Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

The 50s arent coming back....thankfully so thankful for that.
 
The West is destroying the West, the usual route of a civilization in its final century. One of our civilization's central values, Man's separation from and dominion over nature, ends in depleted resources and a severely damage environment. Healing our planet will take at least centuries, maybe millennia. Without fossil fuels and global telecommunication, we can expect several smaller civilizations to succeed ours. Working in harmony with nature will be at least necessary, and may become a central value. Women may have greater roles in that harmony.
 
Working in harmony with nature will be at least necessary, ..... Women may have greater roles in that harmony.
Yeah right. Women ..... the ones with the botox lips, silly-cone tits, plastic fingernails, tattooed eyebrows, platic eye lashes, fake hair extentions, high heel shoes, nose jobs, implanted cheeks & chins, implanted butts, 3-inch thick cosmetics, and monthly hair dye. Yeah, they'll be the ones who will play a big roll in harmony with nature for sure! :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
You can't stop women from working if they want to. Hell, women are now more educated and prepared to work than men. Our economic system just wasn't prepared for this, and we aren't responding very effectively. I reckon it will work out in time.
 
The 50s arent coming back....thankfully so thankful for that.
Nothing wrong with the 50s other than of course the tweaking of the thing's that needed changing. Of course you focus on the bad in a disingenuous way, and it's all in hopes to make it appear as if nothing was good in the 50s.

No one is fooled by you leftist anymore. Well maybe some are, but not the majority thank God.
 
Nothing wrong with the 50s other than of course the tweaking of the thing's that needed changing. Of course you focus on the bad in a disingenuous way, and it's all in hopes to make it appear as if nothing was good in the 50s.

No one is fooled by you leftist anymore. Well maybe some are, but not the majority thank God.
Thete was some good. But it surely wasnt a heyday of times. I can attest to that.
 
Nothing wrong with the 50s other than of course the tweaking of the thing's that needed changing. Of course you focus on the bad in a disingenuous way, and it's all in hopes to make it appear as if nothing was good in the 50s.

No one is fooled by you leftist anymore. Well maybe some are, but not the majority thank God.
I focus on reality you cannot accept. So kerp looking thru your rose colred glasses.
 
You can't stop women from working if they want to. Hell, women are now more educated and prepared to work than men. Our economic system just wasn't prepared for this, and we aren't responding very effectively. I reckon it will work out in time.
Our economic system has been negatively impacted by feminism, IMO. The dilution of the work force with the influx of females has made it so a male cannot support wife and family by himself.

Males are duty bound to support and protect women because they are vulnerable when pregnant. Also men, in America, are legally duty bound to go to battle if needed to preserve the Republic. Women have no legal duties whatsoever. Society has stopped recognizing there is a difference between men and women and women, in particular, seem to denigrate other women for wanting to be home-makers.
 
Our economic system has been negatively impacted by feminism, IMO. The dilution of the work force with the influx of females has made it so a male cannot support wife and family by himself.

Males are duty bound to support and protect women because they are vulnerable when pregnant. Also men, in America, are legally duty bound to go to battle if needed to preserve the Republic. Women have no legal duties whatsoever. Society has stopped recognizing there is a difference between men and women and women, in particular, seem to denigrate other women for wanting to be home-makers.
Economics has decided where we are. Want a blue collar man to support his family it will cost a much bigger wage per factory hour. $20 per hour isnt going to cut it. $25 per hour wont cut it. Now what?
 
15th post
Economics has decided where we are. Want a blue collar man to support his family it will cost a much bigger wage per factory hour. $20 per hour isnt going to cut it. $25 per hour wont cut it. Now what?
Feminism has driven economics. Prove me wrong.
 
Um, men have hormones, too... so that's not an excuse.

Ours just tend to make us needlessly agressive and want to wage dick waving contests.
Speak for yourself. Only the emotional ones do that, and you fit the bill there. Being masculine is about suppressing a large amount of emotional lashing out, because men are more dangerous than women. I think you're just projecting your unstable emotional mindset.
 
The West is destroying the West, the usual route of a civilization in its final century. One of our civilization's central values, Man's separation from and dominion over nature, ends in depleted resources and a severely damage environment. Healing our planet will take at least centuries, maybe millennia. Without fossil fuels and global telecommunication, we can expect several smaller civilizations to succeed ours. Working in harmony with nature will be at least necessary, and may become a central value. Women may have greater roles in that harmony.
Men and women have different skill sets, and overcoming nature is not in the woman's playbook. Women don't build societies, never have. When they try they fail because they generally don't have the wiring. Sure, they'll be a few black sheep, but if you take 1000 women and put them on an island, they won't do very well. But if you put 1000 men on an island, it would turn into largely a military heirarchy that would succeed. The 1000 women would not be able to take orders for other women, but men generally can cede their pride and perform a job for the good of a community even if they're not the one that gets the glory for it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom