despite there being nothing constitutional about it.We didn't try it, YOU Republicans created it as a legal rule and policy in the DOJ....Nixon era timeline, I believe....?
Don't forget that's bullshit.Don't forget his illegal spying on US senators.
Jack Smith has agreed to testify in front of Jordan's committee, but publicly. I believe another victim did this and they wouldn't hold a public hearing. This should be interesting.
Jack Smith tells Congress he wants to testify publicly
Former special counsel Jack Smith is asking that he be allowed to appear publicly after House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) demanded his testimony.
“Given the many mischaracterizations of Mr. Smith’s investigation into President Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents and role in attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Mr. Smith respectfully requests the opportunity to testify in open hearings before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees,” his attorneys wrote in a letter to Jordan.
Jordan requested a transcribed, closed-door interview with Smith earlier this month, accusing the former special counsel and his team team of launching “politically motivated prosecutions” into Trump and trying to “silence” him during the campaign.
Smith’s effort to appear publicly would require the blessing of the Justice Department, with his attorneys saying he would need guidance so he doesn’t violate any rules regarding grand jury secrecy. He would also likely be asked to answer questions about the Mar-a-Lago investigation. The special counsel’s final report on that case has not been released.
“He is prepared to answer questions about the Special Counsel’s investigation and prosecution, but requires assurance from the Department of Justice that he will not be punished for doing so,” Smith’s legal team said.
The Progressive Socialist Communist judicial system from Progressive areas is what accused Trump. Whatever you think Trump is, he is a builder. James is a DEI promoted wunderkind from the Progressive Socialist Communist school of pure equality. And she has helped no growth in employment for people to survive. She just lets certain groups get away with crimes and others to pay for the millennial treatment of her race.I just don't agree, at all!
There was every intention to take him to trial because...drum roll.... he committed crimes,
once he was indicted...trump just used his lawfare and delay tactics in appealing every move, that bought time, bought his beloved way to beat unbeatable things....delay, delay, delay, delay, DELAYING justice....it's his M/O...modus operandi in the courts.
Well, that is another example of a case in which Smith could present evidence of crimes by Trump.Smith is being investigated for malicious prosecution.
His only defense can be proving the prosecution was warranted
That involves discussing the mountains of evidence against Trump
Congress is investigating himWell, that is another example of a case in which Smith could present evidence of crimes by Trump.
But, he is not being charged with that, so it won't happen.
Just making up a lie on the spot is not an argument.
"Let him?"Congress is investigating him
He has a right to justify his actions
Will they let him?
The DEFENSE isn't capable of lawfare, you braindead fool.It was 100% lawfare by Trump! It's what he does, with every case brought against him....find any way possible, to delay delay delay with all kinds of trumped up legalize...that's lawfare kiddo! What he falsely accuses others of doing, he's a Mastermind of....