Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,371
- 16,802
- 2,190
Then it should be easy to answerThat's like asking why I don't want to get cancer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then it should be easy to answerThat's like asking why I don't want to get cancer.
So this guy brought the wrong flag?There was no NAZI rally, douchebag.
I thought you were talking about JAN 6. Yeah, some Nazis staged their own rally. Republicans couldn't stop them from doing that.Yes there was. They had torches and everything. Check out the Vice documentary on it. They follow the rally leader though-out the entire day. You can hear it from the horses mouth and not from a media personality
I was talking about JAN 6, not Charlottesville. There were some NAZI's at the latter, but it wasn't a "NAZI" rally.So this guy brought the wrong flag?
Wrong, douchebag. He deserved it as much as Obama deserved the Nobel Prize.Nothing to refute
Trump received so much negative coverage because he deserved it.
It is like complaining that the Class Bully gets more detention than the honor student.
Ask someone who cares.Then it should be easy to answer
Obama earned a Nobel for being our first black PresidentWrong, douchebag. He deserved it as much as Obama deserved the Nobel Prize.
I was talking about JAN 6, not Charlottesville. There were some NAZI's at the latter, but it wasn't a "NAZI" rally.
Of course, commie douchebags like you are trying to paint everyone there as a NAZI.
Obama earned a Nobel for being our first black President
Trump earned disdain for trying to overturn a lawful election
Tell us how you aren't an imbecile.Tell us again how some of them are good people
Nice try SkippyTell us how you aren't an imbecile.
ROLF! You believe that's something to admire!
It was a swindle. Trump deserves our thanks for exposing it.
Yeah it was ugly stuff… and I’d bet that Trump paid attention for all of 3 minutes to what was going on and then spoke off the cuff when questioned about it like he always does. Point is we are talking about his comments and though ignorant and political and careless he was quite clear that he was referring to statue protestors and not white suprematists. Even if there were zero statue protestors actually there he is still clear about what he is referring to.The Charlottesville protest was the racist rally. It was a two day event. The first day was the nighttime march with torches to the statue. The second day was a daytime protest where counter-protestors showed up against them.
Haha, you don’t think those in charolettesville who staged the Unite the Right rally were Trump voting republicans?! You're right they were probably Dems who voted for HillaryI thought you were talking about JAN 6. Yeah, some Nazis staged their own rally. Republicans couldn't stop them from doing that.
For somebody who doesn’t care you sure bitch about it a lotAsk someone who cares.
No one but a fucking moron was talking about 1/6. And I didn't call it a Nazi rally. I called it a racist rally. Though it did include some neo-nazis.I was talking about JAN 6, not Charlottesville. There were some NAZI's at the latter, but it wasn't a "NAZI" rally.
Of course, commie douchebags like you are trying to paint everyone there as a NAZI.
That was actually what he said 3 days after he took heat for saying, "we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides." But regardless, I disagree with you. It doesn't matter if he meant others than the racists since there is no evidence of there being anybody but racists there on the right. It was designed to be a racist rally. Saying there were "very fine people" on a side with no very fine people only served to embolden the racists who took that to mean them.Yeah it was ugly stuff… and I’d bet that Trump paid attention for all of 3 minutes to what was going on and then spoke off the cuff when questioned about it like he always does. Point is we are talking about his comments and though ignorant and political and careless he was quite clear that he was referring to statue protestors and not white suprematists. Even if there were zero statue protestors actually there he is still clear about what he is referring to.
“You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group … There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before — if you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people — neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest.”
I agree that is what the statement did… I clearly said I think it was a stupid statement. I’m just saying that we need to be honest and accurate regarding what he was talking about. As soon as his statement is mischaracterized the fake news train gets fuel. There is no point in doing thatThat was actually what he said 3 days after he took heat for saying, "we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides." But regardless, I disagree with you. It doesn't matter if he meant others than the racists since there is no evidence of there being anybody but racists there on the right. It was designed to be a racist rally. Saying there were "very fine people" on a side with no very fine people only served to embolden the racists who took that to mean them.
When did that happen? In case you haven't noticed, I always insult leftwing idiots like you.Nice try Skippy
As usual you resort to insults when you get your ass kicked in thread