Is Kelly Hayes next?

[Seymour Flops]

BREAKING: Prosecutors recently told DOJ there is not enough evidence to prosecute Sen. Adam Schiff​

BREAKING: Prosecutors recently told DOJ there is not enough evidence to prosecute Sen. Adam Schiff​

Ken Dilanian, MSNBC Justice and Intel Correspondent and Alex Wagner, Contributing Host on Pod Save America join Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with reaction to the breaking news reported by MSNBC that the prosecutor charged with investigating Sen. Adam Schiff has concluded that there is...

www.msnbc.com

Uh oh. Must be time for trump to fire another prosecutor.

Absolutely.

Sad that the DOJ was so weaponized by Obama holdovers acting with no checks and balances during the dementia administration that they cannot be trusted anymore.

But the solution is to get rid of the ones who cannot be trusted, not to pretend they are trustworthy to avoid hurting berg80's feelings.

 

[berg80]

Absolutely.

Sad that the DOJ was so weaponized by Obama holdovers acting with no checks and balances during the dementia administration that they cannot be trusted anymore.

But the solution is to get rid of the ones who cannot be trusted, not to pretend they are trustworthy to avoid hurting berg80's feelings.

Or......there isn't enough evidence to charge Schiff with a crime, and you are full of shyte.

 

[BackAgain]

Wow. Very verbose post from a very self-satisfied bug.

As I was plunging into it, suddenly, I realized something. What was I doing?

And the words of the late Meat Loaf came to mind:

“You’ll never oil on a sandy beach.”

The fact is, that any one prosecutors does have a right — and in some cases a duty — to refuse to seek an indictment. In fact, if that’s what she truly believes, then of course she is free to act accordingly. But she has a boss. And the fact is that the boss might feel differently. So, guess what? Actions, as well as decisions not to act, can rightly have consequences.

What’s the big deal? If a replacement prosecutor ends up prosecuting Schiff, so what? It’s ultimately still up to a jury and the appellate process.

In the meanwhile, prosecutors can actually disagree.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Or......there isn't enough evidence to charge Schiff with a crime, and you are full of shyte.

If Schiff is innocent, he has nothing to worrry about.

 

[berg80]

If Schiff is innocent, he has nothing to worrry about.

Translation; you see no problem with the POTUS telling the AG to find something with which to prosecute his political adversaries. Potentially causing them to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to defend themselves against baseless charges. And when prosecutors in an US Attorney's office can't find anything sufficient to charge an enemy of trump's with, that prosecutor knows there's a likelihood he or she will be fired.

All of which makes you as much a threat to pursuit of equal justice as the orange piece of shit is.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Translation; you see no problem with the POTUS telling the AG to find something with which to prosecute his political adversaries.

You admit that James Comey is Trump's political adversary?

I thought the claim was that he was a dispassionate and unbiased law enforcement officer?

You're saying the quiet part out loud, berg. Did you get ANY sleep last night?

Potentially causing them to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to defend themselves against baseless charges.

You know of anyone that happened to in the last nine years?

And when prosecutors in an US Attorney's office can't find anything sufficient to charge an enemy of trump's with, that prosecutor knows there's a likelihood he or she will be fired.

The president was elected, in part, to mold the DOJ to his vision. Listen to the will of the people. If those prosecutors had not been so obvious with their bias during the last nine years, their jobs would be safe.

They stopped even bothering to hide it during the Autopen Administration, not dreaming that Trump would make such a stunning comeback.

Those prosecutors will be lucky if they are only fired, and not prosecuted themselves.

All of which makes you as much a threat to pursuit of equal justice as the orange piece of shit is.

Are you dreaming of shooting me in the throat?

 

[berg80]

You admit that James Comey is Trump's political adversary?

Yes, because trump targeted him for retribution after Comey exercised his free speech right to be critical of trump. Why do you seem to be confused about these simple concepts?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Yes, because trump targeted him for retribution after Comey exercised his free speech right to be critical of trump. Why do you seem to be confused about these simple concepts?

I thought for a monent that you would be honest.

 

[berg80]

I thought for a monent that you would be honest.

You'll never come to grips with reality if you view the truth as dishonesty.

 

[struth]

Inside Trump's DOJ: Punitive firings, public scoldings and pressure to prosecute foes​

Kelly O. Hayes, a career prosecutor serving as Trump’s acting U.S. attorney in Maryland, has been facing intense pressure and questions for weeks from Ed Martin, a Trump ally tapped to run the newly formed weaponization task force at the department, about when she will bring criminal charges against Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

She has chosen to move forward with a case she feels has merit and that will also be welcomed by the White House: to prosecute Trump’s former national security adviser John Bolton on charges related to mishandling classified information. Hayes has told colleagues she believes some charges against Bolton are reasonable and warranted, a case involving mishandling of classified information that began under the Biden administration, according to MSNBC sources.

But Hayes’ office has been interviewing witnesses in a grand jury probe examining allegations that Schiff defrauded a bank related to financing for a second home in Maryland and is bracing for being fired herself when she explains that there are insufficient facts to bring such a case against the U.S. senator, the sources said.

Inside Trump's DOJ: Punitive firings, public scoldings and pressure to prosecute foes

But Trump political appointees say U.S. attorneys installed by the president are "trusted and empowered to diligently uphold the rule of law."

www.msnbc.com

This may be one of those moments when the view from 40,000 ft. is required to provide some perspective. While I'm somewhat hesitant to write out this list since it loses its impact when each item isn't given the full consideration it needs, it gets the point across.

The prez has cut funding for projects in blue states previously authorized by Congress in order to punish Dem's for having the audacity to disagree with him on politics.

He has sent federal troops in the cities run by Dem's in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

He has ordered the prosecution of political adversaries.

He has ordered the firing of US Attorney's who could not find enough evidence to indict said adversaries.

He has initiated a restrictive press policy at the Pentagon so outrageous it resulted in reporters walking out en masse.



He has initiated an immigration policy favorable to white people.

He has asked red states to gerrymander districts in order to advantage Repubs in the midterms.

He has routinely sought to expand presidential power beyond constitutional limits.

He has ordered the execution of 27 people in international waters without evidence of a crime and without a legal justification.

I am of the belief it will take Republicans to stand up and say "this in un-American and it can't go on," perhaps even a member of the cabinet, in order to jolt his supporters in to realizing just how far down the rabbit hole trump has taken us.

Let the grand jury decide. If she undermines the process, and cuts them off, then she should be fired.

 

[Rawley]

Or......there isn't enough evidence to charge Schiff with a crime, and you are full of shyte.

They've briefed you on the evidence. Kewl. How did you arrange that?

 

[Rawley]

Translation; you see no problem with the POTUS telling the AG to find something with which to prosecute his political adversaries.

LOL "We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by, if we, if he does run. I'm making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again."