/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do.
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
you should be pissed as hell. yet you blame trump for firing comey. funny shit to say the least.
/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do.
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
/----/ But the Executive Summary is someone's opinion which can be manipulated. Can't you think for yourself?/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do.
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
There's a handy little executive summary, right at the beginning. It's only 15 or so pages long.
Like I said, many members of congress will disagree with you. Also, if you are correct then the house should go ahead and start impeachment proceeding....according to you there is no denying that firing Comey was Obstruction of justice which is an impeachable offense.Obstruction is a moot point unless congress attempts to impeach Trump because of it. Earlier I stated that the IG report supports Trumps firing of Comey.....insulates him against the obstruction charge. You disagree. Okay, fine!
The report doesn't help Trump with the "obstruction" thing, because Trump himself went public and stated why he fired Comey. He can't change his mind retroactively, and say the report justified it.
But again, this thread isn't about "obstruction", it's about the report.
/----/ But the Executive Summary is someone's opinion which can be manipulated. Can't you think for yourself?/----/ OK Pumpkin. As soon as you digest the 500 pages let us know your critical opinion./----/ Neither you nor I have the legal background not the understanding of how things work in DC on the level of understanding the implications. And don't pretend you do.
Thinking for yourself is just too hard?
The report is written in plain English. It's not in a secret code.
And speak for yourself.
View attachment 198558
There's a handy little executive summary, right at the beginning. It's only 15 or so pages long.
An executive summary, or management summary, is a short document or section of a document, produced for business purposes, that summarizes a longer report or proposal or a group of related reports in such a way that readers can rapidly become acquainted with a large body of material without having to read it all.
Probably not going to get her. She destroyed evidence. Scrubbed server...smashed cell phones. She’s a bitch.Dumb...
Yes. This report getting Hillary locked up has been a dumb claim all along.
Link. I don’t recall it said that. I thought it said it cast a “cloud of doubt” over their integrity.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
/----/ I spent 18 years in Legal Publishing and understand what constitutes an executive summary. I've watched the Editors and Authors bicker over punctuation and single words delaying the release of the law book./----/ But the Executive Summary is someone's opinion which can be manipulated. Can't you think for yourself?
There's a handy little executive summary, right at the beginning. It's only 15 or so pages long.
An executive summary, or management summary, is a short document or section of a document, produced for business purposes, that summarizes a longer report or proposal or a group of related reports in such a way that readers can rapidly become acquainted with a large body of material without having to read it all.
Do you not understand what the word "summary" means?
It's not "someone's opinion" - it's a summary of the findings of the report.
Wtf??
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
Not when you are a public employee or spouse of public employee. Most states have same ethics laws.
/----/ Then there is this:
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
/----/ Then there is this:
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
'Viva Le Resistance': Mueller attorney removed over anti-Trump texts...
Link. I don’t recall it said that. I thought it said it cast a “cloud of doubt” over their integrity.
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
/----/ Then there is this:
You haven't been paying attention, have you?
The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
'Viva Le Resistance': Mueller attorney removed over anti-Trump texts...
There gonna have some serious problems there. He was the lead investigator.
