Is there a Scientific Theory to explain Climate Change?

[Crick]

Sorry nuclear reactors operations do not contribute to global warming

Exactly!

To save the planet, what is the consensus on the number of new reactors we should build?

We should have one on every street corner. Have you seen that new mini that's aimed at replacing portable diesel generators? It was in the news within the last week but I can't find the article.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We should have one on every street corner. Have you seen that new mini that's aimed at replacing portable diesel generators? It was in the news within the last week but I can't find the article.

Don't tell the watermelons, they'll burst into flame.

 

[Crick]

Don't tell the watermelons, they'll burst into flame.

I would like to live long enough to see a functional, commercial fusion reactor power plant. I bet I've read a thousand Sci-Fi stories that included power from fusion reactors.

 

[psikeyhackr]

You got the charts?

Yeah, and it never happened. The current situation is unique.

 

[Crick]

Yeah, and it never happened. The current situation is unique.
View attachment 768258View attachment 768259

Temperature and CO2 for the last 500 million years. Note the correlation.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.022055499

 

[jc456]

Temperature and CO2 for the last 500 million years. Note the correlation.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.022055499

Temperature always leads co2

 

[jc456]

Yeah, and it never happened. The current situation is unique.
View attachment 768258View attachment 768259

Temperature leads co2

 

[psikeyhackr]

Temperature leads co2

Under NATURAL conditions!

Digging up up fossil fuels (carbon) and burning them is not natural. Memorizing without understanding is natural for some people.

 

[jc456]

Under NATURAL conditions!

Digging up up fossil fuels (carbon) and burning them is not natural. Memorizing without understanding is natural for some people.

Always

 

[frigidweirdo]

Because it is history and is relevant to the development of the Earth ecosystem. Ignoring past events is just cherry picking your argument. The origins of how the solar system was created is relevant to your argument. It is like reading the last chapter of a book. You can do it but you are missing out on things.

Still significant event occurred within the 400,000 year limit

Four hundred thousand years ago, extreme environmental changes rocked the East African Rift Valley. Fresh water periodically dried up, and vast grasslands faded away—taking with them the large grazing animals hunted by early humans. But ecological instability didn’t drive people out of the region or into extinction. Instead, it sparked them to adapt with major leaps forward in their behavior and culture. Early humans developed more sophisticated stone tools and weapons, expanded trade networks, and even evidenced the growth of symbolic communication.

To Adapt to a Changing Environment 400,000 Years Ago, Early Humans Developed New Tools and Behaviors



2014 comet exploded over Russia.

In 1908 an approximately 30-meter-diameter asteroid or comet entered the atmosphere and exploded above ground in Tunguska, Russia. The explosion knocked down approximately 80 million trees over an area of 2,150 square kilometers (830 square miles). This explosion has been estimated at 1,000 times more powerful than the explosion of the atomic bomb at Hiroshima.

Thing is, we're in a cycle that started 400,000 years ago. What happened a million years ago with the climate no longer impacts us now. We can't say "oh, look, it was very hot during the dinosaurs' age, so now is cooler, there must be something wrong".

 

[jc456]

Thing is, we're in a cycle that started 400,000 years ago. What happened a million years ago with the climate no longer impacts us now. We can't say "oh, look, it was very hot during the dinosaurs' age, so now is cooler, there must be something wrong".

What is wrong

 

[EMH]

Your question is really... given land extending way outside of the polar circle, how far will a continent specific ice age push that ice before it melts.

That's not the question at all.

An "ice age" is a continent specific event, and it starts when the land gets to within 600 miles of a pole,

Is there land currently within 600 miles of the North Pole?
Was it there when the last glacial period began?
Is it still there?

First, the "glacial period" bullshit. The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong. The planet does not warm and cool as a whole. Climate change is about continent specific ice ages. Right now on earth

South Pole

Antarctica is within 600 miles of a pole. Any evidence of a continent specific ice age on Antarctica today??? It just has 8 million cubic miles of ice on it, 90% of Earth ice...


North Pole

Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius. What's up with Greenland, any ice there???

Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada is also there with 0.3% of Earth ice....



Let's see if you notice any difference???

Right there, it takes an IQ of 40 to figure it out. Two polar oceans, Earth has no ice. Two polar continents, Earth has 80%++ more ice and oceans are lower, atmosphere thinner etc...

What matters is where land is relative to the poles....

And land moves...

 

[Crick]

First, the "glacial period" bullshit. The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong. The planet does not warm and cool as a whole. Climate change is about continent specific ice ages. Right now on earth

South Pole

Antarctica is within 600 miles of a pole. Any evidence of a continent specific ice age on Antarctica today??? It just has 8 million cubic miles of ice on it, 90% of Earth ice...


North Pole

Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius. What's up with Greenland, any ice there???

Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada is also there with 0.3% of Earth ice....



Let's see if you notice any difference???

Right there, it takes an IQ of 40 to figure it out. Two polar oceans, Earth has no ice. Two polar continents, Earth has 80%++ more ice and oceans are lower, atmosphere thinner etc...

What matters is where land is relative to the poles....

And land moves...

Wow. And you think you're exceptionally smart because you know the answer to a question fit for fourth graders.

 

[EMH]

Wow. And you think you're exceptionally smart because you know the answer to a question fit for fourth graders.

Co2 does nothing.

That is the truth of the DATA.

The above is a theory you cannot refute, and neither could the homO Administration

 

[Crick]

Co2 does nothing.

That is the truth of the DATA.

The above is a theory you cannot refute, and neither could the homO Administration

You are the lyingest motherfucker I have EVER met.

 

[jc456]

Wow. And you think you're exceptionally smart because you know the answer to a question fit for fourth graders.

Why don’t you?

 

[Crick]

Why don’t you?

The theory that explains man-made global warming is called Anthropogenic Global Warming. Catchy, eh?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

First, the "glacial period" bullshit. The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong. The planet does not warm and cool as a whole. Climate change is about continent specific ice ages. Right now on earth

South Pole

Antarctica is within 600 miles of a pole. Any evidence of a continent specific ice age on Antarctica today??? It just has 8 million cubic miles of ice on it, 90% of Earth ice...


North Pole

Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius. What's up with Greenland, any ice there???

Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada is also there with 0.3% of Earth ice....



Let's see if you notice any difference???

Right there, it takes an IQ of 40 to figure it out. Two polar oceans, Earth has no ice. Two polar continents, Earth has 80%++ more ice and oceans are lower, atmosphere thinner etc...

What matters is where land is relative to the poles....

And land moves...

First, the "glacial period" bullshit.

Makes your claim look silly.

The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong.

If you say so. So what?

North Pole

Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius.

Then we should be in an Ice Age, right? Are we?

What matters is where land is relative to the poles....

And land moves...

How far was land from the North Pole when there was a mile of ice on top of Chicago?
How far did that land move away from the North Pole to cause the Chicago "ice cap" to melt?

 

[jc456]

The theory that explains man-made global warming is called Anthropogenic Global Warming. Catchy, eh?

That is truly a word salad that says absolutely nothing. What it doesn’t say is how much co2 does one ice car add?

 

[jc456]

How far was land from the North Pole when there was a mile of ice on top of Chicago?
How far did that land move away from the North Pole to cause the Chicago "ice cap" to melt

I asked him the same exact question a week ago. Crickets