It could be a bad-bad day for the Democrats

[SweetTea]

Their efforts were limited to public health information. Hardly a partisan effort.

Yeah, that and information about his son that would have negatively affected the election.

 

[Frankenstein]

It makes absolutely no difference what kind of deal Trump reaches with China.

To MAGA, it will be the most amazing thing in the world.

They’re all Trump boot lickers.

Right on cue, the America haters are showing up well done Chicom!

 

[SweetTea]

Tesla and SpaceX are different companies, genius.

And? My point was that Elon is running them. You think Tesla is poorly run and faking stories but SpaceX isnt?

 

[Frankenstein]

With the media reporting over 90% negative over him. He is doing good in my book, no democrat could survive that.

No Democrat will ever have to, unless the say something Christian, or pro traditional marriage, or pro life

 

[Marener]

Yeah, that and information about his son that would have negatively affected the election.

For starters, Biden wasn’t in government in 2020.

 

[leftwinger]

Stain loved EV (especially Tesla) until they found out Elon uses common sense.//

 

[SweetTea]

For starters, Biden wasn’t in government in 2020.

Right, it was the Democratic machine at work. Fascism at work, but you don't care unless it's Trump.

 

[Meister]

The hell he does. He’s centralizing a shit ton of power in the presidency.

He’s trying to control states by using federal funding to get what he wants.

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding Is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic | ACLU

Donald Trump's attempts to withhold vital funding to bully and coerce states into compliance is plainly unconstitutional.

www.aclu.org

If you have to use the ACLU as your source, you've already lost the discussion, darling.
One thing that you've lost other than your moral compass, is 'rule of law'.
He's just trying to reset the rules of this country back in place. But, you lack the
IQ to even understand that.
Have a good day, dear.

 

[Marener]

And? My point was that Elon is running them. You think Tesla is poorly run and faking stories but SpaceX isnt?

SpaceX has nothing to do with the value of Tesla stock.

The issues with Tesla are numerous and varied, but the point is that they’re dramatically overvalued even in a best case scenario. There just isn’t much demand for autonomous robots (if they ever get them to work) and autonomous taxis (they’re already behind Google with a product that is likely inferior).

 

[Marener]

If you have to use the ACLU as your source, you've already lost the discussion, darling.
One thing that you've lost other than your moral compass, is 'rule of law'.
He's just trying to reset the rules of this country back in place. But, you lack the
IQ to even understand that.
Have a good day, dear.

Ad hominem attacks are not a mark of someone winning an argument.

Trump is centralizing power in the presidency. He’s rewarding his allies and punishing his enemies. Just like a fascist would.

 

[Marener]

Right, it was the Democratic machine at work. Fascism at work, but you don't care unless it's Trump.

So right off the bat, you’re wrong.

Second, the FBI never said anything about the laptop, which is consistent with bureau policy.

You have nothing to say about Trump trying to punish law firms that took cases against him?

 

[SweetTea]

Ad hominem attacks are not a mark of someone winning an argument.

Trump is centralizing power in the presidency. He’s rewarding his allies and punishing his enemies. Just like a fascist would.

Examples?

 

[Meister]

Ad hominem attacks are not a mark of someone winning an argument.

Trump is centralizing power in the presidency. He’s rewarding his allies and punishing his enemies. Just like a fascist would.

Whatever you say.

 

[SweetTea]

Second, the FBI never said anything about the laptop, which is consistent with bureau policy.

That's not what Zuckerberg said.

You have nothing to say about Trump trying to punish law firms that took cases against him?

I don't know anything about it.

 

[Marener]

Examples?

Punishing law firms who took cases against him.

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/13/g-s1-59497/trump-law-firms-pro-bono

Rewarding crypto-bros who supported his presidency.

https://thecyberwire.com/newsletters/caveat-briefing/3/9

 

[Marener]

That's not what Zuckerberg said.

Zuckerberg was talking out of both sides of his mouth. He said they made the choice. The FBI never said anything about the laptop story, but gave them the impression that Russia would try some disinformation. You need to actually listen to what he said.

Still never shown that it had anything to do with Dems and partisan goals.

I don't know anything about it.

Because you live in a closed right wing media ecosystem.

 

[Marener]

Whatever you say.

Take a look at what Trump is doing to Harvard and tell me he’s not seizing power.

Harvard won’t comply with Trump administration’s demands — Harvard Gazette

“The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” says President Garber.

news.harvard.edu

 

[my2¢]

Whatever the media's take on the deal won't change the facts. The import/export numbers will shortly tell the tale for those that prefer to ignore the media and assess the situation for themselves.

 

[SweetTea]

Punishing law firms who took cases against him.

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/13/g-s1-59497/trump-law-firms-pro-bono

Rewarding crypto-bros who supported his presidency.

https://thecyberwire.com/newsletters/caveat-briefing/3/9

I stopped after the NPR article. What a biased load of crap. NPR is a joke.

Firms taking on pro bono work that is politically motivated is wrong. Of course you can't see that.

 

[Marener]

I stopped after the NPR article. What a biased load of crap. NPR is a joke.

Firms taking on pro bono work that is politically motivated is wrong. Of course you can't see that.

Your indoctrination is showing. It’s preventing you from taking information from outside your bubble.

We can debate if they were “politically motivated” or not, but aren’t private law firms allowed to have political motivations? It’s a free country after all.