If You Couldn't Decide Between Bolsheviks And Nazis....

[westwall]

Nope...Communists were Left....Fascism is Right.

Both leftist. The opposite of tyranny is anarchy.

DURRRR

 

[westwall]

....proving your ignorance on a daily basis.

.


As if we needed more evidence.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nope...Communists were Left....Fascism is Right.

I've clarified....proven the truth many times, but this is the value of you posting: you open the door for me to push it into your ugly kisser.


Nazis and Bolsheviks.....and your Democrats.....work for the ideas of Karl Marx.

All three are Leftist, socialist, totalitarian.

As are you.


This documentary shows the relationships between Nazis and Communists.

Livingscoop.com

Livingscoop.com









"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story




a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Nope...Communists were Left....Fascism is Right.

LOL

Stalin's definition of Fascism is hilarious!

So Fascism is allllllllllllll about individual liberty and freedom? Is that your final answer?

 

[PoliticalChic]

LOL

Stalin's definition of Fascism is hilarious!

So Fascism is allllllllllllll about individual liberty and freedom? Is that your final answer?

This is the damage Democrat government schooling has done to so many minds.

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. “How do we know the new developments in special counsel John Durham’s investigation are important?

Answer: Because the New York Times and Washington Post claim they aren’t important.



Big Media’s messengers for the Deep State are nothing if not consistent. For years they sold the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax as the greatest story ever told. And now that the entire story is being unmasked as a figment of Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambition, the same suspects insist there’s nothing to see here.

Move along, they say.



It is awfully late in the game to be surprised that our national press corps puts its political agenda ahead of the national interest, but the refusal to treat the Durham probe with the seriousness it deserves takes the dereliction to a new level. The refusal involves deliberate attempts to mislead the public.

Then again, the motive is obvious. Giving Durham his due would require the media to re-examine its role in perpetuating the dirtiest dirty trick in American political history.

They won’t do that re-examination now for the same reason they wouldn’t do it after Robert Mueller couldn’t find the Trump-Russia collusion the press and Democrats insisted was in plain sight. The truth of how they screwed up would destroy careers and ruin reputations.



Asked the name of his client, Sussmann allegedly said no one, he was there on his own as a private citizen. In fact, Durham alleges, Sussmann was working to help Clinton get the FBI to investigate Trump. As proof, the indictment says Sussmann billed the Clinton campaign for his FBI meetings.”

The lefty press is giving Hillary Clinton a pass for Russiagate

Big Media’s messengers for the Deep State are nothing if not consistent.

nypost.com

And observe those posters, the psychotics, who still deny the facts that we on the Right claimed from the start.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...nearly six years after the Russia lies first burst into the headlines, it still boggles the mind that the scam succeeded for as long as it did. Key among the unanswered questions is how Clinton operatives managed to sell the FBI, the Obama-Biden White House and the Washington media the lie that Russia and Trump were working together to steal the 2016 election.

What we do know is that once that sale was made, all the rules about fairness and due process were jettisoned like so much trash. In the rush to demonize Trump and elect Clinton, trusted institutions abandoned their standards and shattered their public trust.

And to judge from the reaction to Durham’s latest court filings, those same individuals and institutions intend to defend their misconduct with all their power.


... the outlets that bet their business on turning Trump into a traitorous monster couldn’t bear to see him crowing in vindication at their expense. So they are battening down the hatches and sticking to their story."

The lefty press is giving Hillary Clinton a pass for Russiagate

Big Media’s messengers for the Deep State are nothing if not consistent.

nypost.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

"The Friday filings relate to an earlier indictment of Michael Sussmann, a lawyer charged with lying to the FBI. Sussmann allegedly tried to convince the bureau that a private internet executive found reams of evidence that the Trump campaign had established secret connections with a Russian bank.

Asked the name of his client, Sussmann allegedly said no one, he was there on his own as a private citizen. In fact, Durham alleges, Sussmann was working to help Clinton get the FBI to investigate Trump. As proof, the indictment says Sussmann billed the Clinton campaign for his FBI meetings.

The new filings go a giant step further in claiming the tech executive working with Sussmann, Rodney Joffe, used researchers and his own special access to gather “derogatory information” about Trump from computer traffic at Trump Tower and later, the White House.

If Durham can prove these broad new claims, he will have performed a huge public service. Indeed, that was his assignment — to investigate the role of the FBI, CIA and other federal agencies in spying on the presidential nominee of the opposition party. So far, all roads lead to Clinton."

The lefty press is giving Hillary Clinton a pass for Russiagate

Big Media’s messengers for the Deep State are nothing if not consistent.

nypost.com

"....gather information..... ??????????

Spying.

On the President of the United States.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

"....the sneering tone of the Dems’ media handmaidens. In its Tuesday story, the Times was especially dismissive, with a headline on a supposed straight news story declaring that “Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track.”

The article insisted that “The latest alarmist claims about spying on Trump appeared to be flawed” and essentially argued that journalists should feel free to ignore them.

The Washington Post also framed the story as nothing new with a headline that said, “Here’s Why Trump Is Once Again Claiming ‘Spying’ by Democrats.”

In both papers, the obvious intent to undermine the idea that Trump was the victim of government spying should be recognized for what it is: disinformation. "

The lefty press is giving Hillary Clinton a pass for Russiagate

Big Media’s messengers for the Deep State are nothing if not consistent.

nypost.com

 

[imawhosure]

....as to which the current Democrat Party shares closer kinship, evidence of these last two years makes clear which it is.

Nazis.



1. Those who have studied the Democrat Socialist Party have concluded that it is now closer to the National Workers Socialist model than the Soviet Socialist model. This based on their being wedded to many industries as allies rather than taking them over outright, as the Bolsheviks did.


2. The more things change, the more they remain the same. The quibble is what is meant by 'control of industries.' The Nazis controlled industries rather than owned them.
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis …The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."
"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman


3. But it was mainly steel production, locomotives, airplanes, etc. that were the interest of the Nazis.
That was then, 20th century.
In the 21st century, information is more, most, essential, its control and dissemination.
And it is newpapers, social media, cable news that are under the Democrat Socialist Party control


4. The Democrat regime need not outright 'own' the information highway, as long as those who do bend the neck and the knee to the regime. The allies determine what views are sold to the populace, and what is to be censored.
Anne Applebaum, who observes about Soviet-era suppression: “Actual censors were not always needed. Instead, a form of pervasive peer pressure convinced writers, journalists and everyone else to toe the party line; if they did not, they knew they risked being ejected from their jobs and shunned by their friends.”


5. JONATHAN TURLEY: I want to emphasize that a lot of people on the left that have said if it's not prohibited on the First Amendment, it's not a free speech issue. That's not true. The First Amendment is not the exclusive domain of free speech. What they are doing is shutting down free speech. The left has come on to a winning strategy. …. they've discovered that if they use corporations to control speech, it falls outside the First Amendment. But it's not true that what they're doing is not a free speech attack. It is. They're trying to stop people from speaking on these platforms….





Soo......Sieg Heil, Democrat voters.

Look at what you have become.

100% accurate! The Left is using a work-around to get their way.

Not that I believe the poll because I believe it is to high, after they censored the story on Hunter and the "big guy," after the election, they went back and asked people about it. Between 14 and 15% of Biden voters insisted if they would have known about it, they would not have voted for Biden.

Like I stated, I think that is high in count, but even if 6% changed votes, Trump wins in a landslide going away. This means that CENSORSHIP by big tech and standard media, carried the last election for Democrats. That is unacceptable in a free society.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Hillary Clinton Falls On Her Face In Attempt To Debunk Durham Spying Allegations As A Fake Scandal​

...Clinton’s response to the matter, she proclaimed that it’s nothing more than a “fake scandal.”
...outside of the conflicts of interest outlined in the motion filed by Durham, portions of the filing alluded to some alleged spying done by some of Hillary Clinton’s allies during the lead-up and aftermath of the 2016 election.

Specifically, Durham’s filing made mention that ‘Tech Executive-1 and his associates,’ reportedly Rodney Joffe, had been exploiting a ‘sensitive arrangement’ to spy on Trump which likely provided the means to further the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization hoax that led to Sussmann’s September 2021 indictment.


Clinton took to Twitter to both share a Vanity Fair article that proclaims to exonerate Clinton of spying on Trump (it, in fact, doesn’t accomplish what it purports) and claim that these assertions against her are merely a “fake scandal.”

“Trump & Fox are desperately spinning up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones. So it’s a day that ends in Y. The more his misdeeds are exposed, the more they lie. For those interested in reality, here’s a good debunking of their latest nonsense.”

Hillary Clinton Falls On Her Face In Attempt To Debunk Durham Spying Allegations As A Fake Scandal

Now, this is just embarrassing...

www.lifezette.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Michael Sussmann’s Lawyers: It’s OK If He Lied To The FBI​

On Feb. 17, attorneys for Michael Sussmann, the former attorney for the Hillary Clinton campaign, filed a motion to dismiss the criminal case pending against him in the D.C. district court. Special Counsel John Durham charged Sussmann in September 2021, in a one-count indictment, with lying to former FBI General Counsel James Baker in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2).

Specifically, the indictment charged that when Sussmann met with Baker on September 19, 2016, and provided him “white papers” and data files purporting to show the Trump organization had established a secret communications channel with the Russia-connected Alfa Bank, Sussmann falsely claimed he was not acting on behalf of a client. In truth, the indictment alleged, Sussmann was working both for the Clinton campaign and an unnamed “U.S. technology industry executive,” since identified as Rodney Joffe.


... remember that the law on materiality is clear that the falsehood need not actually influence the agency’s decision-making process, but merely needs to be “capable” of doing so."

Michael Sussmann’s Lawyers: It’s OK If He Lied To The FBI

Michael Sussmann’s arguments falter when considered against controlling precedent and the totality of the facts alleged in the indictment.

thefederalist.com

And, more to the point....Sussmann billed Hillary for the time he spent lying to the FBI>

Trump was correct about being spied on by the Democrats, and we on the Right have been correct from day one about what lying scum the Democrats are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Nope...Communists were Left....Fascism is Right.

Both are socialist

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia, Durham finds​

'Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.'​

The indictment against Sussmann, says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia, Durham finds

Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to create fake information to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.

www.foxnews.com

And...
Democrats worked with their age-old partners in the Kremlin to author the dossier, aimed at sinking Trump's campaign.