francoHFW
Diamond Member
If they're closet indies or Dems, not greedy idiot, holier than thou GOP hypocrites...and Trump's mad genius deals work...
It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
keepitreal
Platinum Member
Blah blah....IT SHOULDN'T BE MY RESPONSIBILITY
TO HELP COVER ANYONES PRENATAL CARE
AND DELIVERY COSTS NOR THE SUBSEQUENT EXPENSE
OF TAKING CARE OF THE CHILD! BLAH BLAH
ALLOWING PEOPLE TO DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES
OF THEIR CHOICES WOULD DRASTICALLY REDUCE
ABORTION CUZ IT WOULD DRASTICALLY REDUCE
UNWANTED PREGNANCIES AND DRASTICALLY REDUCE
PROCREATING BECAUSE THEY'RE ON THEIR OWN!
BLAH BLAH
francoHFW
Diamond Member
If you don't cover BC, you get to cover whole lifetimes of single mothers and the hospital costs for births. That works great, dolt.
keepitreal
Platinum Member
Trust me...if people had to buy their own BC they would
If a female is responsible enough to take BC control,
Trust me, THEY'RE WORKING!
If it's free, it's for me too!
Most voters voted against the female democrat. Just keeping it in perspective.
Yeah, thanks to NaziCon gerrymandering, voter suppression, conspiracy theories, fake news, lies, Comey, and Putin. You must feel really proud.
the_human_being
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 15,277
- 2,747
- 290
They appear to be working. More jobs announced today.
imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 11,417
- 5,491
- 400
I am not going to quote, nor read this whole thread. I am going to be honest, and tell POKYHONTAS....aka......Lacooter............to get a life after death. You people are DOA, lol. No cred, and even if you chase me around with a tomahawk, I will have to succumb, because I will be laughing so hard.
Seriously conservatives----->why-oh-why do you even pay attention to the Cooter, Winger, Carebear, Cambell, etc? All they are doing is trying to get a response, so as they can get money, lol. They are ASTRO TURFERS! Ignore them, and you will do far more than anything you could do with words. You will cost them MONEY, MULLAH, DENEIRO, PESOS, Dollars, and their lifeblood, which they get from YOUR responses.
Screw them! Starve the little SNOWFLAKES! Make them get out of mommy and daddy basement, and get a friggin job! These people need YOU, which means hose their LEFTIST rearends. Lets get USMB people off the welfare rolls, ala Reagan. Never, EVER respond to an ASTRO TURFER! As long as they are NOT in the response thread, they get NO MONEY FOR BEING LIBERAL ASSH****! Soooooooooooo, never, ever........never ever...........reply with them in the message, lol. What you do, is reply directly, nobody being responded to.
You made Hitlery pay, you made Obowelmovement pay, now it is time you make Winger, Jake, and the rest of the PAID POSTERS get hosed! No money, moolla, cash, denero,pesos, or anything else for them! Hose the little twirps, and hose them NOW by ignoring them-)
Seriously conservatives----->why-oh-why do you even pay attention to the Cooter, Winger, Carebear, Cambell, etc? All they are doing is trying to get a response, so as they can get money, lol. They are ASTRO TURFERS! Ignore them, and you will do far more than anything you could do with words. You will cost them MONEY, MULLAH, DENEIRO, PESOS, Dollars, and their lifeblood, which they get from YOUR responses.
Screw them! Starve the little SNOWFLAKES! Make them get out of mommy and daddy basement, and get a friggin job! These people need YOU, which means hose their LEFTIST rearends. Lets get USMB people off the welfare rolls, ala Reagan. Never, EVER respond to an ASTRO TURFER! As long as they are NOT in the response thread, they get NO MONEY FOR BEING LIBERAL ASSH****! Soooooooooooo, never, ever........never ever...........reply with them in the message, lol. What you do, is reply directly, nobody being responded to.
You made Hitlery pay, you made Obowelmovement pay, now it is time you make Winger, Jake, and the rest of the PAID POSTERS get hosed! No money, moolla, cash, denero,pesos, or anything else for them! Hose the little twirps, and hose them NOW by ignoring them-)
Mac1958
Diamond Member
Identity Politics is silly and counter-productive.
.
If she had small tits and looked like her dad, you wouldn't even come close to that idea of yours.I'm all in for Ivanka in 2024. Who's with me?
FA_Q2
Gold Member
Because that is all you can see that is all anyone can see?If she had small tits and looked like her dad, you wouldn't even come close to that idea of yours.I'm all in for Ivanka in 2024. Who's with me?
Yes, exactly.Because that is all you can see that is all anyone can see?If she had small tits and looked like her dad, you wouldn't even come close to that idea of yours.I'm all in for Ivanka in 2024. Who's with me?
American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
...
American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
Don't forget the brother's lol we could have Trumps till 2040...I'm all in for Ivanka in 2024. Who's with me?
DariusPerez
Rookie
I didn't think that it can be so funny. I like to "thin humor" and respect everyone who can understand it right without insult.
Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,286
- 2,320
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Came upon this and re-read it.
27 "Funnys" I laughed again myself.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Came upon this and re-read it.
27 "Funnys" I laughed again myself.
28!
PredFan
Diamond Member
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Came upon this and re-read it.
27 "Funnys" I laughed again myself.
Thanks for pointing that out again. It never stops being funny.
Hossfly
ZIONIST
Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
lol, how many people can it be said of that make the above quote true, I can only think one for myself, and we ran her against him and got what we were asking for.
Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
That actually made me feel good...the author of the piece is somewhat of an amateur by left wing standards, claiming the election was based on misogyny and racism while leaving out xenephobia as reasons hillary lost is just pure bush league journalism from someone who would like to prove their left wing chops
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
Operation Economic Fury....US preparing to board Iran-linked ships- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
-
Fraud allegations rock Maine, California as Dems push bill to criminalize investigative journalism
- Started by Hollie
- Replies: 17
