If you're against slavery, you have to be willing to feed and house the slaves that are freed

Blackrook

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2014
21,213
10,864
1,255
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.
 
I think we should let worthless idiots kills their filthy spawn. In fact, parental infanticide should be legal for 2 fucking years.

We need Darwin to take affect. The worthless and fucking stupid need to be weeded out.

:banana:
 

If you're against slavery, you have to be willing to feed and house the slaves that are freed​

There's something truth there.
So you think slavery wasn’t such a bad deal. That’s what they had. Room and board for work.
World champion leap to conclusion! Too bad it's the wrong one.

Now explain how you got there.
It’s actually very simple. Slaves had room and board for labor. Removing the labor and keeping the rest doesn’t work. They have to become self sufficient. It’s not a difficult thing to figure out.
 
The biggest problem with abortions is that they're being performed WAY TOO EARLY!

You should wait until the child is at least a teen before you decide to perform an extremely late-term abortion, in the 55th trimester.
No. The problem is only the child suffers. The ideal would be two parents come to an abortion clinic and a wheel is spun. 1/3 the child dies, 1/3 the mother after birth and 1/3 the father. Just equal up the odds.
 
When I was growing up, there was no "Pill." Abortion was extremely rare, and illegal.

And the bastardy rate was a small fraction of what it is today.

Now, a woman can get a prescription for BC pills for a couple of bucks a month - free if they go to a PP clinic - and we are told that they have no option but to have a baby or kill it.

Bullshit, on steroids. There is no reason in our society for ANYONE to have an unplanned pregnancy, excepting only cases of actual rape. Which is extremely rare.
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?
 
If let's say we had 10 years where we had a solid drop in birthrates because of less conceptions,everyone wins. Abortion goes away, higher paying jobs, there is no downside.
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?

What is a fetus? At what point does a fetus become a child?
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.
If you are the only one with a kidney match with someone else who needs one or dies, are you under a legal obligation to give them that kidney?
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.
I gave up arguing with the mentally ill progressives. As long as the liberal women are killing their unborn babies in the millions, that is millions of less future Demoncrap voters. Why else are the progressives replacing them with diseased illegals as fast as the babies are murdered...
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Well, to be fair, that largely is the conservative position---no welfare and no abortion. If we had a much more friendly welfare system, not just for pregnant women and babies--then I would be more inclined to support going along with increased restrictions aimed at deterring abortions. Maybe even a federal fetus disposal tax.
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.

Do you have a link to support your bullshit or is this yet another case of you tell us what we believe, and being totally full of shit?

No leftist would ever use an expression such as "kill the children", because a fetus is not a child. But it is the kind of brain dead, misogynistic comment we hear from men who seek to shame women who make the choice not to continue a pregnancy.

75% of women who have an abortion cite financial reasons. 80% of women who have abortions live below, or just above the poverty line, and I would remind you fools that the poverty line in the USA for a family of 4, is about the same as the poverty level in Canada for a single person.

You don't want poor people to receive income supports, healthcare, or sick leave, but you want to force poor women to have a baby, without health care, maternity leave, or income supports. How did those orphanages work out for you in the 1950's?
There is an old libertarian saying "Actions have consequences". If you are a woman(girl) and you spread your legs, you could get pregnent(this is the hope of the rapists of children on the left), then when the baby is created, those progressives want to kill that child quicker than a whore with a 20 dollar bill.. But hey, if liberals want to kill future Demoncrap voters i am all for it.....
 
The truth is slave owners were people of I'll repute and so lazy they didn't want to do one ounce of work themselves. Pathetic they were.
 
When I was growing up, there was no "Pill." Abortion was extremely rare, and illegal.

And the bastardy rate was a small fraction of what it is today.

Now, a woman can get a prescription for BC pills for a couple of bucks a month - free if they go to a PP clinic - and we are told that they have no option but to have a baby or kill it.

Bullshit, on steroids. There is no reason in our society for ANYONE to have an unplanned pregnancy, excepting only cases of actual rape. Which is extremely rare.
I think unmarried and promiscuous women should be sterilized-- if only temporarily until they get their life together.

Promiscuous boys too
 
That is the kind of argument you get from pro-aborts when you tell them you oppose abortion.

There's a kind of mindlessness to this argument, and also, a bit of evil.

What they are saying is:

Life is unfair, some people are poor, some women can't afford to have children. Solution: kill the children.
wait until they are teenagers and then kill then...teens are much more annoying and expensive than a precious sweet little newborn...just call them overripe fetuses or something so they will be de humanized nicely
 

Forum List

Back
Top