Insurance Companies Protest Obama’s Obamacare Fix; What’s At Stake

Jackson

Gold Member
Dec 31, 2010
27,502
7,917
290
Nashville
Insurance Companies Protest Obama’s Obamacare Fix; What’s At Stake


1. The companies’ hostility is important because the president is trying to prevent swing-state Democratic politicians from fleeing his Obamacare project amid rising anger from middle-class, politically influential swing voters.

If they flee, the GOP gets a chance to rollback the Democrats’ power grab by pushing some free-market rules back into the health-care sector.

2. “Changing the rules after health plans have already met the requirements of the law could destabilize the market and result in higher premiums for consumers,” said a skeptical statement from America’s Health Insurance Plans, the trade association for health-insurance companies.

3. “This puts the insurance companies, who have successfully complied with the law, in a hell of a mess,” said Robert Laszewksi, a health-insurance consultant who echoes the views of insurance executives.

The insurance companies’ hostility is calculated, risky and important.


4. There’s nothing in the law that gives the president the authority to make the companies provide pre-Obamacare, low-profit insurance services to healthy people. In fact, the president’s aides admit they don’t have the power to make the executives do what he’s asking them to do.

5. The progressives vs. executives fight is important because if Obama can’t rally the companies around the crippled Obamacare program, there’s a high risk that Democratic politicians will abandon the Obamacare program under pressure from angry voters.

Worse, there’s a growing risk that the 2014 election will give the GOP a majority in the House and Senate. so wrecking Obama’s second-term agenda and allowing the GOP to carefully dismantle Obamacare, which is the president’s primary first-term accomplishment


Read more: Insurance companies protest Obama's Obamacare fix | The Daily Caller
 
Given normal reversion to the mean and the history of mid-term elections Obama couldn't keep the Senate or change the house even without Obamacare. Even if the GOP sweeps all toss ups and leaners it cannot get to veto proof majorities so really no big changes will come from this election.
 
Given normal reversion to the mean and the history of mid-term elections Obama couldn't keep the Senate or change the house even without Obamacare. Even if the GOP sweeps all toss ups and leaners it cannot get to veto proof majorities so really no big changes will come from this election.

That's an interesting take, William, however we could see some Democrats coming to the Republican side on important votes just to keep their seats. Obamacare could be in jeopardy.
 
Last edited:
Given normal reversion to the mean and the history of mid-term elections Obama couldn't keep the Senate or change the house even without Obamacare. Even if the GOP sweeps all toss ups and leaners it cannot get to veto proof majorities so really no big changes will come from this election.

That's an interesting take, William, however we could see some Democrats coming to the Republican side on important votes just to keep their seats. Obamacare could be in jeopardy.
In the senate for senators up for election in 2016, that is possible. The rollout of employer rules just before the election could also cause a lot of Greens to win "safe" Dem seats.
 
The president doesn't have the power to order insurance companies to do anything. He signed a bill into law and now he needs to get the hell out of the way.
 
Given normal reversion to the mean and the history of mid-term elections Obama couldn't keep the Senate or change the house even without Obamacare. Even if the GOP sweeps all toss ups and leaners it cannot get to veto proof majorities so really no big changes will come from this election.

That's an interesting take, William, however we could see some Democrats coming to the Republican side on important votes just to keep their seats. Obamacare could be in jeopardy.

That’s more of a pipe dream tbh. The dems are not going to run to the right on this issue. It is hurting them no doubt but the reality is that most Americans don’t want repeal (they want replacement or single payer with the latter winning the most support), most people are not going to remove their senators for any reason at all (most are quite safe from the decades of redistricting) and those that are in trouble are not going to get out of it by jumping over to the right on Obamacare. This could swing some elections for sure but the end result is not going to be a shift that far that fast.
 

Forum List

Back
Top