Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
I think the divisions are more along political lines than the war. Anyone disagree? BTW, I don't think it's a GW phenonema, politics has gotten more divisive in general, from the beltway, out. It won't be better if a Dem is in the Oval Office, though the Republicans will not undermine a war effort in the way the Dems have, at least I hope not.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/w...a6066ff004210e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/w...a6066ff004210e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
July 30, 2006
Partisan Divide on Iraq Exceeds Split on Vietnam
By ROBIN TONER and JIM RUTENBERG
WASHINGTON, July 29 No military conflict in modern times has divided Americans on partisan lines more than the war in Iraq, scholars and pollsters say not even Vietnam. And those divisions are likely to intensify in what is expected to be a contentious fall election campaign.
The latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows what one expert describes as a continuing chasm between the way Republicans and Democrats see the war. Three-fourths of the Republicans, for example, said the United States did the right thing in taking military action against Iraq, while just 24 percent of the Democrats did. Independents split down the middle.
The present divisions are quite without precedent, said Ole R. Holsti, a professor of political science at Duke University and the author of Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. ...