You might actually see this sort of news.
"Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
APRIL 23, 2020 By David Marcus
In early March, President Donald Trump was lambasted for saying on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that he had a hunch the coronavirus fatality rate, which the World Health Organization pegged then at 3 to 4 percent, was in fact much lower, under 1 percent.
...as many as 2.7 million people statewide have had the coronavirus. That along with the just over 15,000 deaths that have occurred leads to a fatality rate for the virus of .5 percent according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Here is what Trump said on March 4:
“Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number. Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and it’s very mild. They’ll get better very rapidly. They don’t even see a doctor. They don’t even call a doctor.”
He went on to say:
“I think that that number (the WHO number) is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.”
Democrats and media pundits blasted Trump for spreading “misinformation.”
Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.thefederalist.com
On the other hand,....appears that Hillary will win.....
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
Really?
What media do you read?
Here's what has been in my media feed lately...
Coronavirus Infections May Not Be Uncommon, Tests Suggest (Published 2020)
Two preliminary efforts to survey citizens for antibodies to the virus have produced controversial results.www.nytimes.com
Up to 2.7 Million in New York May Have Been Infected, Antibody Study Finds
Preliminary results from New York’s first coronavirus antibody study show nearly 14 percent tested positive, meaning they had the virus at some point and recovered, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Thursday. That equates to 2.7 million infections statewide — more than 10 times the state’s confirmed cases...www.nbcnewyork.com
I guess if you depend on Fox News to tell you what to think, you miss a lot of what's out there.
Don't step in that custard pie, now.
Every death is being attributed to the Wuhan disease, by the Left to convince the simple-minded......you.
“The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not,” the guidelines read.
“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry
As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.
Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”. Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie
"Questions remain about the death of a Hartford infant, despite governor’s claim death was linked to coronavirus
An official cause of death remains outstanding pending toxicology results, and officials said it is possible the child died not from the virus but from an underlying condition, sudden infant death syndrome or positional asphyxiation.
In the absence of that official determination Friday, Lamont and Connecticut State Epidemiologist Matthew Cartter retreated from directly connecting the cause of the infant’s death to the virus.
[Democrat] "...Lamont presented the baby’s death as specifically caused by the virus, even though Chief Medical Examiner James Gill’s official cause of death finding is still outstanding."
Questions remain about the death of a Hartford infant, despite governor’s claim death was linked to coronavirus
Despite Gov. Ned Lamont's announcement this week that a six-week-old infant in Hartford was the youngest fatality of the coronavirus pandemic, medical examiners still have not officially ruled the virus played any role in the child's death.
www.courant.com
The death toll is inflated to weaponize it against the current administration.
hmmm....you seem to have forgotten about your media claim. Nice sidestep.
What's the "Wuhan Virus"?
"What's the "Wuhan Virus"?
Usually it's left to me to prove how stupid you are......now you'd rather do it yourself????
There appears to be no such thing as the Wuhan Viris. There's H1N1...SARS, MERS, COVID19....but when I'm looking up scientific literature...there's no "Wuhan Virus".
www.businessinsider.com
That's a good point.You might actually see this sort of news.
"Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
APRIL 23, 2020 By David Marcus
In early March, President Donald Trump was lambasted for saying on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that he had a hunch the coronavirus fatality rate, which the World Health Organization pegged then at 3 to 4 percent, was in fact much lower, under 1 percent.
...as many as 2.7 million people statewide have had the coronavirus. That along with the just over 15,000 deaths that have occurred leads to a fatality rate for the virus of .5 percent according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Here is what Trump said on March 4:
“Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number. Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and it’s very mild. They’ll get better very rapidly. They don’t even see a doctor. They don’t even call a doctor.”
He went on to say:
“I think that that number (the WHO number) is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.”
Democrats and media pundits blasted Trump for spreading “misinformation.”
Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
On the other hand,....appears that Hillary will win.....
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
What PC actually means, is she wants a biddable citizenry informed by Big Brother, in a nation which rejects the concept of a separation of power and allows only one political party, one ideology, a single religion and outlaws all forms of protests.
Why would one need a moron like you to 'interpret' my posts?.
Plus, you do naught but lie.....
For truth: I am conservative, you Liberal
The difference, here:
The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Get it now, you dunce???
Because it's so easy to read your lines and interpret what you are. The morons, those you so easily call others who offer a rebuttal to you, or like me who assess your limited intelligence must be in your opinion stupid. If the reader of all your pedestrian threads will review and research them, they will find every person who did not kiss your as was labeled by you as stupid, a moron, an idiot or some political pejorative.
A rational adult doesn't call others names when they disagree on an issue. One other person currently who is an adult, and is actually a man-child is donald trump, and he, like you, is so narcissistic he cannot ever believe he can be wrong.
We could learn some lessons in civility from some of those arguments in the British Parliament. You can't have a healthy democracy in a society without political balance....Bill Clinton and his neoliberal friends turned the Democratic party away from the working class to Wall Street and China, in a nutshell,....we can argue back and forth where the blame for that lies going back to the bad trade deals with Japan in the 70's., Reaganomics or whatever.
So we now have a one-party system basically.
View attachment 327406
If you believe that, you should be able to show the same for the Republicans as this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
If you cannot, of course, they your thinking is confused.
That's a good point.You might actually see this sort of news.
"Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
APRIL 23, 2020 By David Marcus
In early March, President Donald Trump was lambasted for saying on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that he had a hunch the coronavirus fatality rate, which the World Health Organization pegged then at 3 to 4 percent, was in fact much lower, under 1 percent.
...as many as 2.7 million people statewide have had the coronavirus. That along with the just over 15,000 deaths that have occurred leads to a fatality rate for the virus of .5 percent according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Here is what Trump said on March 4:
“Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number. Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and it’s very mild. They’ll get better very rapidly. They don’t even see a doctor. They don’t even call a doctor.”
He went on to say:
“I think that that number (the WHO number) is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.”
Democrats and media pundits blasted Trump for spreading “misinformation.”
Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
On the other hand,....appears that Hillary will win.....
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
What PC actually means, is she wants a biddable citizenry informed by Big Brother, in a nation which rejects the concept of a separation of power and allows only one political party, one ideology, a single religion and outlaws all forms of protests.
Why would one need a moron like you to 'interpret' my posts?.
Plus, you do naught but lie.....
For truth: I am conservative, you Liberal
The difference, here:
The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Get it now, you dunce???
Because it's so easy to read your lines and interpret what you are. The morons, those you so easily call others who offer a rebuttal to you, or like me who assess your limited intelligence must be in your opinion stupid. If the reader of all your pedestrian threads will review and research them, they will find every person who did not kiss your as was labeled by you as stupid, a moron, an idiot or some political pejorative.
A rational adult doesn't call others names when they disagree on an issue. One other person currently who is an adult, and is actually a man-child is donald trump, and he, like you, is so narcissistic he cannot ever believe he can be wrong.
We could learn some lessons in civility from some of those arguments in the British Parliament. You can't have a healthy democracy in a society without political balance....Bill Clinton and his neoliberal friends turned the Democratic party away from the working class to Wall Street and China, in a nutshell,....we can argue back and forth where the blame for that lies going back to the bad trade deals with Japan in the 70's., Reaganomics or whatever.
So we now have a one-party system basically.
View attachment 327406
If you believe that, you should be able to show the same for the Republicans as this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
If you cannot, of course, they your thinking is confused.
One again, you're stuck in time tunnel, and not in touch with reality; thus you make stuff up as a pretense that you have some intellectual capacity to spew sane hateful rhetoric and are believable. You are not, only the brainwashed few whose eyes and ears are closed believe you are anything but the charlatan I know you to be.
I can't believe he asked that. Damn.
Still no real answer ?
You might actually Never see this sort of news. Especially if you don't get fresh, weekly talking points from Kellyanne Conway and her Orange God.You might actually see this sort of news.
"Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
APRIL 23, 2020 By David Marcus
In early March, President Donald Trump was lambasted for saying on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that he had a hunch the coronavirus fatality rate, which the World Health Organization pegged then at 3 to 4 percent, was in fact much lower, under 1 percent.
...as many as 2.7 million people statewide have had the coronavirus. That along with the just over 15,000 deaths that have occurred leads to a fatality rate for the virus of .5 percent according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Here is what Trump said on March 4:
“Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number. Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and it’s very mild. They’ll get better very rapidly. They don’t even see a doctor. They don’t even call a doctor.”
He went on to say:
“I think that that number (the WHO number) is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.”
Democrats and media pundits blasted Trump for spreading “misinformation.”
Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
On the other hand,....appears that Hillary will win.....
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
LMFAO! Same old bull shit. HRC lost. Nobody denies that.You might actually see this sort of news.
"Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
APRIL 23, 2020 By David Marcus
In early March, President Donald Trump was lambasted for saying on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show that he had a hunch the coronavirus fatality rate, which the World Health Organization pegged then at 3 to 4 percent, was in fact much lower, under 1 percent.
...as many as 2.7 million people statewide have had the coronavirus. That along with the just over 15,000 deaths that have occurred leads to a fatality rate for the virus of .5 percent according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Here is what Trump said on March 4:
“Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number. Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and it’s very mild. They’ll get better very rapidly. They don’t even see a doctor. They don’t even call a doctor.”
He went on to say:
“I think that that number (the WHO number) is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.”
Democrats and media pundits blasted Trump for spreading “misinformation.”
Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
On the other hand,....appears that Hillary will win.....
October 25, 2016...NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
