Iran Hangs First Batch Of Mossad Collaborators.

[Soupnazi630]

War is only legal in defense of things like Kuwait treaty violations.
Nothing had been done to the US, so it was illegal for the US to be involved at all.

I watched the video, and heard US ambassador Glasspie tell Saddam the US had no position and did not care if invaded Kuwait.

The 9/11 attacks were provoked by many illegal crimes by the US, including the Highway of Death.

Wrong it is legal when OUR government approves it

It was inb fact PERFECTLY legal for us to be involved.

The highway of death was a LEGAL ACT OF war , a war which was started by the iraqis.

The 911 attacks were unprovoked

 

[Soupnazi630]

War is only legal in defense of things like Kuwait treaty violations.
Nothing had been done to the US, so it was illegal for the US to be involved at all.

I watched the video, and heard US ambassador Glasspie tell Saddam the US had no position and did not care if invaded Kuwait.

The 9/11 attacks were provoked by many illegal crimes by the US, including the Highway of Death.

Having no postion is NOT fiving permision moron

You are constently a liar. the high way of death WAS LEGAL

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Kuwait was guilty of treaty violations amounting to acts of war.
They were stealing oil and dumping it below agreed prices, bankrupting Iraq.

So what Iraq did was legal, justified, and with the permission of US ambassador Glasspie.

1) What the US did to attack Iraqi forces was totally illegal.
Especially the illegal use of hyperbaric weapons on the Highway of Death, under a negotiated, white flag, retreat.

2) No-fly-zones are totally illegal and violated Iraqi sovereignty and air space.

3) Your idea of "Oil for Food" is all wrong. The point is that the US at first was criminal in blockading all food to Iraq. But then we finally allowed them to buy food, but at prices set by the US. The US delivered the food, so your claim of somehow "diverting funds" for weapons is totally impossible and makes no sense at all. Iraq had plenty of money for weapons, but were under the illegal US blockade.

All the rest is even less rational.
The WMD inspections were allowed and turned up nothing.
It was not until after years of this nonsense that Iraq finally halted inspections.
And they were never legal in the first place.

You are a proven liar

Kuwait did nothing to provoke the war your claims are lies. There was no permission given by Glasspie

The hiway of death strictly involed conventional weapons The irai retreat was NOT negotiated and there was no white flag

No fly zones are LEGAL

 

[Soupnazi630]

Do you deny the US invaded Mexico illegally twice, invaded Spanish colonies illegally, attacked Germany in WWI illegally, tried to illegally install Chaing Kai Shek as dictator in China, tried to illegally install Syngman Rhee as dictator in Korea, tried to install Diem as dictator in Vietnam, tried to install Batista as dictator in Cuba, tried to install Samosa as dictator in Nicaragua, illegally invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, illegally took over Libya, the Ukraine, Palestine, Syria, Egypt, etc.?

The US never invaded mexico ILLEGALLY

The US never invaded spanish colonies ILLEGALLY

The US never attacked Germany ILLEGALLY

Chaing kai Shek was not installed by Us and was not a ditator like Mao was


Rhee was legal Diem was legal Batista was legal Somaso was legal

everything you say is a lie

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG


There is no record whatsoever of North being sent by anyone anywhere NEAR any iranian representatives before the election

Your claim is a BALD FACED LIE

SDI was not the least bit illegal and had little to do with LEGAL DEFENSIVE weapons in space

SOcialism and communism is evil less efficient and always fails

Wrong.
Oliver North had been sent to Iran many times.
He was convicted of selling arms to Iran illegally.

Putting weapons in space is totally illegal, and is exactly what SDI was for.

Socialism and communism is how we run the Post Office, the military, fire departments, schools, transportation, harbors, museums, stadiums, etc.
They are vastly more efficient since you do not have to pay the extortion of the wealthy elite monopolies.

 

[BackAgain]

That is identical.
The Iranian collaborators and the German spies were both "non uniformed".

No no, dumbass. German spies in America aren’t traitors to their own land. The Iranians, assuming the charges were true, were traitors.

Follow the breadcrumb trail. It’s not that hard unless you’re as dumb as or dumber than the idiot author of the OP.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Oliver North had been sent to Iran many times.
He was convicted of selling arms to Iran illegally.

Putting weapons in space is totally illegal, and is exactly what SDI was for.

Socialism and communism is how we run the Post Office, the military, fire departments, schools, transportation, harbors, museums, stadiums, etc.
They are vastly more efficient since you do not have to pay the extortion of the wealthy elite monopolies.

He was convicted of selling those weapons AFTER the election you dumbass ************

He NEVER went there BEFORE the election

THAT distinction is what makes you a ******* liar

WRONG it is legal to put defensive weapons in space

WRONG asswipe.

Communsim and socialism are not simple government services. But they are always more inefficient because they require force and violence

 

[Rigby5]

You are a proven liar

Kuwait did nothing to provoke the war your claims are lies. There was no permission given by Glasspie

The hiway of death strictly involed conventional weapons The irai retreat was NOT negotiated and there was no white flag

No fly zones are LEGAL

The Highway of Death destroyed over 2000 vehicles, so that is over 10,000 people murdered.
And clearly nothing was gained by murdering these people.

And the deaths obviously were not from conventional weapons.
They were frozen in time from an instantaneous death.
Only thermobaric weapons can do that.

The only way to kill a person so fast they do not even fall down, is with thermobaric weapons.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Highway of Death destroyed over 2000 vehicles, so that is over 10,000 people murdered.
And clearly nothing was gained by murdering these people.

And the deaths obviously were not from conventional weapons.
They were frozen in time from an instantaneous death.
Only thermobaric weapons can do that.


View attachment 1130064

The only way to kill a person so fast they do not even fall down, is with thermobaric weapons.

Vehicles and bodies are two different things and most of the people ran off on foot'

You are fool of shit as conventional bombs do the same thing

No one was murdered

They were enwmy troops in a legal war

 

[Rigby5]

WikiLeaks proved Oliver North went to Iran right before the elections, and got Iran to not release the hostages until after the election, making Carter lose.

 

[Soupnazi630]

WikiLeaks proved Oliver North went to Iran right before the elections, and got Iran to not release the hostages until after the election, making Carter lose.

No it did not


There was no mention of Oliver North going to iran ANYWHERE in wikileaks


You are a total liar

 

[Rigby5]

Vehicles and bodies are two different things and most of the people ran off on foot'

You are fool of shit as conventional bombs do the same thing

No one was murdered

They were enwmy troops in a legal war

Wrong.
Over half the people murdered by our illegal attack, were civilians.
They were not our "enemy" and it was illegal for us to attack them.
Conventional bombs destroy vehicles.
None of the vehicles were damaged except by heat.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Over half the people murdered by our illegal attack, were civilians.
They were not our "enemy" and it was illegal for us to attack them.
Conventional bombs destroy vehicles.
None of the vehicles were damaged except by heat.

Wrong they were ALL enemy combatants and none were murdered

It was legal and yes they were the enemy

Wrong they all showed signs of bomb damage

 

[JohnDB]

Wrong they were ALL enemy combatants and none were murdered

It was legal and yes they were the enemy

Wrong they all showed signs of bomb damage

Don't feed the Muslim Terrorist Trolls.

Just saying....

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Yarddog]

Traitors to Iran you idiot their Country, they were found guilty of working for the enemy in time of War, it isn't rocket Science.

"their country". Then why are you taking it so personal? Its actually their business, not yours unless you are Iranian. I'm sure they had a damn good reason. And one good reason is its good for the rest of the M.E. Iran threatened other countries and supported terrorists who harrass international shipping lanes, as well as promoting war against Israel , and keeping Palestinians poor/depressed. Their ICBM program was real and so was their attempt to arm them nuclear.

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong they were ALL enemy combatants and none were murdered

It was legal and yes they were the enemy

Wrong they all showed signs of bomb damage

How were they "enemy combatants"?
They were legally punishing Kuwait for treaty violations that were bankrupting Iraq.

The US has no involvement, so had no right to then start attacking a retreating convoy that was no threat to anyone.
The basic principle is that violence is only justified in defense.

Bomb damage would have knocked the Iraqi's body down, not frozen it in place standing up.

 

[Rigby5]

That is a lie.
During WWII, there were over 100,000 Jews in the German Wehrmacht who were never harmed.
The problem is the Zionists who had sold Germany secrets to England in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.

 

[Rigby5]

"their country". Then why are you taking it so personal? Its actually their business, not yours unless you are Iranian. I'm sure they had a damn good reason. And one good reason is its good for the rest of the M.E. Iran threatened other countries and supported terrorists who harrass international shipping lanes, as well as promoting war against Israel , and keeping Palestinians poor/depressed. Their ICBM program was real and so was their attempt to arm them nuclear.

Iran was not at all the problem.
The US was the problem for toppling the Iranian democracy in 1953, Operation Ajax.
And the Zionists are the problem for blowing up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel, so that no one could stop his terrorist gangs, Irgun, Stern, and Lehi, from massacring hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin.

It is silly to claim Iran is "keeping the Palestinians poor/depressed", when it is Israel that has stollen 90% of Palestine, and imposed an illegal starvation blockade for decades.

As far as Iran goes, more power to them, since they are the only hope left for the Mideast.

 

[Yarddog]

Iran was not at all the problem.
The US was the problem for toppling the Iranian democracy in 1953, Operation Ajax.
And the Zionists are the problem for blowing up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel, so that no one could stop his terrorist gangs, Irgun, Stern, and Lehi, from massacring hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin.

It is silly to claim Iran is "keeping the Palestinians poor/depressed", when it is Israel that has stollen 90% of Palestine, and imposed an illegal starvation blockade for decades.

As far as Iran goes, more power to them, since they are the only hope left for the Mideast.

Iran keeps the palestinians in a cycle of war.. billions of dollars sent to gaza, and all of it only ending up as weapons and tunnels. Iranians dont want peace with Israel and will use Poor palestinians as a pawn to wear down the Israelis, only it didnt work. Also, there never was a country called Palestine, that was made up by the british.

Whatever happened in 1953, its not the reason Islamists want to destroy the Western civilizations, it's religious ideology. that isnt going to change for the radicals.