Said1
Gold Member
Sure,sure flamming Blabberella is fun and all, but I think it's ignore time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Said1 said:Sure,sure flamming Blabberella is fun and all, but I think it's ignore time.
jimnyc said:Hmmm..... I forgot about that option. Yes, I have received a bunch of complaints about her. But I also received hundreds of complaints in the past about being to judgemental about liberals and that it would ultimately be back slapping neo-cons here! LOL
I'm just trying to keep it equal all the way around. I guess I should have advised a few of the other users to use the ignore option!
jimnyc said:She really hasn't broken any of the written rules we set forth. Yes, she whines, she offers unsubstantiated opinion and rarely, if ever, debates or deals in fact. But, she does somewhat stay on topic.
Example... New user 'nucular' wanting to know all about how the 'prez' pronounces this word. There are varying degrees of trolls. I'd rather deal with the slightly more intelligent yet stubborn, deluded liberals than have to deal with the 12 year olds.
jimnyc said:I think she contributes complete garbage, but I think that about almost every liberal that comes here. What makes her equal is that she registered to the USMB under the belief that we encourage and believe in free speech. Believe me, with the headaches I'm getting from this issue it would be so much easier to ban her and be done with it. For once I'm trying to be an innocent outsider looking in, and based on that I don't see her doing anything to warrant a ban.
jimnyc said:What exactly is she taking over? She has no permissions to the SQL database and my password to critical sections are changed weekly. She cannot moderate any forums and has no more rights than the average joe who registers here.
Why do you suggest we get someone in here who knows how to deal with her? Do you think my standing by the rules and encouraging free speech is the wrong way to move the board? Do you honestly believe this board would be better if we banned all those with liberal opinions, those that are rude, those that deal in delusions and not reality? I think this board would be less interesting if we only left those here that we agreed with and got along with.
jimnyc said:I can assure you - if she pushes the envelope and steps over the line (the written rules), I will personally be the one to ban her and link her to DU.
Shattered said:Here we go.. This outta get me dinged a few times...
While Gabby's a disgusting bitch (for lack of a better term), she really hasn't done anything to warrant being banned. Not one single rule (as I've read them) has been broken.
What I see is this:
People are starting to ignore the people they DO like to debate with, and ignore people they like, just to get a piece of her. That's wrong. She really shouldn't be anything more than entertainment value... We shouldn't be stooping to the level of insults we have been over the last week or so (I'm guilty as hell).
From this point forward, I'm going to make a legitimate attempt at following Said's initial post.. Probably not totally ignoring her, but I'm not going to just jump into a thread to leave an insult and nothing more, either.. She's just another user, and really shouldn't be worth all the effort people are putting in to her..
Cheers!
jimnyc said:Honestly, the only thing I find humorous is those that refuse to use the ignore option, refuse to contact me if they have an issue and think the board is going down the tubes because UNLIKE DU, we don't immediately ban users that arent Democrats, we allow those to stay that often have idiotic views and opinion.
I'm at a loss. For 2 years I hear complaints about 'free speech', 'backslapping neo-cons', 'too quick with the trigger', 'favoritism'.... When I try to apply the rules 100% equally across the board to promote the free speech and openness of the members I get chastised for bending over backwards?
Do you guys really want me to allow this to turn into a board that bans users simply because we disagree with them and think they're idiotic?
Shattered said:People are starting to ignore the people they DO like to debate with, and ignore people they like, just to get a piece of her. That's wrong.
musicman said:For whatever it's worth, Jim, I think that whoever is complaining to you about USMB being some kind of back-slapping "amen corner" is full of shit. Look at the people - who could be called, to some degree, liberals - who manage to stay on here. Right off the top of my head, I can name Bullypulpit, acludem, Missle Man, and deaddude - that's a combined five years of membership, easily, right there. And, even members who agree on 80% of things manage somehow to find that 20% sometimes, and disagree - hotly. It's not the content of the posts so much as it is the attitude of the member. I think, for example, that Bullypulpit has gotta be from Mars or something. But, he never fails to conduct himself like a gentleman. I've never seen anything even close to rudeness from WJ. Intelligent, well-mannered people seem to be able to stay on, regardless of their views. I'm convinced that a member who behaves like an acceptable human being will find, by and large, that he or she is welcome here.
USMB is a human enterprise, Jim, and - as such - it will always find that perfection eludes its grasp. But I think y'all have done a pretty damn good job here. Maybe you should ask yourself if the naysayers have the best interests of the USMB at heart.
musicman said:For whatever it's worth, Jim, I think that whoever is complaining to you about USMB being some kind of back-slapping "amen corner" is full of shit. Look at the people - who could be called, to some degree, liberals - who manage to stay on here. Right off the top of my head, I can name Bullypulpit, acludem, Missle Man, and deaddude - that's a combined five years of membership, easily, right there. And, even members who agree on 80% of things manage somehow to find that 20% sometimes, and disagree - hotly. It's not the content of the posts so much as it is the attitude of the member. I think, for example, that Bullypulpit has gotta be from Mars or something. But, he never fails to conduct himself like a gentleman. I've never seen anything even close to rudeness from WJ. Intelligent, well-mannered people seem to be able to stay on, regardless of their views. I'm convinced that a member who behaves like an acceptable human being will find, by and large, that he or she is welcome here.
USMB is a human enterprise, Jim, and - as such - it will always find that perfection eludes its grasp. But I think y'all have done a pretty damn good job here. Maybe you should ask yourself if the naysayers have the best interests of the USMB at heart.