Edgetho
Platinum Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 16,441
- 7,720
- 390
This is what passes for 'thought' in the world of libturds.
Think any of our resident libturds will denounce this nonsense? Maybe one or two. Tops. The rest will either defend it or ignore it. Like the monsters under the bed, if you don't look, they're really not there.
Feminist Nutbag: Consensual Sex Between A Man And Woman Is “Always Rape” Because “It Is An Act of Violence” Against Women…
MSNBC, give this woman her own show! Note: PIV stands for “penis in vagina” (yes, I had to Google it).
Folks, depravity is depravity. You can NOT be depraved on one thing alone. It just doesn't work that way.
Report: Marxist North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-Un Killed His Uncle By Throwing Him Into Cage With Pack of Hungry Dogs…
Worth noting the source for this is North Korea’s top ally China.
Via Straits Times:
You starting to understand yet?
Think any of our resident libturds will denounce this nonsense? Maybe one or two. Tops. The rest will either defend it or ignore it. Like the monsters under the bed, if you don't look, they're really not there.
Feminist Nutbag: Consensual Sex Between A Man And Woman Is “Always Rape” Because “It Is An Act of Violence” Against Women…
MSNBC, give this woman her own show! Note: PIV stands for “penis in vagina” (yes, I had to Google it).
PIV is always rape, ok? — Radical Wind
Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.
This is a developed recap from what I’ve been saying in various comments here and there in the last two years or so. as a radfem I’ve always said PIV is rape and I remember being disappointed to discover that so few radical feminists stated it clearly. How can you possibly see it otherwise? Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.
First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such. Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no difference to him experiencing it as sexual. That is, at the very least, men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act. It is an act of violence.
As FCM pointed out some time ago, intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women. The purpose of men enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more than once a month) onto women is because it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and force childbearing against our will, and thereby gain control over our reproductive powers. There is no way to eliminate the pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the mitigating and harm-reduction practices such as contraception and abortion are inherently harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range from pregnancy to abortion, having to take invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth, forced child bearing and rearing and all the complications that go with them which may lead up to severe physical and emotional damage, disability, destitution, illness, or death (See factcheckme.wordpress.com for her work on the reproductive harms of PIV, click on the “intercourse series” page or “PIV” in the search bar). If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: “behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.
Folks, depravity is depravity. You can NOT be depraved on one thing alone. It just doesn't work that way.
Report: Marxist North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-Un Killed His Uncle By Throwing Him Into Cage With Pack of Hungry Dogs…
Worth noting the source for this is North Korea’s top ally China.
Via Straits Times:
THE execution of Jang Song Thaek, the No. 2 man in North Korea, took Beijing by surprise and will adversely affect bilateral relations.
Beijing’s displeasure is expressed through the publication of a detailed account of Jang’s brutal execution in Wen Wei Po, its official mouthpiece, in Hong Kong, on Dec 12.
According to the report, unlike previous executions of political prisoners which were carried out by firing squads with machine guns, Jang was stripped naked and thrown into a cage, along with his five closest aides. Then 120 hounds, starved for three days, were allowed to prey on them until they were completely eaten up. This is called “quan jue”, or execution by dogs.
The report said the entire process lasted for an hour, with Mr Kim Jong Un, the supreme leader in North Korea, supervising it along with 300 senior officials.
The horrifying report vividly depicted the brutality of the young North Korean leader. The fact that it appeared in a Beijing- controlled newspaper showed that China no longer cares about its relations with the Kim regime.
Two days later, the Global Times, associated with the People’s Daily, a Chinese Communist Party organ, followed up with a sternly worded editorial saying that the abrupt political change epitomised the backwardness of the North Korean political system. It warned the Chinese government not to coddle North Korea any longer, saying that the majority of Chinese were extremely disgusted with the Kim regime.
You starting to understand yet?
Last edited: