Is it possible to protect beautiful women from not-beauties?

Are we happy when the Chinese slip us some shit in wrappers that imitate quality brands?
Do we love surrogates or do we consume it because we are being deceived?
 
Now is the time when a beautiful woman is easier to meet in the supermarket at the checkout than on stage. Many beauties star in porn films. And do you think that this is the real price of their beauty, or is it the result of speculations at the level of society?

The beauty of a woman is incredibly expensive, because it cannot be artificially created. Hence it is in short supply and is as expensive as a rare diamond.
 
As a weak man tries to destroy a stronger competitor with dishonest methods of struggle, such as a crowd of one attack, un-beautiful women destroy competitors who are more beautiful than them. Otherwise, they lose the chance to marry a "quality" man, or they may be left without a man at all

Thus, the feminization of society takes place. Both masculinity and femininity are depreciated, and the trend is towards averaging. As a result, we will come to the situation where a man can be distinguished from a woman only if we look under his underwear.
 
Of course, this is only part of the problem of the general decay of society. Just one of the symptoms of cancer agony of society. The society is oriented towards consumption, it is engaged in pulling the blanket over itself. It is the same as if the diseased organism was fighting with its limbs. The hands would envy the legs that they had more meat in them and would try to suck out all the resources from the digestive tract, parasitizing on the pathways of metabolism.
 
The ass will pretend to be the brain and control organismism in the interests of the ass, redistributing all resources in the interests of the ass, and forcing all other parts of the body to starve, while not realizing that the survival of the ass depends on the whole organism, and the ass alone will not replace the whole organism. even if it becomes the head instead of the brain.
 
This is how the body is affected by the vice. Some part of the brain constantly requires pleasure, and uses the body's resources for this that are not intended for this, for example, exploits lust and depletes the body. This is an internal parasitism. The body acts against its own interests.
 
The right-wing idea of individualism does not contradict the idea of caring for the whole society. The personality of a right-wing society is not just a consumer of goods, it is a responsible actor. The leftist tendency is to subvert power for the sake of the privileges and pleasures of consumption, but at the same time to absolve of responsibility for the consequences, placing it on society.
This is how states that have merged with bankocraty behave. They cover any of their whims and mistakes with a printing press, and the people pay for this through inflation.
 
Last edited:
All this can be reduced to a more general principle. The woman pretends to be a beauty to get the prince, the merchant pretends to be a knight in order to gain power. They all have a desire to enjoy the benefits of their position, but they do not have the ability to perform the functions that their position requires, and all their efforts are reduced only to stay in place and prolong pleasure.
Therefore, they constantly lie and dodge
 
At the same time, the fraudster still uses military forces, but he uses them not in the interests of society, but on the contrary in the interests of suppressing society.

This model has come into the world since the time when the priestly caste subdued the military caste. And this is essentially precisely the "female" model, which provides for the control of force through manipulation, and not directly, and this always requires deception, because the military apparatus will not support the real goals for which it is used. In order to be governed, it must be blind.

In science, this era is called speculative, and it follows the mythological era.
 
Last edited:
A beautiful woman is naive. She was evolutionarily not created for such manipulations, because this type performed maternal functions and obeyed men. When she loses the advantage of appearance, she has nothing to make up for it, so she falls below the cunning woman who knows how to manipulate men.
 
This is the main reason why feminism and the left movement always go together, and feminists made their main efforts precisely on the issue of the destruction of the patriarchal family and the liberalization of relations, up to the complete destruction of the family as an institution.
 
The left-wing family is no longer a family at all, because a traditional family is not just a union for living together, it is an institution of tribal power. The liberal family is not at all obligatory for the functions of cohabitation and upbringing, it can easily be replaced by the state, and this is precisely the main trend. In its modern form, it is simply an atavism of patriarchy, which has a decorative role and may soon disappear.
 
Tell ya what. Grab a megaphone, go to the next large gathering of people, and announce you're going to start a Society of Natural Beauty for women. No plastic faces, no plastic boobs. And you will be the judge.

Let's see how this goes for you, dude.
That crowd would sure dissipate rapidly. Like guys who walk in and the whole bar clears out.
 
A beautiful woman is naive. She was evolutionarily not created for such manipulations, because this type performed maternal functions and obeyed men. When she loses the advantage of appearance, she has nothing to make up for it, so she falls below the cunning woman who knows how to manipulate men.
I'm not so naive that I can't tell you are trying to disguise a long, tedious lecture by breaking it into a million short posts.
 
That crowd would sure dissipate rapidly. Like guys who walk in and the whole bar clears out.
You will call them guys when each of them tries to fight in a fair fight, but until that happens, it's just a crowd of jackals who are licking someone's ass from above
 
Quit talking dirty to me.
Okay, let's talk without expression.

What do you think allows the situation you are talking about? Why are these guys allowed to act like that? Is it because they are strong or because they serve someone?
 
Okay, let's talk without expression.

What do you think allows the situation you are talking about? Why are these guys allowed to act like that? Is it because they are strong or because they serve someone?
To act like what? I didn't bother to read that book-length set of posts. Be succinct or I'll be gone.
 
To act like what? I didn't bother to read that book-length set of posts. Be succinct or I'll be gone.
It has nothing to do with the topic. It's just that you were trying to present the group of guys that people are afraid of as something heroic and serious. "Criminal romance". This is usually not true. Male conversation is only one-to-one or group-to-group conversation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top