So, prove it.
Don't show me the heavily edited video the Democrats presented.
I want to see evidence that Trump made a statement that incited a riot.
Declaring the election was stolen is not proof Trump incited a riot.
If it weren’t for Trump, there would have been no riot. Everyone agrees.
"But for" causation is not enough to convict someone of breaking the law.
Otherwise, we'd all be criminals.
Consider this:
I hail a taxi cab and it stops at the curb to pick me up.
I tell the driver where I want him to go and the driver pulls away from the curb and hits a pedestrian.
"But for" me hailing the cab and telling the driver where I want him to go, the pedestrian would not have been hit by the taxi.
Should the pedestrian be allowed to hold me legally liable for his injuries?