munkle
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2012
- 4,870
- 8,243
- 2,130
So much for "safe and effective." Vaxxed folks: NOW you tell me?
The inventor of mRNA technology and many scientists have called for the full two years of clinical trials originally proposed to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna, lasting through the end of 2022, to be completed before any consideration of approval for general use of their biological agents. This is partly based on disturbing data from a Japanese study, that the spike proteins in the drugs circulate throughout the body, rather than stay anchored at the injection site.
In this Wall Street Journal article, the scientist-authors (one of whom is Yale's Dr. Harvey Risch) say “the large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning,..Four serious adverse events follow this arc…low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death.”
They note a recent Norwegian study found that the mRNA injections “likely” contributed to 10% of the residents who took the shots dying. In a link in the second paragraph, the authors point to a June 1 petition to the FDA by scientists which states that: “All studies we are aware of to date raise concerns about the safety of spike proteins…” The petition calls for the completion of the planned two years of controlled clinical trials, lasting through to the end of 2022, in order to study “concerns” over “reduced fertility, miscarriages, and preterm births.” The scientists say: “There is preliminary and theoretical evidence that the spike protein may promote cancer.”
Wall Street Journal: Pfizer/Moderna COVID Shots Suspected of Heart Inflammation, Thrombosis, Death
[Corona News Editor’s Note: The inventor of mRNA technology and many scientists have called for the full two years of clinical trials originally proposed to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna, las…
coronanews123.wordpress.com
The inventor of mRNA technology and many scientists have called for the full two years of clinical trials originally proposed to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna, lasting through the end of 2022, to be completed before any consideration of approval for general use of their biological agents. This is partly based on disturbing data from a Japanese study, that the spike proteins in the drugs circulate throughout the body, rather than stay anchored at the injection site.
In this Wall Street Journal article, the scientist-authors (one of whom is Yale's Dr. Harvey Risch) say “the large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning,..Four serious adverse events follow this arc…low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death.”
They note a recent Norwegian study found that the mRNA injections “likely” contributed to 10% of the residents who took the shots dying. In a link in the second paragraph, the authors point to a June 1 petition to the FDA by scientists which states that: “All studies we are aware of to date raise concerns about the safety of spike proteins…” The petition calls for the completion of the planned two years of controlled clinical trials, lasting through to the end of 2022, in order to study “concerns” over “reduced fertility, miscarriages, and preterm births.” The scientists say: “There is preliminary and theoretical evidence that the spike protein may promote cancer.”
Four serious adverse events follow this arc, according to data taken directly from Vaers: low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death. Vaers records 321 cases of myocarditis within five days of receiving a vaccination, falling to almost zero by 10 days. Prior research has shown that only a fraction of adverse events are reported, so the true number of cases is almost certainly higher. This tendency of underreporting is consistent with our clinical experience.
Analyses to confirm or dismiss these findings should be performed using large data sets of health-insurance companies and healthcare organizations. The CDC and FDA are surely aware of these data patterns, yet neither agency has acknowledged the trend.
The implication is that the risks of a Covid-19 vaccine may outweigh the benefits for certain low-risk populations, such as children, young adults and people who have recovered from Covid-19. This is especially true in regions with low levels of community spread, since the likelihood of illness depends on exposure risk.
And while you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from Covid-19 vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.
Last edited: