Is there a Scientific Theory to explain Climate Change?

[psikeyhackr]

History supports climate change, the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and man has never had anything to do with it, and never will unless there is all out nuclear war, and if so its effects will only be temporary in the life of our planet.

If you know so much about the history of climate change tell is when CO2 changed this fast before.

 

[psikeyhackr]

The Paleo record shows a warmup unlike no other every 110,000 years. Not once was man responsible for it. Yet here they are worrying about 1.5 deg C when 3-5 deg C is commonly seen in just the Holocene we are in today. Using even basic common sense should make you laugh at the claims being made.

Firdgwierdo posted the 450,000 years of 110,000 year cycles here: Is there a Scientific Theory to explain Climate Change?

When we look at just the current Holocene, you can see the rapid swings of temperature far exceeding the laughable BS of the IPCC.

View attachment 767878

So you don't recognize data from a single location produced by Richard Alley, not a global average. It has been used by denial clowns over and over. Why does it specify "Greenland"?

 

[jc456]

If you know so much about the history of climate change tell is when CO2 changed this fast before.

why can't you? your schtick is saying it is. What evidence do you have? Why not post the previous rises?

How convenient for you to remove your obligations?

 

[Billy_Bob]

So you don't recognize data from a single location produced by Richard Alley, not a global average. It has been used by denial clowns over and over. Why does it specify "Greenland"?

Because that is the data that was used to create it..

Your use of the term "denier" is as antiscience as it comes. I do not deny the science. The evidence is clear that CO2 Drives nothing. CO2 - By The Numbers, Why it is Statistically Irrelevant in our Atmosphere.

ETA: here is another relevant article:
Solar Dimming... What is at stake With This Change on our Sun?

 

[psikeyhackr]

Here is the 10,000 year rerun about Greenland:



And here is Richard Alley:

 

[EMH]

The trust is posted here.

Nobody can refute the plate - location of land near poles theory, because it is the correct theory.


Co2 does nothing
Sun is constant.

Earth climate dictated by tectonic plate movement...


Now, change the subject and go back to parroting fudge and fraud.....

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here is the 10,000 year rerun about Greenland:



And here is Richard Alley:

You are laughable... I posted science, repeatable, reproducible, and verifiable SCIENCE, you post up conjecture? Really... Please, you're making me laugh uncontrollably....

 

[psikeyhackr]

You are laughable... I posted science, repeatable, reproducible, and verifiable SCIENCE, you post up conjecture? Really... Please, you're making me laugh uncontrollably....

And you can toss words around. Can you actually read?

The Tyranny of Words by Stuart Chase

 

[psikeyhackr]

 

[jc456]

The trust is posted here.

Nobody can refute the plate - location of land near poles theory, because it is the correct theory.


Co2 does nothing
Sun is constant.

Earth climate dictated by tectonic plate movement...


Now, change the subject and go back to parroting fudge and fraud.....

correct, CO2 does nothing. nadda. the biggest piece of nadda since the word was invented.

 

[jc456]

what is that relevance?

 

[Billy_Bob]

what is that relevance?

There is none... more conjecture... nothing more..

 

[jc456]

There is none... more conjecture... nothing more..

just another warmer unhappy in life.

 

[jwoodie]

​

What is the difference between global warming and climate change...​

.

Thanks for answering a question I didn't ask, genius. The question I asked, but you misread, was:

Is there any scientific theory to explain why current Climate Change is different from past Climate Change?

Do YOU see the term Global Warming in that sentence? Do YOU know the difference? Are YOU that stupid?

 

[Kilroy2]

And it means exactly nothing... 0.024 deg C of potential when we were expecting 2.1 deg C. This means man's contribution after all other natural factors are removed, is not detectable or cannot be discerned from noise in the system.

Sources as the link you provide really just states that the Sun is not the cause of global warming but mans activities is.

But several lines of evidence show that current global warming cannot be explained by changes in energy from the Sun:

that is what your source states and the title

Human Activity Is the Cause of Increased Greenhouse Gas Concentrations​

 

[jc456]

Sources as the link you provide really just states that the Sun is not the cause of global warming but mans activities is.

But several lines of evidence show that current global warming cannot be explained by changes in energy from the Sun:

that is what your source states and the title

Human Activity Is the Cause of Increased Greenhouse Gas Concentrations​

how much carbon comes from one ice vehicle?

one jet?

One coal power plant?

Post the figures.

 

[Sunsettommy]

If you know so much about the history of climate change tell is when CO2 changed this fast before.

It is irrelevant how fast it goes up because the warm forcing effect at the 430 ppm level is negligible.

 

[Kilroy2]

And yet CO2 has gone through the roof, but temperatures aren't higher than they were the last times we had a huge increase in temperatures (every 100,000 years or so).

Why?

Also, temperatures and CO2 rose in the past, then they hit a peak. If CO2 always makes temperatures go higher, then temperatures would have kept rising, but they didn't CO2 hit a point and then temperature plummeted.

Well the forming of a planet and the solar system would cause ups and downs as it is developing. They think that there were at least 5 ice ages. Ice has the capacity to reflect more heat back into space. Continents were breaking off and new ones forming. Oceans undergoing changes. So there is a lot going on in the beginning. Still this is just temperatures in the Antarctica. Which because it is located at the bottom of the earth. The amount of sunlight is limited.

It is believed that Dinosaur's became extinct because of meteor strikes.

Still your map shows that high levels of CO2 are related to higher temperatures. Also that the higher levels are related to man's activities.

 

[Kilroy2]

how much carbon comes from one ice vehicle?

one jet?

One coal power plant?

Post the figures.

Really you want to make a point with only the number one. Sorry one is a lonely number. So lets be real about it.


The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that in 2019, the United States emitted 5,130 million metric tons of energy-related carbon dioxide, while the global emissions of energy-related carbon dioxide totaled 33,621.5 million metric tons.

Total Emissions in 2020 = 5,981 Million Metric Tons of CO2 equivalent. Percentages may not add up to 100% due to independent rounding.

Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions | US EPA

Sources of greenhouse gas emissions, inculding electricity production, tranportation, industry, agriculture, and forestry.

www.epa.gov

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well the forming of a planet and the solar system would cause ups and downs as it is developing. They think that there were at least 5 ice ages. Ice has the capacity to reflect more heat back into space. Continents were breaking off and new ones forming. Oceans undergoing changes. So there is a lot going on in the beginning. Still this is just temperatures in the Antarctica. Which because it is located at the bottom of the earth. The amount of sunlight is limited.

It is believed that Dinosaur's became extinct because of meteor strikes.

Still your map shows that high levels of CO2 are related to higher temperatures. Also that the higher levels are related to man's activities.

Yes, at the "beginning", I'm talking the last 400,000 years.