Is this the last gasp for Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

I do not post this with glee.

------------------------

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg announced Friday she has been treated for liver cancer and will continue receiving treatment, but she plans to do her job full steam ahead as long as she’s capable.

“I have often said I would remain a member of the Court as long as I can do the job full steam. I remain fully able to do that,” Justice Ginsburg said.

She said a scan in February revealed cancer lesions in her liver, and she began chemotherapy in May.

The only thing keeping her alive is knowing Trump is president.
If she croaks they'll hide her body till after the election.
 
Ruthie is the prime example for term limits for the Supreme Court
1595008224621.png
 
Government mandated? What are you whining about now?
Government mandated mental health incarceration and torture of unwanted members of crime families in mental hospitals and psychiatric wards.
SCOTUS justices get the same insurance as every other government employee
Same as poor people on Medicaid? Oh really? Do you need some Navy surgery to cut that bullshit out of your head, and cauterize the wound with boiling tar? What sort of medical instruments does the medic need for that?
 
Or to full scale war and fragmentation.
The Constitution was designed with the provision that the states were different, not unlike Europe; and the evolution of desegregation has lead to this social chaos we endure. It is an absurdity that we do not have ideological state segregation. The 2016 presidential candidate selection is proof of the absurdity, and I think Al Gore lost in home state in 2000. The founders would be quick to point this oddity, and explain that the Constitution is flawed and cannot meet the demands of diversity that the nation has evolved to, nor the relative sophistication of the society compared to the people of the 18th century.

Before a war there will be an offering of a peace agreement.
 
The Constitution was designed with the provision that the states were different, not unlike Europe; and the evolution of desegregation has lead to this social chaos we endure. It is an absurdity that we do not have ideological state segregation. The 2016 presidential candidate selection is proof of the absurdity, and I think Al Gore lost in home state in 2000. The founders would be quick to point this oddity, and explain that the Constitution is flawed and cannot meet the demands of diversity that the nation has evolved to, nor the relative sophistication of the society compared to the people of the 18th century.

Before a war there will be an offering of a peace agreement.


Ideological state segregation? What the hell is that?


There was nothing wrong with the 2016 primaries. THe 2016 primaries were fine. They were better than many before them. We had real policy debate and the people choose.


The dems, they had a problem with the way their leadership cheated the system to get Hillary the nomination, but , the dem voters took it like the good little serfs they are, and that was their choice.
 
Ideological state segregation? What the hell is that?
"Red states" would be definite conservative Republican strong-holds defined by their state charters. And "Blue states" would be strong-hold of liberal principles that are defined in their state charters. And so forth for other economic ideological organizations.

There was nothing wrong with the 2016 primaries. THe 2016 primaries were fine. They were better than many before them. We had real policy debate and the people choose.

The dems, they had a problem with the way their leadership cheated the system to get Hillary the nomination, but , the dem voters took it like the good little serfs they are, and that was their choice.
That was a problem. But I was referring to the final opposing presidential candidates were from the same state. It is hard to believe that the founders would have envisioned that possibility. And it would have been similarly difficult to anticipate that a candidate would lose his home state.
 
That doesn't change the fact what Biden said. Garland was not considered because Obama was going to be out of office after the election, no matter what. Trump made the nomination after busting Hillary's chops n 2016.
Obama still had almost a year left in his presidency. And now we have the McConnell rule...

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” ~ Mitch McConnell, February in an election year.

... which McConnell already admitted he won't hesitate to break.
 
Cancer has returned. I detest her views and rulings, but it's sad and unfortunate. She's obviously been holding on as long as Trump is president. She should have stepped down while Obama was president, although, even if Trump immediately made a nomination, the Senate Dims will simply use the same excuse that the GOP Senate minority did back in 2016, and stall the procedure based on the fact that we were so close to a presidential election.
 
Most poor people are poor because they are poor money managers.
In her statement, she would only have us refer to those Bills of Rights that reflect our era, but ignore older portions of the Constitution and further, suggests looking at Canada's government policies (apparently, she is unaware that unlike our Bill of Rights, you don't actually have the "Freedom of Speech," where people in Canada have been fined and jailed for some of their speech. People can be fined for criticizing Islam, as it has a growing influence on the Canadian government. That's not the freedom of speech. As time goes on, it becomes more and more restrictive in Canada and some have moved south of their border because of this.
 
She is trying to demonstrate the absurdity of the Constitutional provision that does allow for federal judges to remain until death. We need a new Constitution for many reasons - the Constitution sucks.
I heard that Cuba was opened by the brown turd Obammy, if the Constitution sucks, i recommend that you spend some lovely time in that Socialist Utopian Paradise, then come back and see if the Constitution still sucks....
 
I’m totally fine everyone View attachment 364385
She's working from home.
Nope, I am familiar with this cancer scenario. This cancer originated in her pancreas. She was in Sloan Kettering in NYC same time as my late spouse getting a procedure for her pancreas. Everybody was buzzing that she was there.
It will destroy her liver function.
Once it's down to 14-15% she will have only 2-3 weeks to live.
It's a horrid way to die.
This sucks so bad.
I thought it started with colo rectal. My deepest sympathies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top