Is there a double standard for prosecuting Trump but not Biden for classified documents?

[excalibur]

Yes.

Even worse than that. Biden had no right whereas Trump was a President. Trump also has the PRA on his side as well as the Clinton sock drawer tapes case, which the DOJ forcefully argued in favor of Clinton, and the DC Circuit concurred in that argument.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Synthaholic]

No. Trump lied to the DoJ about having the documents, then about returning all of the documents. That's bad intent.

Trump obstructed justice. Biden cooperated fully.

 

[Crepitus]

Yes.

No. Not even close. The cases bear almost not resemblance to each other. tRump is not being prosecuted for accidentally removing some documents from their proper location. He is being prosecuted because he lied about having them, refused to give them back, tried to hide them, conspired to hide them, bragged about having them, and showed them to many unapproved people, possibly even selling the information on the for profit or favors.

It's disingenuous in the extreme for you to even try to draw parallels between the two incidents.

 

[Crepitus]

YOur butthurt is showing.

 

[White 6]

Yes.

Even worse than that. Biden had no right whereas Trump was a President. Trump also has the PRA on his side as well as the Clinton sock drawer tapes case, which the DOJ forcefully argued in favor of Clinton, and the DC Circuit concurred in that argument.

No. If you do not have the evidence, and do not think it is a winnable case, you do not prosecute.
So, the accused is presumed innocent. That is the law, and the only thing that counts in this country.

 

[Oddball]

No. Not even close. The cases bear almost not resemblance to each other. tRump is not being prosecuted for accidentally removing some documents from their proper location. He is being prosecuted because he lied about having them, refused to give them back, tried to hide them, conspired to hide them, bragged about having them, and showed them to many unapproved people, possibly even selling the information on the for profit or favors.

It's disingenuous in the extreme for you to even try to draw parallels between the two incidents.

"Accidentally"....

 

[Crepitus]

"Accidentally"....

View attachment 916364

That's what your Orange goD claimed initially.

 

[pknopp]

There is also the double standard here of constantly complaining about "grooming" but still using Dershowitz to make an argument.

I guess it's OK as long as you claim you left your underwear on.

 

[Oddball]

That's what your Orange goD claimed initially.

Never voted for the dude, so GFY.

 

[Crepitus]

Never voted for the dude, so GFY.

And yet you spend all day here licking his ass for him.

Strange.

 

[progressive hunter]

No. Not even close. The cases bear almost not resemblance to each other. tRump is not being prosecuted for accidentally removing some documents from their proper location. He is being prosecuted because he lied about having them, refused to give them back, tried to hide them, conspired to hide them, bragged about having them, and showed them to many unapproved people, possibly even selling the information on the for profit or favors.

It's disingenuous in the extreme for you to even try to draw parallels between the two incidents.

he didnt accidentally take them home,, he took them to write a book and knew he had them the whole time,, he even allowed someone without a security clearance to read them and they deleted stuff to hide the crime,,

we dont believe you,,

 

[progressive hunter]

And yet you spend all day here licking his ass for him.

Strange.

youre the one with his tongue up trumps ass not us,,

if trump made a sudden stop it would take a horse to pull your head out of his ass,,

 

[Crepitus]

youre the one with his tongue up trumps ass not us,,

if trump made a sudden stop it would take a horse to pull your head out of his ass,,

Lol, sure sure. Lets' go with that.

And wipe that orange off your nose.

 

[otto105]

Yes.

Even worse than that. Biden had no right whereas Trump was a President. Trump also has the PRA on his side as well as the Clinton sock drawer tapes case, which the DOJ forcefully argued in favor of Clinton, and the DC Circuit concurred in that argument.

Hilarious

 

[excalibur]

Hilarious

 

[Care4all]

No. Not even close. The cases bear almost not resemblance to each other. tRump is not being prosecuted for accidentally removing some documents from their proper location. He is being prosecuted because he lied about having them, refused to give them back, tried to hide them, conspired to hide them, bragged about having them, and showed them to many unapproved people, possibly even selling the information on the for profit or favors.

It's disingenuous in the extreme for you to even try to draw parallels between the two incidents.

And defied a grand jury subpoena, and falsely signed an affidavit that all documents were returned, and tried to destroy video evidence....and moved about 20 cases from Mara Lago to Bedminster....the day the FBI was there to pick up all the documents.

 

[Crepitus]

And defied a grand jury subpoena, and falsely signed an affidavit that all documents were returned, and tried to destroy video evidence....and moved about 20 cases from Mara Lago to Bedminster....the day the FBI was there to pick up all the documents.

Thanks for adding that.

 

[otto105]

Yup, you haven't read the transcript.

Another maga fuckup

 

[Care4all]

he didnt accidentally take them home,, he took them to write a book and knew he had them the whole time,, he even allowed someone without a security clearance to read them and they deleted stuff to hide the crime,,

we dont believe you,,

Link?