The attached two files I've posted very frequently because I wanted someone to refute them!
But no one has! This first file explains this fact:
Barack Obama,
41 percent negative,
59 percent positive;
George W. Bush,
57 percent negative,
43 percent positive; and
Bill Clinton,
60 percent negative, 40 percent positive.
June to September of 2018 found that
92 percent of the coverage related to the president Trump during that period was negative in tone, as compared to a mere
8 percent that was positive.
Subsequent media studies have found continued overwhelmingly negative coverage of the president.
A previous Media Research Center (MRC) study in which researchers viewed more than 1,000 hours of network news coverage ” ABC, CBS and NBC”
A subsequent Harvard University study produced similar results. The Washington Examiner noted:
The Harvard scholars analyzed the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the main newscasts (not talk shows) of CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC during Trump’s initial time in office. They found, to no one’s surprise, that Trump absolutely dominated news coverage in the first 100 days. And then they found that news coverage was solidly negative
80 percent negative among those outlets studied, versus
20 percent positive.
By Jon Dougherty Th
www.thenationalsentinel.com
So would those of you who think the MSM was NOT influential in the 2020 election of Biden... please refute this!
View attachment 538247View attachment 538246
