- Banned
- #1
Im sure not too many of you ppl out there have heard of this but theres a problem with the Kansas public schools as the legislature is barely making enough budget to fund our schools by increasing taxes on the weirdest things. MY point is the Senate is where the Gambling Bill has failed in the past, needs to think of the state and the schools rather than themselves and what their opinions are. This bill has been reworked a numerous times and after seeing this article IM HAPPY!!!!
The schools are in desperate needs of supplies to help keep teaching the proper classes. The gambling bill that is being in the commitee right now and being reworked should pass because this will allow lost revenue to travel back into the state. I wanna bring something up from a local Kansas Newspaper, (if u want to save time read the bolded print it sums it up): Lawrence Journal World
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/j..._same_side_gambling_issue/?kansas_legislature
Former foes now on same side of gambling issue
By Scott Rothschild
Friday, January 20, 2006
Topeka They say politics makes strange bedfellows.
That is even more true when it comes to the debate in the Legislature over whether to allow state-revenue producing casinos.
Shallenburgers current employer, American Bank in southeast Kansas, his home county of Cherokee, and his local chamber of commerce want casino gambling.
So Shallenburger, an opponent of gambling when he was in the Legislature, is now working with key lawmakers to get a gambling bill passed this legislative session, as is Sebelius.
All we are trying to do from the southeast Kansas point of view is if this happens, lets do it this way. Im wearing a lot of hats here, and it does get kind of awkward, Shallenburger said.
Though hes not a fan of gambling, Shallenburger said nine American Indian casinos have been built in Oklahoma within 10 minutes drive of his home in Baxter Springs.
Clearly along the border, right now, theyre sucking money out of our economy, he said.
Legislators on both sides of the aisle saw nothing unusual about Shallenburgers new stance on the controversial topic.
Its a Kansas issue, not a political or partisan issue, said Rep. Doug Gatewood, D-Columbus.
I think he has an interest in seeing economic development of the state, Sen. Pete Brungardt, R-Salina, and chairman of the committee that is considering gambling legislation.
The committee will probably get a bill late next week and then start hearings the week after that. A vote in the full Senate could come next month. The bill being drafted would authorize casinos in the Kansas City, Kan., and southeast Kansas areas, and add slot machines at pari-mutuel tracks in Kansas City, Kan., Wichita and Pittsburg.
Currently in Kansas, four Indian tribes operate casinos in the northeast portion of the state through compacts in which the state gets no revenue.
Efforts to expand casino gaming in Kansas have been repeatedly rejected by legislators, but some Capitol handicappers are giving casino gambling better odds this year because of a recent study that concluded the state needs to come up with approximately $470 million more for schools.
Shallenburger noted that southeast Kansas has been cited as having great potential for a casino.
Give me your opinions based on this information above^... :cof:
The schools are in desperate needs of supplies to help keep teaching the proper classes. The gambling bill that is being in the commitee right now and being reworked should pass because this will allow lost revenue to travel back into the state. I wanna bring something up from a local Kansas Newspaper, (if u want to save time read the bolded print it sums it up): Lawrence Journal World
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/j..._same_side_gambling_issue/?kansas_legislature
Former foes now on same side of gambling issue
By Scott Rothschild
Friday, January 20, 2006
Topeka They say politics makes strange bedfellows.
That is even more true when it comes to the debate in the Legislature over whether to allow state-revenue producing casinos.
Shallenburgers current employer, American Bank in southeast Kansas, his home county of Cherokee, and his local chamber of commerce want casino gambling.
So Shallenburger, an opponent of gambling when he was in the Legislature, is now working with key lawmakers to get a gambling bill passed this legislative session, as is Sebelius.
All we are trying to do from the southeast Kansas point of view is if this happens, lets do it this way. Im wearing a lot of hats here, and it does get kind of awkward, Shallenburger said.
Though hes not a fan of gambling, Shallenburger said nine American Indian casinos have been built in Oklahoma within 10 minutes drive of his home in Baxter Springs.
Clearly along the border, right now, theyre sucking money out of our economy, he said.
Legislators on both sides of the aisle saw nothing unusual about Shallenburgers new stance on the controversial topic.
Its a Kansas issue, not a political or partisan issue, said Rep. Doug Gatewood, D-Columbus.
I think he has an interest in seeing economic development of the state, Sen. Pete Brungardt, R-Salina, and chairman of the committee that is considering gambling legislation.
The committee will probably get a bill late next week and then start hearings the week after that. A vote in the full Senate could come next month. The bill being drafted would authorize casinos in the Kansas City, Kan., and southeast Kansas areas, and add slot machines at pari-mutuel tracks in Kansas City, Kan., Wichita and Pittsburg.
Currently in Kansas, four Indian tribes operate casinos in the northeast portion of the state through compacts in which the state gets no revenue.
Efforts to expand casino gaming in Kansas have been repeatedly rejected by legislators, but some Capitol handicappers are giving casino gambling better odds this year because of a recent study that concluded the state needs to come up with approximately $470 million more for schools.
Shallenburger noted that southeast Kansas has been cited as having great potential for a casino.
Give me your opinions based on this information above^... :cof: