Is Donald R Trump LIABLE for Educational Malpractice?

[Contumacious]

EDUCATIONAL MALPRACTICE: WHEN CAN JOHNNY SUE?

I.

Introduction Our public school system often fails miserably in its primary objective - that of educating the students. As a result, a new type of suit has developed, the suit for educational malpractice.' The action is brought by parents of children who were pushed through school and allowed to graduate though deficient in all basic skills.To date, these suits have been unsuccessful in the courts.3 Despite this lack of recognition, proponents of educational malpractice as a new theory of recovery are increasing.' The recent case of Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School District5 is a good example of the educational malpractice suit. In this case school authorities pushed the plaintiff through high school and awarded him a certificate of graduation, despite his numerous failing grades. Although school authorities were cognizant of the plaintiff's learning disabilities, they made no attempt to test or diagnose his problems or to provide remedial help. The plaintiffs suit for educational malpractice was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action."

No parent has successfully sued a public school system because after 12 years Johnny can't read -- why is Trump University different?

 

[Norman]

He certainly isn't personally...

He's been an amazing teacher to the liberal social justice mob and media. The medicine hasn't tasted good, but damn has it been a blast for the rest.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Trump U: ‘Veg-O-Matic university’

‘Veg-O-Matic university’ had ‘one purpose — to fleece the students’

 

[Contumacious]

He certainly isn't personally...

He's been an amazing teacher to the liberal social justice mob and media. The medicine hasn't tasted good, but damn has it been a blast for the rest.

In the lawsuit, former students claim that the University and Trump violated federal law by luring them to sign up with false promises and then defrauded them once they handed over their checks

 

[BluesLegend]

And the millions of worthless liberal arts college degrees? Do you libs really want to open this can of worms? I don't think so, there's over $1 trillion dollars of student loan debt on the books.

 

[Contumacious]

Trump U: ‘Veg-O-Matic university’

‘Veg-O-Matic university’ had ‘one purpose — to fleece the students’

WHY are public schools and state bureaucrats different?

 

[Norman]

He certainly isn't personally...

He's been an amazing teacher to the liberal social justice mob and media. The medicine hasn't tasted good, but damn has it been a blast for the rest.

In the lawsuit, former students claim that the University and Trump violated federal law by luring them to sign up with false promises and then defrauded them once they handed over their checks

At this point it must be asked. Do you know the difference between Trump, the person, and Trump University, the corporation.

Trump is not personally liable for any of it.

 

[Contumacious]

And the millions of worthless liberal arts college degrees? Do you libs really want to open this can of worms? I don't think so, there's over $1 trillion dollars of student loan debt on the books.

The lawsuit against Trump is different. The Attorneys are conflicted by interest


, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, the law firm behind the class action lawsuit, is not exactly neutral either. Our analysis, using data first compiled byThe Washington Post, found that Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd paid the Clintons a total of $675,000 in fees for speeches since 2009. Hillary Clinton gave a $225,000 speech at the law firm as recently as September 4, 2014. Bill Clinton also gave a speech for the same fee back in 2013, and another one in 2009 before the firm had been renamed (they used to be called Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP). In fact, of the five law firms that paid for the Clintons to speak over the last few years, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd paid out the most money.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

WHY are public schools and state bureaucrats different?

One has to fulfill pre requisites to enter Real schools ..not just have a credit card ..get real..deal with it..

'A FRAUD FROM THE BEGINNING TO END'


New York Attorney General Slams Trump U... Clinton Pounces... Workers Pillory School: A 'Lie,' 'Scheme'... Vet: Trump U Fired Me For Being In The Military... Possible Violation Of Federal Law... Trump Defends Scam School With A Video That Is Itself A Scam..

 

[Contumacious]

He certainly isn't personally...

He's been an amazing teacher to the liberal social justice mob and media. The medicine hasn't tasted good, but damn has it been a blast for the rest.

In the lawsuit, former students claim that the University and Trump violated federal law by luring them to sign up with false promises and then defrauded them once they handed over their checks

At this point it must be asked. Do you know the difference between Trump, the person, and Trump University, the corporation.

Trump is not personally liable for any of it.

From the Plaintiff's standpoint the question is irrelevant, see post 8..

 

[Contumacious]

WHY are public schools and state bureaucrats different?

One has to fulfill pre requisites to enter Real schools ..not just have a credit card ..get real..deal with it..

'A FRAUD FROM THE BEGINNING TO END'


New York Attorney General Slams Trump U... Clinton Pounces... Workers Pillory School: A 'Lie,' 'Scheme'... Vet: Trump U Fired Me For Being In The Military... Possible Violation Of Federal Law... Trump Defends Scam School With A Video That Is Itself A Scam..

So if public schools are real and accredited why can't they be sued if Johnny is still stupid after 12 years?

 

[L.K.Eder]

EDUCATIONAL MALPRACTICE: WHEN CAN JOHNNY SUE?

I.

Introduction Our public school system often fails miserably in its primary objective - that of educating the students. As a result, a new type of suit has developed, the suit for educational malpractice.' The action is brought by parents of children who were pushed through school and allowed to graduate though deficient in all basic skills.To date, these suits have been unsuccessful in the courts.3 Despite this lack of recognition, proponents of educational malpractice as a new theory of recovery are increasing.' The recent case of Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School District5 is a good example of the educational malpractice suit. In this case school authorities pushed the plaintiff through high school and awarded him a certificate of graduation, despite his numerous failing grades. Although school authorities were cognizant of the plaintiff's learning disabilities, they made no attempt to test or diagnose his problems or to provide remedial help. The plaintiffs suit for educational malpractice was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action."

No parent has successfully sued a public school system because after 12 years Johnny can't read -- why is Trump University different?

what's different? for starters, the plaintiff in the trump u class action suit was successful in establishing causation.

"Here, Plaintiff’s theory of causation is that people who paid for “Trump
University” Live Events “would not have done so if informed they were getting
neither Trump nor a university.” (Dkt. No. 46 at 12.) Plaintiff has introduced
evidence that the alleged misrepresentations of a “university” and of Donald Trump
participation in the Trump University Live Events were prominently featured in all
Trump University marketing materials; and that a “Playbook,” Powerpoint
presentations, and scripts encouraged if not required Trump University
representatives to continue these representations. (Dkt. No. 39-3, Forge Decl. Exs.
15-18.) The Court finds that this evidence provides a method for Plaintiff to
establish proximate causation on a classwide basis without resort to individualized
inquiries, by relying on a common sense inference that consumers are likely to rely
on prominently marketed features of a product which they purchase..."

 

[whitehall]

Wow, if Trump is guilty of "educational malpractice" Barry Hussein better hope it's covered by the statute of limitations when he and his (former) terrorist partner Bill Ayers spent millions when they administered an endowment fund dedicated to improving the education in Barry's adopted home town of Chicago. How did that work out?

 

[Contumacious]

EDUCATIONAL MALPRACTICE: WHEN CAN JOHNNY SUE?

I.

Introduction Our public school system often fails miserably in its primary objective - that of educating the students. As a result, a new type of suit has developed, the suit for educational malpractice.' The action is brought by parents of children who were pushed through school and allowed to graduate though deficient in all basic skills.To date, these suits have been unsuccessful in the courts.3 Despite this lack of recognition, proponents of educational malpractice as a new theory of recovery are increasing.' The recent case of Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School District5 is a good example of the educational malpractice suit. In this case school authorities pushed the plaintiff through high school and awarded him a certificate of graduation, despite his numerous failing grades. Although school authorities were cognizant of the plaintiff's learning disabilities, they made no attempt to test or diagnose his problems or to provide remedial help. The plaintiffs suit for educational malpractice was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action."

No parent has successfully sued a public school system because after 12 years Johnny can't read -- why is Trump University different?

what's different? for starters, the plaintiff in the trump u class action suit was successful in establishing causation.

"Here, Plaintiff’s theory of causation is that people who paid for “Trump
University” Live Events “would not have done so if informed they were getting
neither Trump nor a university.” (Dkt. No. 46 at 12.) Plaintiff has introduced
evidence that the alleged misrepresentations of a “university” and of Donald Trump
participation in the Trump University Live Events were prominently featured in all
Trump University marketing materials; and that a “Playbook,” Powerpoint
presentations, and scripts encouraged if not required Trump University
representatives to continue these representations. (Dkt. No. 39-3, Forge Decl. Exs.
15-18.) The Court finds that this evidence provides a method for Plaintiff to
establish proximate causation on a classwide basis without resort to individualized
inquiries, by relying on a common sense inference that consumers are likely to rely
on prominently marketed features of a product which they purchase..."

When you take li'l Johnny to be registered at the public school does the superintendent or any school official disclose the fact that if Johnny can not read after 12 years , well, that's just too bad?


.

 

[bendog]

EDUCATIONAL MALPRACTICE: WHEN CAN JOHNNY SUE?

I.

Introduction Our public school system often fails miserably in its primary objective - that of educating the students. As a result, a new type of suit has developed, the suit for educational malpractice.' The action is brought by parents of children who were pushed through school and allowed to graduate though deficient in all basic skills.To date, these suits have been unsuccessful in the courts.3 Despite this lack of recognition, proponents of educational malpractice as a new theory of recovery are increasing.' The recent case of Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School District5 is a good example of the educational malpractice suit. In this case school authorities pushed the plaintiff through high school and awarded him a certificate of graduation, despite his numerous failing grades. Although school authorities were cognizant of the plaintiff's learning disabilities, they made no attempt to test or diagnose his problems or to provide remedial help. The plaintiffs suit for educational malpractice was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action."

No parent has successfully sued a public school system because after 12 years Johnny can't read -- why is Trump University different?

That's an interesting though. My state is pushing hard for private, for profit, schools to compete with failing public schools. Personally, I think we should expand letting college kids work off their loans as teachers. But, could private schools be sued for kids failing to learn? Hmmm.

We do have public schools where the mission is more about people having jobs than educating kids, but teachers will consistently tell you that the most important thing is to have parents who demand their kids work.

 

[L.K.Eder]

would you like it if you paid for a school because of the school's advertising that a famous scientist will be the physics teacher, and then find out after paying that it was not a school at all, and that the famous scientist was not teaching anything?

 

[Contumacious]

Wow, if Trump is guilty of "educational malpractice" Barry Hussein better hope it's covered by the statute of limitations when he and his (former) terrorist partner Bill Ayers spent millions when they administered an endowment fund dedicated to improving the education in Barry's adopted home town of Chicago. How did that work out?

Unfortunately, the "courts" are CORRUPT to their core. They will simply create a double standard. One for Republican party nominees and another for government schools.

 

[Contumacious]

EDUCATIONAL MALPRACTICE: WHEN CAN JOHNNY SUE?

I.

Introduction Our public school system often fails miserably in its primary objective - that of educating the students. As a result, a new type of suit has developed, the suit for educational malpractice.' The action is brought by parents of children who were pushed through school and allowed to graduate though deficient in all basic skills.To date, these suits have been unsuccessful in the courts.3 Despite this lack of recognition, proponents of educational malpractice as a new theory of recovery are increasing.' The recent case of Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School District5 is a good example of the educational malpractice suit. In this case school authorities pushed the plaintiff through high school and awarded him a certificate of graduation, despite his numerous failing grades. Although school authorities were cognizant of the plaintiff's learning disabilities, they made no attempt to test or diagnose his problems or to provide remedial help. The plaintiffs suit for educational malpractice was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action."

No parent has successfully sued a public school system because after 12 years Johnny can't read -- why is Trump University different?

That's an interesting though. My state is pushing hard for private, for profit, schools to compete with failing public schools. Personally, I think we should expand letting college kids work off their loans as teachers. But, could private schools be sued for kids failing to learn? Hmmm.

We do have public schools where the mission is more about people having jobs than educating kids, but teachers will consistently tell you that the most important thing is to have parents who demand their kids work.

In the "Age of Envy" anything private, for profit is seeing as evil giving "judges" the license to create a double standard. The public school bureaucrats intentions are pure as the driven snow. Private entrepreneurs are guilty of fraud.


.

 

[Contumacious]

would you like it if you paid for a school because of the school's advertising that a famous scientist will be the physics teacher, and then find out after paying that it was not a school at all, and that the famous scientist was not teaching anything?

Are you saying that no public school has ever promised that after 12 years Johnny will be able to , at least, read? The three R's

 

[L.K.Eder]

no, i am mocking your desperate attempts to tie this issue to the trump u class action suit.