If you're against slavery, you have to be willing to feed and house the slaves that are freed

[themirrorthief]

The truth is slave owners were people of I'll repute and so lazy they didn't want to do one ounce of work themselves. Pathetic they were.

and democrats all

 

[danielpalos]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Only because right-wingers are hypocrites and prefer tax cut economics to raising the minimum wage or social benefits.

 

[bodecea]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

I gave up arguing with the mentally ill progressives. As long as the liberal women are killing their unborn babies in the millions, that is millions of less future Demoncrap voters. Why else are the progressives replacing them with diseased illegals as fast as the babies are murdered...

If you are the only one with a kidney match with someone else who needs one or dies, are you under a legal obligation to give them that kidney?

 

[initforme]

I denounce the democrats and gop. Time for a third party and let the pathetics worship the two main parties.

 

[bodecea]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

There is an old libertarian saying "Actions have consequences". If you are a woman(girl) and you spread your legs, you could get pregnent(this is the hope of the rapists of children on the left), then when the baby is created, those progressives want to kill that child quicker than a whore with a 20 dollar bill.. But hey, if liberals want to kill future Demoncrap voters i am all for it.....

Apparently, it's ok that men can't keep it in their pants. Maybe law ordered vasectomies.........

 

[themirrorthief]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

if you cant feed a baby why are you making one...do you have a brain...and dont give me that old crap about democrats not knowing where babies come from

 

[themirrorthief]

I denounce the democrats and gop. Time for a third party and let the pathetics worship the two main parties.

why not 100 parties, as long as they serve booze and weed, im there!!!!

 

[bodecea]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

if you cant feed a baby why are you making one...do you have a brain...and dont give me that old crap about democrats not knowing where babies come from

Law ordered vasectomies are cheaper.

 

[Anathema]

Thsts part of the reason why I am NOT against slavery.

 

[danielpalos]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

There is an old libertarian saying "Actions have consequences". If you are a woman(girl) and you spread your legs, you could get pregnent(this is the hope of the rapists of children on the left), then when the baby is created, those progressives want to kill that child quicker than a whore with a 20 dollar bill.. But hey, if liberals want to kill future Demoncrap voters i am all for it.....

Apparently, it's ok that men can't keep it in their pants. Maybe law ordered vasectomies.........

It is ok for women to hand us a condom, during straight pride month.

 

[bodecea]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

There is an old libertarian saying "Actions have consequences". If you are a woman(girl) and you spread your legs, you could get pregnent(this is the hope of the rapists of children on the left), then when the baby is created, those progressives want to kill that child quicker than a whore with a 20 dollar bill.. But hey, if liberals want to kill future Demoncrap voters i am all for it.....

Apparently, it's ok that men can't keep it in their pants. Maybe law ordered vasectomies.........

It is ok for women to hand us a condom, during straight pride month.

Law ordered vasectomies are more appropriate....for those who can't keep it in their pants.

 

[initforme]

A big drop in conceptions would be a boon to the nation. Why are people so scared of it?

 

[danielpalos]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

There is an old libertarian saying "Actions have consequences". If you are a woman(girl) and you spread your legs, you could get pregnent(this is the hope of the rapists of children on the left), then when the baby is created, those progressives want to kill that child quicker than a whore with a 20 dollar bill.. But hey, if liberals want to kill future Demoncrap voters i am all for it.....

Apparently, it's ok that men can't keep it in their pants. Maybe law ordered vasectomies.........

It is ok for women to hand us a condom, during straight pride month.

Law ordered vasectomies are more appropriate....for those who can't keep it in their pants.

Only if women are not proud enough, during straight pride month.

 

[Scottish_Brexiteer_UK]

That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Anyone who's pro-abortion I always ask them one simple question (and see them squirm out it)

Would you have been happy for your Mother to think the same way you do?

They even try to say yes - which is a lie.

It's either a lie or they're too stupid to then think one stage ahead and realise that they wouldn't be born themselves.

They'll then try and make justifications like it's a bad world or poverty etc. That doesn't wash. I'd still rather be brought into a bad world, or brought into poverty then when the times right to make my own choices, do something about it - or use it as motivation to give myself a better life.

Too many folk use abortion as a form of contraception whilst in reality there should only be a few cases where it's acceptable - rape, incest, danger to the Mothers life, danger to the babies life or some really bad condition that makes life almost impossible anyway (for both the child and/or the parents).

 

[mamooth]

When I was growing up, there was no "Pill." Abortion was extremely rare, and illegal.

Is that what you were told?

It wasn't true.

But pro-lifers don't care. They're overjoyed to have many abortions happen, so long as it's dangerous and degrading for the woman. They're sick pervs who care only about being control freaks, and not about "life". As long as the "sluts" are properly punished, pro-lifers are happy.

 

[Blackrook]

Slavery and abortion comes from the same place, a belief that a human being is less than human, and the willingness to act on that belief.

 

[mamooth]

Anyone who's pro-abortion I always ask them one simple question (and see them squirm out it)

Would you have been happy for your Mother to think the same way you do?

Why did you think that wasn't a dumb question? Because it is. No wonder people laugh at you when you ask. I would have told you that. If my mom had an abortion, I wouldn't be around to care.

By your idiot argument, every human should be breeding to the maximum extent possible, otherwise they're preventing precious life from happening, which you're saying is the ultimate sin. Are you being consistent and adovacting that, or are you being a hypcorite?

 

[initforme]

So you are in support of less conceptions. You are seeing the light.

 

[initforme]

Alot less women should be breeding. Then abortion goes away. It's not their job to have kids unless they want them. Many younger girls are getting their tubes tied at a young age. They are heroes.

 

[mamooth]

Slavery and abortion comes from the same place, a belief that a human being is less than human, and the willingness to act on that belief.

Slavery and anti-abortion thinking come from the same place, a belief that some are property who don't possess rights.

Fascists, islamic republics and third-world shitholes adopt pro-life policies. Democracies adopt pro-choice policies. That's not a coincidence.