- Dec 16, 2017
- 17,678
- 8,759
- 475
My stance is, as I've said before, the reason it appears to be a coup is because if the left's early telegraphing of their desire and intentions of removing him from office. The left was making these statements pretty much before he was inaugurated. It just appears, at least on the surface, that the left's intentions have nothing to do with what's right and what is justice, they simply want him gone because they dont like him.Ok, so the Obama administration tells public schools they have to let transgender students use the bathroom of their choice.The reason people think it's a coup is because, the Democrats left no doubt their goal was to remove trump. Even before an investigation had started, the dems had him pegged as guilty and were talking removal. Heck, I think even before his inauguration there were some already talking about methods of removing him.
You see, impeachment is necessary for high crimes, but when you broadcast how badly you want him gone, and all of the rhetoric and hate that has been pointed his direction, its starts to look more like a coup.
So kind of like the one over that birther hoax some crazy new york billionaire made up?
Or transgender bathrooms being an impeachable offense?
The best was the Texas Republican pushing for his impeachment... His reasoning... not even a claim of anything illegal. Just to prevent him from "pushing his agenda" was the case.
High crimes? Or did Republicans start the desire for a coup against the US government? Or is it only if the process doesn't follow the constitutional guidelines?
Ok, you are over the place with this.
Trump didn't start birther movement, Hillary did. Yeah, trump ran with it for awhile,
The transgender bathroom bit was from Dennis Kucinich, who is a Democrat.
And yes, an impeachment should follow constitutional guidelines.
Some in Oklahoma statehouse urge Obama impeachment over bathroom rule - Reuters
Oops. Sorry Republicans on record there. So sorry but that lie didn't hold up. Kucinich said about Libya.
Hillary didn't. In fact she fired the person on her campaign who tried to run with it and never called for impeachment over it (kinda impossible to as he wasn't president).
Also Trump not Hillary was the one who suggested impeachment over it (and some republican congressmen like Farenthold). Trump however ran with it with dozens of tweets calling for impeachment, or as we consider now, an attempted coup against a sitting president of the United States.
Next time get your facts straight kiddo. Then it won't be so confusing to you.
While I dont think that rises to the level of impeachment, but it was a stupid move. Most parents are not going to think kindly of schools letting boys into the girls bathroom.
Agree. But if it doesn't rise to the level of impeachment does that make talk of potential legal impeachment over something not meeting the burden of proof for impeachment automatically an attempted coup by those who promote it?
That's kind of my point here. If calling for an impeachment proceeding against Trump over unfounded accusations is an attempted coup, that has happened multiple times to Obama, including... By Trump.
If you want one, you have to have both. So you get a paradox. Trump attempted a coup against Obama, therefore impeachment talk about Trump is now valid because we have defined that as an attempted coup vs a sitting president, which is a crime that would now meet the standard to impeach trump...
Unless you are one of those who say it's ok for my party to do X but not yours (which happens a lot on both sides)
This much is obvious due to the amount of hate and vitriol thrown his way on a daily basis.