Top Democrats Are Agitating For Insurrection And Political Vigilantism
- Thread starter Doc7505
- Start date
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 47,012
- 30,136
- 2,615
See, this is why.
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 47,012
- 30,136
- 2,615
Bored today, huh.
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 47,012
- 30,136
- 2,615
"White Christianity"? How many colors of Christianity are there?
Failzero
Diamond Member
The Japs delved into it somewhat oh and the Sub Saharan Africans too
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 47,012
- 30,136
- 2,615
Why?
Just more leftist slogans. There were no charges against anyone for insurrection™. Cuddle up with Adam Schiff and find some new slogans.
Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,578
- 41,953
- 2,430
- Thread starter
- #113
<~~~~~~~~~~>
While you keep spouting your lies, here's what's going on.
Now we need a hundred more planes shipping them out, maybe more then that. Lets load them up those Super Galaxy C-5, probably could get twice as many on a C-5, don’t give them any luxuries.
Better still use Con-Air....
Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,578
- 41,953
- 2,430
- Thread starter
- #114
LefTard Logic:
Insurrectionists -
Not Insurrectionists-
Every time you psycho loons use the word “insurrection“ you lose credibility. NOBODY decent, sane and paying attention can take you seriously.
g5000
<~~~~~~~~~~>
As compared to the "2020 Summer of Love" and the billions of damage done to Blue Plantation cities...Meanwhile, here's a lady in Minneapolis that was arrested without shooting her..
Nope, He didn't say that...
He said that he urged people to be peaceful but asked the NG to be prepared...
This is the regular RW hyperbole, keep staring things up with lies and half truths...
Waltz said that they have a right to protest...
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 47,012
- 30,136
- 2,615
Protest peacefully. They aren't.
I think you belong on ignore. Bye
Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,578
- 41,953
- 2,430
- Thread starter
- #120
What is the Insurrection Act?
Can Trump really use the military to 'put an end' to Minneapolis ICE protests?
The law hasn't been invoked since the 1992 L.A. riots.
What is the Insurrection Act? Can Trump really use the military to 'put an end' to Minneapolis ICE protests?
The law hasn't been invoked since the 1992 L.A. riots.
President Trump threatened on Thursday to invoke the Insurrection Act for the first time in more than three decades and deploy the U.S. military to Minneapolis to “quickly put an end” to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement that have grown since an ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good last week.
“If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT, which many Presidents have done before me, and quickly put an end to the travesty that is taking place in that once great State,” Trump wrote on social media.
The president has mentioned the rarely used 1807 law before. Last October, he told reporters "we have an Insurrection Act for a reason," adding that “if people were being killed, and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that” — meaning flood Democrat-led cities with federal troops to enforce his administration’s controversial mass deportation raids. Earlier, during Trump’s first term, aides reportedly drafted a proclamation to invoke the act as he fumed over the 2020 racial justice protests.
~Snip~
When can the Insurrection Act be used?
Under the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, the president is prohibited from using the military as a domestic police force.
But the Insurrection Act allows a few exceptions to this rule. According to the text of the law itself, the president can deploy the U.S. armed forces and the National Guard domestically in three specific situations:
- To “suppress” an insurrection against a state “upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened”
- To “suppress” an insurrection and “enforce” federal law when the insurrection — defined here as “unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion” — otherwise makes enforcing those laws “impracticab
- And to “suppress” an insurrection or “domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” in any state if it deprives residents of a constitutional right and the state in question is “unable, fail
,or refuse to protect that right”
The Insurrection Act does not define “insurrection,” “rebellion,” “domestic violence” or other key words, and an 1827 Supreme Court ruling gives the president exclusive authority to decide “whether the exigencies” that warrant invoking the act have been fulfilled.
~Snip~
If Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, “the Supreme Court will no doubt have the last word” again, according to Vladeck. “The question is going to be whether the president can use a contrived crisis as a justification for sending troops into our cities,” Vladeck wrote in October. “In other words, the issue is going to come down to who decides the facts when it comes to domestic use of the military.”
Commentary:
So the question will be, who created the situation to impose the seldom used "Insurrection Act" within America? Is it Tampon Tim Walz and his Commie partner in the crime Mayor Frey?
It's not exactly the Confederate Army, but it's getting pretty close to an entire state defying federal law, and using violence to thwart the enforcement of federal law by federal agents. I'm sorry, but when you're throwing ice, and frozen water bottles, at ICE agents that's violence!
The complicit media will now undertake the construction of a meme: Invocation of the "rarely used" insurrection act is "unprecedented" for what Trump will use it for.
Specifically it was designed to allow the federal government to enforce federal law when the local jurisdictions are actively opposed. And it's important for people to understand that.
Most recently it was used by Bush I to protect private property in the ghetto during the Rodney King riots in 1992. Democrats and media were totally cool with that.
Trump want to use it to protect federal personnel, federal property and to enforce federal law against organized, physical opposition and obstruction.
How much more worthy an application is that?
Yet, like every Quisling and biased news source, Yahoo believes that only Democrats can take bold action.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
US clears flying taxis for limited use as FAA launches nationwide pilot program
- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 0
-
Beyond the Headlines: Why Smart Money Watches SEC Form 4 Insider Trading- Started by BellaJones
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
Prediction: When will AAA note gas is over $4 nationally? ($3.88 Today)- Latest: Deplorable Yankee
-
-
