We should have one on every street corner. Have you seen that new mini that's aimed at replacing portable diesel generators? It was in the news within the last week but I can't find the article.
Is there a Scientific Theory to explain Climate Change?
- Thread starter jwoodie
- Start date
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Don't tell the watermelons, they'll burst into flame.
I would like to live long enough to see a functional, commercial fusion reactor power plant. I bet I've read a thousand Sci-Fi stories that included power from fusion reactors.
psikeyhackr
Silver Member
- Jul 18, 2010
- 1,315
- 182
- 98
Temperature and CO2 for the last 500 million years. Note the correlation.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
Temperature always leads co2Temperature and CO2 for the last 500 million years. Note the correlation.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
Temperature leads co2
psikeyhackr
Silver Member
- Jul 18, 2010
- 1,315
- 182
- 98
Under NATURAL conditions!
Digging up up fossil fuels (carbon) and burning them is not natural. Memorizing without understanding is natural for some people.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
Always
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 50,313
- 12,213
- 2,180
Because it is history and is relevant to the development of the Earth ecosystem. Ignoring past events is just cherry picking your argument. The origins of how the solar system was created is relevant to your argument. It is like reading the last chapter of a book. You can do it but you are missing out on things.
Still significant event occurred within the 400,000 year limit
Four hundred thousand years ago, extreme environmental changes rocked the East African Rift Valley. Fresh water periodically dried up, and vast grasslands faded away—taking with them the large grazing animals hunted by early humans. But ecological instability didn’t drive people out of the region or into extinction. Instead, it sparked them to adapt with major leaps forward in their behavior and culture. Early humans developed more sophisticated stone tools and weapons, expanded trade networks, and even evidenced the growth of symbolic communication.
To Adapt to a Changing Environment 400,000 Years Ago, Early Humans Developed New Tools and Behaviors
2014 comet exploded over Russia.
In 1908 an approximately 30-meter-diameter asteroid or comet entered the atmosphere and exploded above ground in Tunguska, Russia. The explosion knocked down approximately 80 million trees over an area of 2,150 square kilometers (830 square miles). This explosion has been estimated at 1,000 times more powerful than the explosion of the atomic bomb at Hiroshima.
Thing is, we're in a cycle that started 400,000 years ago. What happened a million years ago with the climate no longer impacts us now. We can't say "oh, look, it was very hot during the dinosaurs' age, so now is cooler, there must be something wrong".
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
What is wrong
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,517
- 2,288
- Banned
- #232
First, the "glacial period" bullshit. The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong. The planet does not warm and cool as a whole. Climate change is about continent specific ice ages. Right now on earth
South Pole
Antarctica is within 600 miles of a pole. Any evidence of a continent specific ice age on Antarctica today??? It just has 8 million cubic miles of ice on it, 90% of Earth ice...
North Pole
Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius. What's up with Greenland, any ice there???
Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada is also there with 0.3% of Earth ice....
Let's see if you notice any difference???
Right there, it takes an IQ of 40 to figure it out. Two polar oceans, Earth has no ice. Two polar continents, Earth has 80%++ more ice and oceans are lower, atmosphere thinner etc...
What matters is where land is relative to the poles....
And land moves...
Wow. And you think you're exceptionally smart because you know the answer to a question fit for fourth graders.First, the "glacial period" bullshit. The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong. The planet does not warm and cool as a whole. Climate change is about continent specific ice ages. Right now on earth
South Pole
Antarctica is within 600 miles of a pole. Any evidence of a continent specific ice age on Antarctica today??? It just has 8 million cubic miles of ice on it, 90% of Earth ice...
North Pole
Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius. What's up with Greenland, any ice there???
Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada is also there with 0.3% of Earth ice....
Let's see if you notice any difference???
Right there, it takes an IQ of 40 to figure it out. Two polar oceans, Earth has no ice. Two polar continents, Earth has 80%++ more ice and oceans are lower, atmosphere thinner etc...
What matters is where land is relative to the poles....
And land moves...
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
Why don’t you?
The theory that explains man-made global warming is called Anthropogenic Global Warming. Catchy, eh?
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
First, the "glacial period" bullshit. The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong. The planet does not warm and cool as a whole. Climate change is about continent specific ice ages. Right now on earth
South Pole
Antarctica is within 600 miles of a pole. Any evidence of a continent specific ice age on Antarctica today??? It just has 8 million cubic miles of ice on it, 90% of Earth ice...
North Pole
Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius. What's up with Greenland, any ice there???
Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada is also there with 0.3% of Earth ice....
Let's see if you notice any difference???
Right there, it takes an IQ of 40 to figure it out. Two polar oceans, Earth has no ice. Two polar continents, Earth has 80%++ more ice and oceans are lower, atmosphere thinner etc...
What matters is where land is relative to the poles....
And land moves...
First, the "glacial period" bullshit.
Makes your claim look silly.
The truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed proves the idiocy of the Co2 Fraud and its taxpayer funded "skeptic bull" solar cycle is wrong.
If you say so. So what?
North Pole
Northern tip of Greenland is in the 600 mile "switch" radius.
Then we should be in an Ice Age, right? Are we?
What matters is where land is relative to the poles....
And land moves...
How far was land from the North Pole when there was a mile of ice on top of Chicago?
How far did that land move away from the North Pole to cause the Chicago "ice cap" to melt?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
That is truly a word salad that says absolutely nothing. What it doesn’t say is how much co2 does one ice car add?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,575
- 34,656
- 2,180
I asked him the same exact question a week ago. Crickets
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Former Memphis police officers acquitted of all state charges in death of Tyre Nichols- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 0
-
3 Memphis officers found not guilty of Tyre Nichols brutal murder. But wait, there's more.
- Started by MarathonMike
- Replies: 1
-
Zone1 An Illustration of What is Meant By "Privilege"- Started by NewsVine_Mariyam
- Replies: 3
-
Alberta to leave Canada and form energy alliance with the United States?- Started by justoffal
- Replies: 3
-
