It's Looking More And More As If -whistleblower

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
52,766
Reaction score
22,245
Points
2,320
- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.

:auiqs.jpg:

I love the smell of nonsense in the morning. Smells like ... comedy.
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.

Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost
I can see why they're being protected. Too many Trump supporters are violent sh*ts.

Fake video of Trump shooting his critics and the news media shown at his resort according to New York Times - CNNPolitics
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.


Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost
And you concluded from the article that there is no WB? Man, you are funny.
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.


Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost
And you concluded from the article that there is no WB? Man, you are funny.

Re-read that.
No actual whistleblower
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.


Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost
And you concluded from the article that there is no WB? Man, you are funny.

I've reached no conclusion. Merely a suspicion based upon the behavior of Adam Schiff.

Conversely, there may be an entity coached to play the role of whistleblower. It will come out eventually.
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.

Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost
I can see why they're being protected. Too many Trump supporters are violent sh*ts.

Fake video of Trump shooting his critics and the news media shown at his resort according to New York Times - CNNPolitics

NYC's 'Shakespeare In The Park' Stages Mock Trump Assassination During Summer Production Of 'Julius Caesar'
 
I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.
Logic clearlyil isn't your long suit.

The transcipt of the conversation the alleged Blower blew about is public.

And it exonerates Trump.
 
There never was a WB. This is just another BS STORY like the DIRTY DOSSIER RUSSIAN COLLUSION HOAX in an ONGOING COUP perpetrated by the UNHINGED, DESPERATE, CORRUPT, FILTHY democraps to REMOVE President Trump from office, because they KNOW they can't beat him in a LEGAL, FAIR ELECTION.

Democrats are the party of trash.
 
Last edited:
- there is no actual whistleblower.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.


Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost

It would explain the "Double Secret" nature of the "hearings"
 
"The Committee Chairman", starring Adam Schiff as the Shopkeeper.

 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.


Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost

It would explain the "Double Secret" nature of the "hearings"
Ya... who conducts an impeachment inquiry in SECRET? If you think you have legitimate reason to hold an impeachment inquiry into the president of the United States, wouldn't you want it to be as open and transparent as possible? WHAT ARE THE DEMOCRATS HIDING? Why don't they HOLD A VOTE?

I think EVERYONE knows EXACTLY what kind of BS CORRUPT GAMES the democraps are playing, and it's going to BLOW UP IN THEIR FACE next year at the ballet box.
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday it may not be necessary to have the whistleblower who first filed a complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine testify before Congress, saying there were still major concerns about the person’s safety.


Adam Schiff Says Whistleblower May Not Testify, Safety ‘Primary Interest’ | HuffPost
And you concluded from the article that there is no WB? Man, you are funny.
Please.... just get it over with. You have been impeaching Trump since 1999. Or it seems like that.
 
- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.
Proven what? Give us the exact thing Trump did and the evidence. I’ve been asking for weeks and all you Leftards can do is say orange man bad.
 
There never was a WB. This is just another BS STORY like the DIRTY DOSSIER RUSSIAN COLLUSION HOAX in an ONGOING COUP perpetrated by the UNHINGED, DESPERATE, CORRUPT, FILTHY democraps to REMOVE President Trump from office, because they KNOW they can't beat him in a LEGAL, FAIR ELECTION.

Democrats are the party of trash.
72303274_10214834404189325_8651616859310784512_n.webp
 
Related:

Appearing on CBS's Face The Nation Sunday morning, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff essentially conceded that there was no quid pro quo between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by saying "there doesn't need to be a quid pro quo."
Did Adam Schiff Just Admit There Was No Quid Pro Quo?
 
Back
Top Bottom