Well brother I’ve always appreciated Andrew Jackson for his victories against the British. Now I’m not an expert on Andrew Jackson it’s quite clear I think you know more about Him than I do. I know he was of Scots Irish background of course we know the whole image of him as a young boy standing up to a British soldier who beat him during the American revolution.
as for Andrew Jackson’s controversies associated with the tribesman of America. I’m glad you offer up a sort of counter explanation to what perhaps the far left might say. It’s a breath of fresh air to hear what people like you have to say people who care about Americans like Andrew Jackson. It’s really important that we defend their legacy.
What’s 2aguy doing in this thread criticizing Andrew Jackson is he against the image in the legacy of Andrew Jackson? Is that what Republicans are trying to say that they’re against people like Andrew Jackson. Are Democrats supposed to be the ones today defending the legacy of this great American Andrew Jackson?
My response to the far left to for example people who want to destroy statues of Andrew Jackson or people who criticize him because he owned slaves or what they perceive of his negative treatment of Indians …. why doesn’t the far left tear down statues of the African Mansa Musa who was said to be the richest man ever in all history…. He also owned slaves. So my argument is that these were men of their times , yes they owned slaves they were involved in warfare actions they were involved in violent actions. They should not be insulted though that’s my position I feel that way about Americans like Andrew Jackson…and I feel that way about African an Arab contemporaries of Jacksons time.