misgivings about the stormy danials trial

Correct. Astoundingly, you said something intelligent. Therefore, you dumbass, you should refrain from pretending that you know. You simply don’t.

Sure I do. You can conclude that based on the circumstantial evidence.

Not really. First part is the lack of credibility of both Stormy and Cohen.
I find them completely credible. Probably because Trump has been caught in 30,000 public lies.

But the other part is even bigger. The fact that the charge is a falsification of business records is so absurd on its face that no fair minded jury would ever buy it.
Why? Because they dare brought them against Orange Jesus?

Trump took pains to hide that he was paying Daniels to keep quiet about having sex with him.

You’re a pontificating gas bag. Only rarely would I put a criminal case client on the stand. Guess what? I got many acquittals all the same. Don’t grasp why? No. You don’t. It’s because well selected juries often strive to comply with the legal instructions and their oaths. They get it that they shouldn’t use the fact that a defendant may not testify against him nor her.
Nobody believes you are a lawyer, buddy.

We're talking about Trump here, a guy who just can't keep his mouth shut. So any sensible jury is going to realizes if he's not getting up there UNDER OATH (and exposing himself to perjury charges) and draw their own conclusions.
 
I recall the start. It was about the time he became president. Suddenly Democrats loved whores who extorted presidents. I hope it is as much fun for you when Biden's daughter gets out her entire story of Joe in a book.
Are you really calling Paula Jones a whore.


Come on bob.
 
Sure I do. You can conclude that based on the circumstantial evidence.

No. You make the conclusion you just said a jury should be the one to reach. And you do it based purely on your preconceived bias. You hack.
I find them completely credible. Probably because Trump has been caught in 30,000 public lies.
No. He hasn’t. You lap up bullshit propaganda. And even if he lacked cred, that wouldn’t engine them with any. You idiot.
Why? Because they dare brought them against Orange Jesus?

Damn. If not weren’t for your trite weak sauce, you’d have no sauce at all, you hack.
Trump took pains to hide that he was paying Daniels to keep quiet about having sex with him.
So you claim. But of course, you have no actual evidence.
Nobody believes you are a lawyer, buddy.
I couldn’t care less what you believe or not, troll bitch. And you can’t speak for others, you imbecile.
 
Not at all.

He is accused in a 34 count indictment of "FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE" with "intent to conceal another crime." That "other crime" is not specified in the indictment, nor has the prosecutors office ever said what it might be.

You're not going to see a girly show at the trial. I don't know that there are other girls besides the Aging Golddigger Stormy, but the prosecutors will have all witnesses costumed in a way that will not offend the jury.

Then again, maybe he won't know to do that. He is a DEI, George Soros product, not some guy who earned his way up.
/——/ Stormy refuses subpoena. Why?
 
Zzz

Repeating your vapid shit doesn’t make it any less vapid, troll.

Pure a waste of electrons.

And you’re off topic again, bitch.

Try to focus. Can a moron troll like you manage to grasp that Stormy recanted ?

See. The actual topic.
Jimmy Kimmel tried to get her to say the note was wrong. She refused to say it is wrong. The note by her stated she never had an affair with Trump.
 
The other crime is bribery.



Yeah, I don't think Trump is going to win any points for attacking Daniel's personal appearance.

I should also point out that when you guys slammed Al Franken for groping a stripper at a USO Show, you guys dressed the Stripper up like a school marm when she made her do the video rounds.

Just remember, the Party of Family Values says it's okay to have sex with a porn star who looks like your daughter while your third wife is home with your fifth child.
Bribery now!

What’s your next invention, killing rhinos for their horns?
 
Bribery now!

What’s your next invention, killing rhinos for their horns?
No, unlike the Trump Boys, I don't murder animals for fun.

1713550513463.png

Third Generation Douchebags
 
You don’t know much about anything.
Actually, I did look, and didn't find ANY reference to this leopard attacking people until the Great White Trump Hunters showed up to kill it.

So why did the Trump boys murder THESE animals? Were they a threat, too.

1713576287284.png


1713576355807.png



 
This trial is about influencing an election, period. It's about weaponizing government to prevent Trump from being fairly elected. MAGA
It's highly ironic that these prosecutors are charging Trump with trying to influence an election when their whole schtick in prosecuting him is done to influence an election.

But hey, they're exempt; they're Ds
 
Actually, I did look, and didn't find ANY reference to this leopard attacking people until the Great White Trump Hunters showed up to kill it.

So why did the Trump boys murder THESE animals? Were they a threat, too.

View attachment 934774

View attachment 934776



oh brother.

no one "murders" an animal

You kill an animal. You murder a human being.

So you're in the party of baby murderers (looks like), and yet you cry over dead animals?

wow
 
oh brother.

no one "murders" an animal

You kill an animal. You murder a human being.

So you're in the party of baby murderers (looks like), and yet you cry over dead animals?

The point was that someone claimed that the Trump Boys were saving a village from a predator, which becomes laughable when you look at all the other animals they murdered for fun.
 
It's highly ironic that these prosecutors are charging Trump with trying to influence an election when their whole schtick in prosecuting him is done to influence an election.

But hey, they're exempt; they're Ds
Still miss the Hunter penis picture, eh.
 

Forum List

Back
Top