Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trumpoholics are following commands from Trump and assisting him in trying to derail the debates. He is terrified of debating Biden. Trump's evasions, deflections, misinformation, and lies will we under a bright spotlight for all to see.Biden has already agreed to three debates
It is Trump we worry about showing up
More conspiracy theory, why don't you let Biden talk for himself and stop play ventriloquist?
Biden says he will debate Trump, vows to fact-check
Biden says he will debate Trump, vows to fact-check
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters she didn’t think Biden should debate the president at all.www.weareiowa.com
Will he have the left-checkers from Politfraud coaching him through and earbud?
He signed off on 3 debates, so i think he is obligated to do them.... if Trump signed off on those three debates, then he too is obligated to do them.
Is it a constitutional requirement, to become president, no!
There is nothing to suggest that Biden will refuse to debate trump, so where does this thread come from?
Let us all insist that these debates be conducted according to the traditional rules of debate, with time limits that are strictly enforced, a requirement that each candidate remain behind his lectern at all times, that personal attacks be prohibited, and that the candidates be prohibited from addressing each other directly.
That wont work in real time unless someone interrupts Drumpfs bullshit immediately and fact checks him.There is nothing to suggest that Biden will refuse to debate trump, so where does this thread come from?
Let us all insist that these debates be conducted according to the traditional rules of debate, with time limits that are strictly enforced, a requirement that each candidate remain behind his lectern at all times, that personal attacks be prohibited, and that the candidates be prohibited from addressing each other directly.
I think the Biden team want a level of integrity where Trump will be fact checked and can't run off to fantasy land.. The Trump team want no factchecking and the looses rules possible because the only chance they got of winning is an insult roaring match
That wont work in real time unless someone interrupts Drumpfs bullshit immediately and fact checks him.There is nothing to suggest that Biden will refuse to debate trump, so where does this thread come from?
Let us all insist that these debates be conducted according to the traditional rules of debate, with time limits that are strictly enforced, a requirement that each candidate remain behind his lectern at all times, that personal attacks be prohibited, and that the candidates be prohibited from addressing each other directly.
I think the Biden team want a level of integrity where Trump will be fact checked and can't run off to fantasy land.. The Trump team want no factchecking and the looses rules possible because the only chance they got of winning is an insult roaring match
That wont work in real time unless someone interrupts Drumpfs bullshit immediately and fact checks him.There is nothing to suggest that Biden will refuse to debate trump, so where does this thread come from?
Let us all insist that these debates be conducted according to the traditional rules of debate, with time limits that are strictly enforced, a requirement that each candidate remain behind his lectern at all times, that personal attacks be prohibited, and that the candidates be prohibited from addressing each other directly.
I think the Biden team want a level of integrity where Trump will be fact checked and can't run off to fantasy land.. The Trump team want no factchecking and the looses rules possible because the only chance they got of winning is an insult roaring match
Debates have usually got topics and it is reasonable for well school political moderator to know the facts...
I have seen debates in UK and Ireland and moderators would simply pull the candidate back explain how they are wrong. They get opportunity to say they misspoke or correct themselves, if not the moderator will say how can give a credible opinion when you don't know the facts. So everything the say from then on the subject is dismissed as ranting of a clown. So have your facts straight...
I havent watch a ton of debates but every single one I have watched the participants get away with not answering the question or lying about it. The fact checking afterwards is too late. This is in reference to presidential debates.That wont work in real time unless someone interrupts Drumpfs bullshit immediately and fact checks him.There is nothing to suggest that Biden will refuse to debate trump, so where does this thread come from?
Let us all insist that these debates be conducted according to the traditional rules of debate, with time limits that are strictly enforced, a requirement that each candidate remain behind his lectern at all times, that personal attacks be prohibited, and that the candidates be prohibited from addressing each other directly.
I think the Biden team want a level of integrity where Trump will be fact checked and can't run off to fantasy land.. The Trump team want no factchecking and the looses rules possible because the only chance they got of winning is an insult roaring match
Debates have usually got topics and it is reasonable for well school political moderator to know the facts...
I have seen debates in UK and Ireland and moderators would simply pull the candidate back explain how they are wrong. They get opportunity to say they misspoke or correct themselves, if not the moderator will say how can give a credible opinion when you don't know the facts. So everything the say from then on the subject is dismissed as ranting of a clown. So have your facts straight...
"Would you vote for a candidate who was too much of a pussy to debate? "Would you vote for a candidate who was too much of a pussy to debate?
How could he handle negotiations with russia or china?
You voted for Trump in the Republican Primary, and he did exactly that, didnt sh o w up for a primary debate.Would you vote for a candidate who was too much of a pussy to debate?
How could he handle negotiations with russia or china?
You voted for Trump in the Republican Primary, and he did exactly that, didnt sh o w up for a primary debate.
Who told you someone that wouldnt debate was being a pussy? Maybe the candidate doesnt want to participate in a clown show.
Well, he could at least be interviewed by someone besides CardiB.Why should he debate a liar and a grifter who "debates" by personally attacking his opponent rather than honestly discussing the issues? Nah.
Biden will crash and burn in the polls if he won’t debateOr can he send his VP as substitue? Has ANY person running for potus ever sent in a VP to do it for him? And is it mandatory for him to debate or can he pass the buck as I think his handlers plan to do?