Inside The liberal Mind

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
This is what passes for 'thought' in the world of libturds.

Think any of our resident libturds will denounce this nonsense? Maybe one or two. Tops. The rest will either defend it or ignore it. Like the monsters under the bed, if you don't look, they're really not there.

Feminist Nutbag: Consensual Sex Between A Man And Woman Is “Always Rape” Because “It Is An Act of Violence” Against Women…



MSNBC, give this woman her own show! Note: PIV stands for “penis in vagina” (yes, I had to Google it).

PIV is always rape, ok? — Radical Wind

Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.

This is a developed recap from what I’ve been saying in various comments here and there in the last two years or so. as a radfem I’ve always said PIV is rape and I remember being disappointed to discover that so few radical feminists stated it clearly. How can you possibly see it otherwise? Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.

First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such. Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no difference to him experiencing it as sexual. That is, at the very least, men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act. It is an act of violence.

As FCM pointed out some time ago, intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women. The purpose of men enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more than once a month) onto women is because it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and force childbearing against our will, and thereby gain control over our reproductive powers. There is no way to eliminate the pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the mitigating and harm-reduction practices such as contraception and abortion are inherently harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range from pregnancy to abortion, having to take invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth, forced child bearing and rearing and all the complications that go with them which may lead up to severe physical and emotional damage, disability, destitution, illness, or death (See factcheckme.wordpress.com for her work on the reproductive harms of PIV, click on the “intercourse series” page or “PIV” in the search bar). If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: “behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.
Folks, depravity is depravity. You can NOT be depraved on one thing alone. It just doesn't work that way.

Report: Marxist North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-Un Killed His Uncle By Throwing Him Into Cage With Pack of Hungry Dogs…



Worth noting the source for this is North Korea’s top ally China.

Via Straits Times:

THE execution of Jang Song Thaek, the No. 2 man in North Korea, took Beijing by surprise and will adversely affect bilateral relations.

Beijing’s displeasure is expressed through the publication of a detailed account of Jang’s brutal execution in Wen Wei Po, its official mouthpiece, in Hong Kong, on Dec 12.

According to the report, unlike previous executions of political prisoners which were carried out by firing squads with machine guns, Jang was stripped naked and thrown into a cage, along with his five closest aides. Then 120 hounds, starved for three days, were allowed to prey on them until they were completely eaten up. This is called “quan jue”, or execution by dogs.

The report said the entire process lasted for an hour, with Mr Kim Jong Un, the supreme leader in North Korea, supervising it along with 300 senior officials.

The horrifying report vividly depicted the brutality of the young North Korean leader. The fact that it appeared in a Beijing- controlled newspaper showed that China no longer cares about its relations with the Kim regime.

Two days later, the Global Times, associated with the People’s Daily, a Chinese Communist Party organ, followed up with a sternly worded editorial saying that the abrupt political change epitomised the backwardness of the North Korean political system. It warned the Chinese government not to coddle North Korea any longer, saying that the majority of Chinese were extremely disgusted with the Kim regime.
You starting to understand yet?
 
Last edited:

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
73,907
Reaction score
10,169
Points
2,030
Yea, liberals dont have sex or reproduce, its all just rape.

Roll with that.
 

Publius1787

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
6,211
Reaction score
668
Points
190
There is an intellectual feminist side that makes theoretical sense. One drawback, it's almost all a Marxist line of thought.
 
OP
Edgetho

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
There is an intellectual feminist side that makes theoretical sense. One drawback, it's almost all a Marxist line of thought.
IOW, dimocrap.

Love how China is distancing itself from the Norks. That's the end for them.

Think the Norks go down peacefully or will they invade the South and go out with a bang?

I'm thinking they're stupid enough to believe they can win a War against the South and make a deal with the UN.

With the current scumbag coward of a dimocrap (redundant, I know) in office, they might have a point.

But I think the South Koreans can kick their asses all by themselves. Be a helluva mess though.
 

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
25,745
Reaction score
3,032
Points
280
Location
Earth
This is what passes for 'thought' in the world of libturds.

Think any of our resident libturds will denounce this nonsense? Maybe one or two. Tops. The rest will either defend it or ignore it. Like the monsters under the bed, if you don't look, they're really not there.

Feminist Nutbag: Consensual Sex Between A Man And Woman Is “Always Rape” Because “It Is An Act of Violence” Against Women…



MSNBC, give this woman her own show! Note: PIV stands for “penis in vagina” (yes, I had to Google it).

PIV is always rape, ok? — Radical Wind

Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.

This is a developed recap from what I’ve been saying in various comments here and there in the last two years or so. as a radfem I’ve always said PIV is rape and I remember being disappointed to discover that so few radical feminists stated it clearly. How can you possibly see it otherwise? Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.

First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such. Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no difference to him experiencing it as sexual. That is, at the very least, men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act. It is an act of violence.

As FCM pointed out some time ago, intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women. The purpose of men enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more than once a month) onto women is because it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and force childbearing against our will, and thereby gain control over our reproductive powers. There is no way to eliminate the pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the mitigating and harm-reduction practices such as contraception and abortion are inherently harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range from pregnancy to abortion, having to take invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth, forced child bearing and rearing and all the complications that go with them which may lead up to severe physical and emotional damage, disability, destitution, illness, or death (See factcheckme.wordpress.com for her work on the reproductive harms of PIV, click on the “intercourse series” page or “PIV” in the search bar). If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: “behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.
Folks, depravity is depravity. You can NOT be depraved on one thing alone. It just doesn't work that way.

Report: Marxist North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-Un Killed His Uncle By Throwing Him Into Cage With Pack of Hungry Dogs…



Worth noting the source for this is North Korea’s top ally China.

Via Straits Times:

THE execution of Jang Song Thaek, the No. 2 man in North Korea, took Beijing by surprise and will adversely affect bilateral relations.

Beijing’s displeasure is expressed through the publication of a detailed account of Jang’s brutal execution in Wen Wei Po, its official mouthpiece, in Hong Kong, on Dec 12.

According to the report, unlike previous executions of political prisoners which were carried out by firing squads with machine guns, Jang was stripped naked and thrown into a cage, along with his five closest aides. Then 120 hounds, starved for three days, were allowed to prey on them until they were completely eaten up. This is called “quan jue”, or execution by dogs.

The report said the entire process lasted for an hour, with Mr Kim Jong Un, the supreme leader in North Korea, supervising it along with 300 senior officials.

The horrifying report vividly depicted the brutality of the young North Korean leader. The fact that it appeared in a Beijing- controlled newspaper showed that China no longer cares about its relations with the Kim regime.

Two days later, the Global Times, associated with the People’s Daily, a Chinese Communist Party organ, followed up with a sternly worded editorial saying that the abrupt political change epitomised the backwardness of the North Korean political system. It warned the Chinese government not to coddle North Korea any longer, saying that the majority of Chinese were extremely disgusted with the Kim regime.
You starting to understand yet?
Oh for the love of G....arfield shut the hell up. Not you OP, the feminazi.
 
OP
Edgetho

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
This is what passes for 'thought' in the world of libturds.

Think any of our resident libturds will denounce this nonsense? Maybe one or two. Tops. The rest will either defend it or ignore it. Like the monsters under the bed, if you don't look, they're really not there.

Feminist Nutbag: Consensual Sex Between A Man And Woman Is “Always Rape” Because “It Is An Act of Violence” Against Women…



MSNBC, give this woman her own show! Note: PIV stands for “penis in vagina” (yes, I had to Google it).

PIV is always rape, ok? — Radical Wind

Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.

This is a developed recap from what I’ve been saying in various comments here and there in the last two years or so. as a radfem I’ve always said PIV is rape and I remember being disappointed to discover that so few radical feminists stated it clearly. How can you possibly see it otherwise? Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.

First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such. Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no difference to him experiencing it as sexual. That is, at the very least, men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act. It is an act of violence.

As FCM pointed out some time ago, intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women. The purpose of men enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more than once a month) onto women is because it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and force childbearing against our will, and thereby gain control over our reproductive powers. There is no way to eliminate the pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the mitigating and harm-reduction practices such as contraception and abortion are inherently harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range from pregnancy to abortion, having to take invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth, forced child bearing and rearing and all the complications that go with them which may lead up to severe physical and emotional damage, disability, destitution, illness, or death (See factcheckme.wordpress.com for her work on the reproductive harms of PIV, click on the “intercourse series” page or “PIV” in the search bar). If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: “behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.
Folks, depravity is depravity. You can NOT be depraved on one thing alone. It just doesn't work that way.

Report: Marxist North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-Un Killed His Uncle By Throwing Him Into Cage With Pack of Hungry Dogs…



Worth noting the source for this is North Korea’s top ally China.

Via Straits Times:

THE execution of Jang Song Thaek, the No. 2 man in North Korea, took Beijing by surprise and will adversely affect bilateral relations.

Beijing’s displeasure is expressed through the publication of a detailed account of Jang’s brutal execution in Wen Wei Po, its official mouthpiece, in Hong Kong, on Dec 12.

According to the report, unlike previous executions of political prisoners which were carried out by firing squads with machine guns, Jang was stripped naked and thrown into a cage, along with his five closest aides. Then 120 hounds, starved for three days, were allowed to prey on them until they were completely eaten up. This is called “quan jue”, or execution by dogs.

The report said the entire process lasted for an hour, with Mr Kim Jong Un, the supreme leader in North Korea, supervising it along with 300 senior officials.

The horrifying report vividly depicted the brutality of the young North Korean leader. The fact that it appeared in a Beijing- controlled newspaper showed that China no longer cares about its relations with the Kim regime.

Two days later, the Global Times, associated with the People’s Daily, a Chinese Communist Party organ, followed up with a sternly worded editorial saying that the abrupt political change epitomised the backwardness of the North Korean political system. It warned the Chinese government not to coddle North Korea any longer, saying that the majority of Chinese were extremely disgusted with the Kim regime.
You starting to understand yet?
Oh for the love of G....arfield shut the hell up. Not you OP, the feminazi.
Not an uncommon sentiment among the leftist dimocrap scum in the Feminist movement. At all.

"In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent."
Catherine MacKinnon in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies, p. 129.."I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."
From Robin Morgan, "Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape" in "Going too Far," 1974. ."When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..."
Sheila Jeffrys ."Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies."
Andrea Dworkin

"Sex is the cross on which women are crucified ... Sex can only be adequately defined as universal rape."
Hodee Edwards, 'Rape defines Sex'

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat."
Hillary Clinton, First Ladies' Conference on Domestic Violence in San Salvador, El Salvador on Nov. 17, 1998

Think about that statement from that life-support system for a ****, Hitlery Clinton.....

Women are the 'primary victims' of War because their men folk get killed.

Just think about that for a minute.

People, you need to understand what you're dealing with. You really do.

"Under patriarchy, no woman is safe to live her life, or to love, or to mother children. Under patriarchy, every woman is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman's daughter is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman,"
Andrea Dworkin, Liberty, p.58..

People, the feminist movement is the heart and soul of the dimocrap party.

And this is only a peek at how they think.
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
59,352
Reaction score
7,232
Points
1,840
Location
Portland, Ore.
Hey Edgy. Just keep up this crap. In fact, convince your Rep that this is the way to go. Elect another Democrat.

Go ahead, denigrate women, blacks, latinos, young people, and any ethnic group not white, old, and fat. That is sure to win elections.
 
OP
Edgetho

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
Hey Edgy. Just keep up this crap. In fact, convince your Rep that this is the way to go. Elect another Democrat.

Go ahead, denigrate women, blacks, latinos, young people, and any ethnic group not white, old, and fat. That is sure to win elections.
So you think all sex is rape, too?

Maybe with you, it has to be..... :dunno:
 

SnowTiger

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
29
Reaction score
9
Points
16
Completely and utterly ridiculous.

Oftentimes it seems like people use the patriarchy as an excuse for why something didn't go their way- like the "thanks Obama" meme.

Now apparently all women are either lesbians or sex slaves.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top