If liberals support free speech, why was an army needed...

[Moonglow]

Denounced and degraded..

Thank you so much. I do hope there are many more of you. Because these anarchists are destroying our country

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

The religious right screwed the pooch when they decided to impose their moral belief system onto greater society. I'm a struggling Christian myself and I often implore them (to no avail, of course) to stop opposing gay marriage. I don't give a flying **** if two dudes want to get married at the courthouse. It doesn't affect me nor does it affect them.

"
I don't care if 2 dudes marry either. But just like everything else they "fight" for, they always have to take it to the next level. Give them an inch they take 10 miles. Our children are what matters, can we please allow the parents to instill values without it all being destroyed their first day of school?

Well, I drew the line when they said that anyone who "self identifies" as a woman should be able to use the women's facilities. For that I was branded a homophobe. LOL!

I was working security at a hispanic night club and I noticed crossdressers going into the women's toilet, so I told them that is not permitted, yet the owners told me it was okay..So I had to let them use it...Yet there was never any problems compared to the guys bathroom where they like to fight each other..

 

[Moonglow]

Denounced and degraded..

Thank you so much. I do hope there are many more of you. Because these anarchists are destroying our country

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

The religious right screwed the pooch when they decided to impose their moral belief system onto greater society. I'm a struggling Christian myself and I often implore them (to no avail, of course) to stop opposing gay marriage. I don't give a flying **** if two dudes want to get married at the courthouse. It doesn't affect me nor does it affect them.

When I was growing up in OKC the christians would burn albums and protest against rock concerts, and Monty Python's Life of Brian..In the 1960's it was very structured on christian values and you would be condemned and blacklisted if they thought you were not in the grove...Then the 1970's rolled around and things became a little more loser in society and the old hangups and button down Manhatten style died out only to revive itself in the 1980's...Siloam Springs Arkanass has the most churches per capita in the US...And from that city to where I live it's full of Mormons and Seventh Day Adventist and Church of Christ people that hold on to old biblical ways. The women have to swim in full clothing...My cousin's have no TV's or stereos because evil emanates from those devices and Pokemon posses children because they are demonic characters..

Wow. That's pretty extreme. But at least they're not physically assaulting people. I'll take them over the radical left anytime.

Them folks don't come around here, they know they'll end up as bug food...There maybe a few in Fayetteville, Arkanass. But relatively few...The Muslim's around here know to watch their asses here also, they know the locals are ready to kill them if they start anything..

 

[PixieStix]

Thank you so much. I do hope there are many more of you. Because these anarchists are destroying our country

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

Thank you so much. I do hope there are many more of you. Because these anarchists are destroying our country

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

 

[Moonglow]

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

Again it is about the children. I too believe you should be allowed to be yourself. But not at the expense of our children's future and the values we as parents try to instill. I would not want my daughter to look at me and say, "mommy, I want to be a hooker when I grow up"

This is where the alt right and the libertaria

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

Sometimes a bad living example is more impetuous than a good one, but it depends on the perception of the individual and their concepts of how they want to live their life, and sometimes it only creates more bad character establishment...I hire a lot of undesirables in my line of work, not because I am one of them, but I do believe in redemption and giving people a chance to work and make their life fulfilling..Our govt, both state and federal govts.has made it too hard on many folks that want to redeem their lives..We all stumble and fall, a quality of human is if they want to get back up and walk again or lie on the ground and decay...

 

[PixieStix]

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

Again it is about the children. I too believe you should be allowed to be yourself. But not at the expense of our children's future and the values we as parents try to instill. I would not want my daughter to look at me and say, "mommy, I want to be a hooker when I grow up"

This is where the alt right and the libertaria

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

Sometimes a bad living example is more impetuous than a good one, but it depends on the perception of the individual and their concepts of how they want to live their life, and sometimes it only creates more bad character establishment...I hire a lot of undesirables in my line of work, not because I am one of them, but I do believe in redemption and giving people a chance to work and make their life fulfilling..Our govt, both state and federal govts.has made it too hard on many folks that want to redeem their lives..We all stumble and fall, a quality of human is if they want to get back up and walk again or lie on the ground and decay...

I could not agree more. Everyone has their place in the world. Many many people are lost. We have lost our way by allowing government to tell us how to raise our children.

 

[Mac1958]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Liberals support, expect and demand freedom of expression.

Regressives - illiberal leftist authoritarians - do not.
.

 

[Moonglow]

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

Again it is about the children. I too believe you should be allowed to be yourself. But not at the expense of our children's future and the values we as parents try to instill. I would not want my daughter to look at me and say, "mommy, I want to be a hooker when I grow up"

This is where the alt right and the libertaria

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

Sometimes a bad living example is more impetuous than a good one, but it depends on the perception of the individual and their concepts of how they want to live their life, and sometimes it only creates more bad character establishment...I hire a lot of undesirables in my line of work, not because I am one of them, but I do believe in redemption and giving people a chance to work and make their life fulfilling..Our govt, both state and federal govts.has made it too hard on many folks that want to redeem their lives..We all stumble and fall, a quality of human is if they want to get back up and walk again or lie on the ground and decay...

I could not agree more. Everyone has their place in the world. Many many people are lost. We have lost our way by allowing government to tell us how to raise our children.

I have never played that game, I am way to independent to take heed on the govt's idea of child raising....

 

[K9Buck]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Liberals support, expect and demand freedom of expression.

Regressives - illiberal leftist authoritarians - do not.
.

I think there's a whole lot more of the latter than the former.

 

[K9Buck]

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

Again it is about the children. I too believe you should be allowed to be yourself. But not at the expense of our children's future and the values we as parents try to instill. I would not want my daughter to look at me and say, "mommy, I want to be a hooker when I grow up"

This is where the alt right and the libertaria

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

Sometimes a bad living example is more impetuous than a good one, but it depends on the perception of the individual and their concepts of how they want to live their life, and sometimes it only creates more bad character establishment...I hire a lot of undesirables in my line of work, not because I am one of them, but I do believe in redemption and giving people a chance to work and make their life fulfilling..Our govt, both state and federal govts.has made it too hard on many folks that want to redeem their lives..We all stumble and fall, a quality of human is if they want to get back up and walk again or lie on the ground and decay...

I could not agree more. Everyone has their place in the world. Many many people are lost. We have lost our way by allowing government to tell us how to raise our children.

In what way has government told us how to raise our children?

 

[K9Buck]

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

Again it is about the children. I too believe you should be allowed to be yourself. But not at the expense of our children's future and the values we as parents try to instill. I would not want my daughter to look at me and say, "mommy, I want to be a hooker when I grow up"

This is where the alt right and the libertaria

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

Sometimes a bad living example is more impetuous than a good one, but it depends on the perception of the individual and their concepts of how they want to live their life, and sometimes it only creates more bad character establishment...I hire a lot of undesirables in my line of work, not because I am one of them, but I do believe in redemption and giving people a chance to work and make their life fulfilling..Our govt, both state and federal govts.has made it too hard on many folks that want to redeem their lives..We all stumble and fall, a quality of human is if they want to get back up and walk again or lie on the ground and decay...

I'm liking you more and more. You sound like a reasonable liberal. You could be a little more forthcoming in acknowledging the sins of the left. I'm sorry I disparaged you earlier. I won't do that again.

 

[Mac1958]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Liberals support, expect and demand freedom of expression. Regressives - illiberal leftist authoritarians - do not.

I think there's a whole lot more of the latter than the former.

Well, the Regressives are just a lot louder and nastier and more narcissistic.

There are still traditional, curious, decent, America-loving liberals out there. They're just going about their lives.
.

 

[K9Buck]

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

I agree with most of this. Where we part ways is that you think there are anarchists on the right side. I am not seeing it I think the difference between us and them is very simple. It is a personality flaw on their part. They give themselves permission to punch people, to riot, to start fires, they also like the attention and many rioters get paid. The right likes to stay within the law. I will defend myself. But I will never throw the first punch. I cannot imagine acting like those people. It is a blight on our society

Many libertarians are anarchist, there is one on the forum that I know of..

I honestly never consider libertarians to be enough on the right to technically be right. They are more left because of that

I think being a liberterian sort of means accepting the view that, your right to be you includes my right to be free from you. I think supposedly free people should be able to ingest anything they want. I think they should be able to gamble. I believe they should be able to pay for sex. Why do we waste resources prosecuting people for paying for a blowjob? LOL.

I would not like it very much if my daughter looked at me and said, "mommy, I want to become a hooker when I grow up". As a woman I would be horrified, as a mom, I would be off the charts.

This is where the libertarians lose, and that is the difference between them and the alt right. The alt right wants their people to clean up their lives and get to becoming good citizens, and have families

I believe supposedly free people should be free to be a stripper, a prostitute, the president of the United States or anything else they'd like to be as long as it doesn't hurt an innocent person. I suspect this is where you and I have a disconnect in that, perhaps, you want to legislate your moral belief system onto your fellow citizens.

 

[K9Buck]

Thank you so much. I do hope there are many more of you. Because these anarchists are destroying our country

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

The religious right screwed the pooch when they decided to impose their moral belief system onto greater society. I'm a struggling Christian myself and I often implore them (to no avail, of course) to stop opposing gay marriage. I don't give a flying **** if two dudes want to get married at the courthouse. It doesn't affect me nor does it affect them.

"
I don't care if 2 dudes marry either. But just like everything else they "fight" for, they always have to take it to the next level. Give them an inch they take 10 miles. Our children are what matters, can we please allow the parents to instill values without it all being destroyed their first day of school?

Well, I drew the line when they said that anyone who "self identifies" as a woman should be able to use the women's facilities. For that I was branded a homophobe. LOL!

I was working security at a hispanic night club and I noticed crossdressers going into the women's toilet, so I told them that is not permitted, yet the owners told me it was okay..So I had to let them use it...Yet there was never any problems compared to the guys bathroom where they like to fight each other..

I never had a problem with transgenders using the women's facilities. As far as I can tell, nobody had a problem with it. It's not even something that ever crossed my mind. It wasn't broke. Then, it became an impetus that, any dude who claimed to "self-identify" as a female, was basically given a license to be with women and little girls in public showers, locker rooms and bathrooms and anyone who objected was a hate-filled, bigoted homophobe. And, yes, there have been some cases of men violating the privacy of females in the ladies facilities. Basically, the left gave them a license to impose themselves upon women and little girls. I guess the transgender victimhood card trumps the woman victimhood card.

 

[Cecilie1200]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

What on Earth made you think liberals support free speech? They support THEIR freedom to say and do whatever they want, with no argument, dissent, or consequences.

 

[K9Buck]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Liberals support, expect and demand freedom of expression. Regressives - illiberal leftist authoritarians - do not.

I think there's a whole lot more of the latter than the former.

Well, the Regressives are just a lot louder and nastier and more narcissistic.

There are still traditional, curious, decent, America-loving liberals out there. They're just going about their lives.
.

I'd like to believe you. However, the practice of banning and censoring speech is pretty common at America's higher learning centers across the country. It's not just the "radical" left that is suppressing conservative speech.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, intending to insult them, their values and their beliefs for the sake of publicity.

Actually, he went because people there wanted to hear him speak.

And last time I checked, leftists make a habit of going to places frequented by those who disagree with them, purely for the sake of attacking their values and beliefs for the sake of their agenda. I guess it's okay when you're trying to advance the objective, universally-declared goodness and virtue of the leftist viewpoint, though, hmmm?

 

[Mac1958]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Liberals support, expect and demand freedom of expression. Regressives - illiberal leftist authoritarians - do not.

I think there's a whole lot more of the latter than the former.

Well, the Regressives are just a lot louder and nastier and more narcissistic.

There are still traditional, curious, decent, America-loving liberals out there. They're just going about their lives.
.

I'd like to believe you. However, the practice of banning and censoring speech is pretty common at America's higher learning centers across the country. It's not just the "radical" left that is suppressing conservative speech.

Well, it depends on one's perception of the difference between liberals and Regressives. Where that line is.

Right now, most campuses are controlled by Regressives, both in the classroom and within administrations. They've clearly moved Left over the last couple of generations.

I'm still a little stunned by the announcement of "Free Speech Week" at Berkeley. "Week"? WTF? That's how far Left they've moved.
.

 

[Cecilie1200]

What sucks is there are anarchist on both ends of the spectrum.. I never understood why people want to regressively destroy society..These people are in the position they are today because of the society created by a collective of people who worked to progress the conditions of existence..I doubt they would be happy on their own at the mercy of nature and a system that can't help their existence...

The religious right screwed the pooch when they decided to impose their moral belief system onto greater society. I'm a struggling Christian myself and I often implore them (to no avail, of course) to stop opposing gay marriage. I don't give a flying **** if two dudes want to get married at the courthouse. It doesn't affect me nor does it affect them.

"
I don't care if 2 dudes marry either. But just like everything else they "fight" for, they always have to take it to the next level. Give them an inch they take 10 miles. Our children are what matters, can we please allow the parents to instill values without it all being destroyed their first day of school?

Well, I drew the line when they said that anyone who "self identifies" as a woman should be able to use the women's facilities. For that I was branded a homophobe. LOL!

I was working security at a hispanic night club and I noticed crossdressers going into the women's toilet, so I told them that is not permitted, yet the owners told me it was okay..So I had to let them use it...Yet there was never any problems compared to the guys bathroom where they like to fight each other..

I never had a problem with transgenders using the women's facilities. As far as I can tell, nobody had a problem with it. It's not even something that ever crossed my mind. It wasn't broke. Then, it became an impetus that, any dude who claimed to "self-identify" as a female, was basically given a license to be with women and little girls in public showers, locker rooms and bathrooms and anyone who objected was a hate-filled, bigoted homophobe. And, yes, there have been some cases of men violating the privacy of females in the ladies facilities. Basically, the left gave them a license to impose themselves upon women and little girls. I guess the transgender victimhood card trumps the woman victimhood card.

I've never understood why feminists don't understand how much damage they're doing to their own cause.

 

[Moonglow]

The religious right screwed the pooch when they decided to impose their moral belief system onto greater society. I'm a struggling Christian myself and I often implore them (to no avail, of course) to stop opposing gay marriage. I don't give a flying **** if two dudes want to get married at the courthouse. It doesn't affect me nor does it affect them.

"
I don't care if 2 dudes marry either. But just like everything else they "fight" for, they always have to take it to the next level. Give them an inch they take 10 miles. Our children are what matters, can we please allow the parents to instill values without it all being destroyed their first day of school?

Well, I drew the line when they said that anyone who "self identifies" as a woman should be able to use the women's facilities. For that I was branded a homophobe. LOL!

I was working security at a hispanic night club and I noticed crossdressers going into the women's toilet, so I told them that is not permitted, yet the owners told me it was okay..So I had to let them use it...Yet there was never any problems compared to the guys bathroom where they like to fight each other..

I never had a problem with transgenders using the women's facilities. As far as I can tell, nobody had a problem with it. It's not even something that ever crossed my mind. It wasn't broke. Then, it became an impetus that, any dude who claimed to "self-identify" as a female, was basically given a license to be with women and little girls in public showers, locker rooms and bathrooms and anyone who objected was a hate-filled, bigoted homophobe. And, yes, there have been some cases of men violating the privacy of females in the ladies facilities. Basically, the left gave them a license to impose themselves upon women and little girls. I guess the transgender victimhood card trumps the woman victimhood card.

I've never understood why feminists don't understand how much damage they're doing to their own cause.

It did grow out of hand compared to the feminist movement in the 1970's...

 

[K9Buck]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

What on Earth made you think liberals support free speech? They support THEIR freedom to say and do whatever they want, with no argument, dissent, or consequences.

There certainly seems to be an inordinate number of folks on the left that do NOT support free speech.