must be failed leadership. What's it called when a gang of House freshmen hold the credit worthiness of the United States of America hostage to protect the tax breaks and loopholes millionaires enjoy? Responsible leadership?
They are? I thought they were trying to implement much needed cuts so that America wouldn't have to keep raising the debt limit over and over again.
Expenditures are part of the equation. Enforcing the tax code, eliminating loopholes enjoyed only by the rich and raising the tax rates to those the rich prospered under during the Clinton years would also bring in much needed revenues.
Unless that agenda is specifically about kow towing to the wealthy and punishing the poor and elderly.
Why can't they simply raise the debt ceiling, thus avoiding a calamitous fiscal mistake, and take a balanced approach to the budget later? Or is it hunting season and the Social Security recipients are prized game?