It was an insurrection. The insurrectionists said so.

bripat9643

Roseanne Boyland was murdered by 'rioters' that trampled her on their way into the Capital.
Thank you for recognizing that Boyland was in FACT murdered by 'the Peaceful Rioters"
 
Once the electoral count was stopped thewre were a number of options being bandied about by the Trump Admin.

One was the Eastman plan

The other was referred to as the Greenbay Sweep

Either accept alternative slates of electors and thus declare Trump the winner

Simply disallow any "contested" slates of electors creating a tie and throwing the election to the House where not members but STATES are counted...giving Trump the win

Should the mob really go wild...declare martial law and then everything gets thrown into a cocked hat

Interesting.
This article agrees with you.
{...

What happens if there is a tie in the Electoral College? (2020)​

Although it has never happened, it is theoretically possible that the 538 electoral votes could be evenly split between two candidates, resulting in a 269-269 tie. According to the 12th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the newly-elected House of Representatives would determine the winner. The House would also decide the election if no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes. This has happened once since the passage of the 12th Amendment, in 1824.[1] In the case of either situation, the process would be as follows:
  • States certify the results of each of their November 3, 2020, popular votes and appoint electors based on these results.
  • Electors meet in their state on December 14, 2020, to cast their votes. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have laws requiring electors to vote based on the statewide popular vote. However, there is no Constitutional or federal law requiring electors to do so.[2]
  • The newly-elected 117th Congress meets in joint session on January 6, 2021, to count the electoral votes. In the case of a tie, the House becomes responsible for electing the President, while the Senate is responsible for the Vice-President.[3]
  • Choosing from the three candidates who received the most electoral votes for President, each state delegation in the House casts one vote. A majority of votes (26) are needed to win. The District of Columbia does not cast a vote.
  • Choosing between the two candidates who received the most electoral votes for Vice-President, each Senator casts a vote, with a majority (51) needed to win.[4] Due to these separate votes, it is possible that a President and Vice President from different parties could be elected.
  • If necessary, the House will continue to vote until one candidate receives a majority. This process has a Constitutional deadline of March 4. If the House does not select a new President by March 4, the Vice President-elect serves as acting President.
What does this mean for 2020?
While the Democrats hold a 232-198-1 majority in the House before the election, the fact that each state delegation only casts one vote gives Republicans an advantage. If the current partisanship breakdown carries over into the next Congress, Republicans would have a 26-23 majority of state delegations, with Pennsylvania split 9-9. If Pennsylvania's delegation cannot agree on a presidential choice, the delegation will not be allowed to vote.[5]
...}
 
Not necessarily. Charges may still be filed when the planning of it is better understood. They are still wading through the lower offenders. There’s nothing stopping additional charges on those already charged if they are found to be part of a plot.

If there were any current evidence of an insurrection, then insurrection charges would have already been filed.
The fact none were, means there currently is no evidence of an insurrection.
But I agree more could be discovered and additional charges later.
However I doubt it.

The same reason there is not likely an insurrection conspiracy is the same reason there likely was no election fraud.
It would take too many people and leak too likely.
 
Wrong. Stop lying.
The police were overwhelmed.

Tell me how they got to the front of the line, and trump supporters just let the police beat her.
It's not true, that's why.

Earlier, the story was that police pushed from behind, and caused Boyland to be trampled by her own supporters.

Now your story (LIE) changes again, and NOW you are claiming that police had a Clear Path to beat her, and surrounding trump supporters did nothing to stop it.

You are challenging trump on total number of LIES.
 
The police were overwhelmed.

Tell me how they got to the front of the line, and trump supporters just let the police beat her.
It's not true, that's why.

Earlier, the story was that police pushed from behind, and caused Boyland to be trampled by her own supporters.

Now your story (LIE) changes again, and NOW you are claiming that police had a Clear Path to beat her, and surrounding trump supporters did nothing to stop it.

You are challenging trump on total number of LIES.
The police were overwhelmed because Pelosi turned down Trump's offer of the National Guard. Also Trump supporters respect the police. That is why it happened.
 

Seditious conspiracy

There goes THAT talking point
Awesome.

I have posted this and quoted this to the RWI's that claimed,
"Where are the sedition charges."
"Why has no one been charged with sedition or insurrection."

No responses YET.
Those cowards have no balls to admit they were wrong.
 
The police were overwhelmed because Pelosi turned down Trump's offer of the National Guard. Also Trump supporters respect the police. That is why it happened.
Another FUCKING lie, you POS.
Trump supporters respect the police. LOOOLLOOOLLLLOL
Is that why there is video of them beating the police.
 
Do you know that you come off like a fucking brain damaged psycho?
Drools the USMB's fucking moron.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
I also described many other activities that would fall under that same definition, CHAD being the prime example.
Huh?? CHAD delayed the certification of the 2020 election??

I'm sure they didn't. But you said Trump's violent mob of domestic terrorists did and that meets the criteria for seditious conspiracy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top