Professor Alexander Fraser Tyler
wrote this when the states were still colonies of Great Britain.
He explained why democracies fail
A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess of the public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship.
Largess means liberal giving of money.
This is exactly why our founders did not want us to be a Democracy in any way shape or form.
This is what they meant in their papers when they wrote that democracies always fail.
Democracy has many different meanings.
I am a NZer and we have a democracy and it has not failed. I now live in Australia, which is also a democracy, which also has not failed.
Ditto most of western Europe.
Note that we all have different forms of govt. With the uK it is FPP, with NZ is is MMP, with you guys it is a Republic. But they are all forms of democracy.
And obviously Tyler was wrong....
And I could give a good argument that your form of democracy has/is failed/failing...