Zone1 If Jesus Was A Jew

[hobelim]

I think that it's great that you deny your homosexual nature.

You are such a dope.

As I said, that Law is not about sex. In fact a literal interpretation is an affront to my God, profanity to teach that the subjects of Divine Law are carnal in nature. That being said, I am married to a beautiful woman. I have adult children and grand children and I would never criticize nor condemn anyone for their sexuality. Neither would I worship an image of a bigoted false god or an austere counterfeit Jesus who has less morals and ethics than I do. In fact gays who reject your perverse Church teachings are closer to my God, exactly as they are, than you will ever be in this world.

Remember that when you are on your knees before a priest taking his mangod into your mouth. One question. Do you gobble it up right away or do you wait till it gets all soft before you swallow?

That's going to eat at your ego to no end.

lol. Are you so certain about that because that's whats happening to you? Denying your gayness?

When you asked if I ever violated Leviticus 18:22 were you offering homosexual sex? lol

Whats going to eat at your conscience is the fact that you are denying what you know is true; you are an idolator. No amount of derision, slander, or condemnation of gays will change that fact.

Schmuck.

You brazenly defy the Laws of my God with your lies, murders, and pathetic attempts at sorcery. You are dead and in hell. You have your reward already! Your own words and deeds condemn you

 

[ding]

what do you need 'citing' ding (bat) ??

Ask ropey. He's the one who brought it up this time. But I've encountered it with this poster several other times.

 

[ding]

It was properly cited (I gave the source). What I didn't do was tear out a line and hand it to you because the concept is more complicated and demands the intellectual integrity of reading a large amount in context. Wanting a soundbite so you can be absolved of having to learn a topic instead of swallowing a pre-chewed phrase is lazy.

Pasting a link and leaving it to the reader to search for what you are trying to argue isn't properly citing anything.

 

[irosie91]

Ask ropey. He's the one who brought it up this time. But I've encountered it with this poster several other times.

"IT" is a pronoun----You fail to make clear to what "IT" refers?

 

[ding]

You are such a dope.

As I said, that Law is not about sex. In fact a literal interpretation is an affront to my God, profanity to teach that the subjects of Divine Law are carnal in nature. That being said, I am married to a beautiful woman. I have adult children and grand children and I would never criticize nor condemn anyone for their sexuality. Neither would I worship an image of a bigoted false god or an austere counterfeit Jesus who has less morals and ethics than I do. In fact gays who reject your perverse Church teachings are closer to my God, exactly as they are, than you will ever be in this world.

Remember that when you are on your knees before a priest taking his mangod into your mouth. One question. Do you gobble it up right away or do you wait till it gets all soft before you swallow?


lol. Are you so certain about that because that's whats happening to you? Denying your gayness?

When you asked if I ever violated Leviticus 18:22 were you offering homosexual sex? lol

Whats going to eat at your conscience is the fact that you are denying what you know is true; you are an idolator. No amount of derision, slander, or condemnation of gays will change that fact.

Schmuck.

You brazenly defy the Laws of my God with your lies, murders, and pathetic attempts at sorcery. You are dead and in hell. You have your reward already! Your own words and deeds condemn you

Sometimes a dope. But not this time. And I don't believe a word you have ever written.

 

[ding]

"IT" is a pronoun----You fail to make clear to what "IT" refers?

Follow the thread. I'm not going to waste time doing for you what you could do for yourself.

 

[irosie91]

Follow the thread. I'm not going to waste time doing for you what you could do for yourself.

I tried----I even LOOKED BACK on the thread -----and still cannot work it out

 

[rosends]

Pasting a link and leaving it to the reader to search for what you are trying to argue isn't properly citing anything.

actually, it IS properly citing something. You don't want my sources cited, you want the operative phrase lifted from context and placed in front of you so you don't have to think or study.

 

[ding]

I tried----I even LOOKED BACK on the thread -----and still cannot work it out

No, you didn't. If you had you would have seen the dialog between ropey and rosends. Maybe try again?

 

[ding]

actually, it IS properly citing something. You don't want my sources cited, you want the operative phrase lifted from context and placed in front of you so you don't have to think or study.

No. It's not. Paste the quote and the link. You just paste links. It's not that complicated or hard to do.

 

[irosie91]

No, you didn't. If you had you would have seen the dialog between ropey and rosends. Maybe try again?

I read the dialogue----it was meaningless

 

[rosends]

No. It's not. Paste the quote and the link. You just paste links. It's not that complicated or hard to do.

You asked for citation. Maybe you aren't aware of what that is. Here's a simple definition: "a quotation from or reference to a book, paper, or author, "

I made a reference to an webpage and provided the link. That's called a citation.

The claim was made (unsourced and unfounded) so I presented a webpage which directly counters the claim. Of course, it requires that people read, but I guess the struggle is real for some.

 

[irosie91]

You asked for citation. Maybe you aren't aware of what that is. Here's a simple definition: "a quotation from or reference to a book, paper, or author, "

I made a reference to an webpage and provided the link. That's called a citation.

The claim was made (unsourced and unfounded) so I presented a webpage which directly counters the claim. Of course, it requires that people read, but I guess the struggle is real for some.

rosends-----try to cope----the REAL SOURCE that muslims accept as a REAL SOURCE-----is the Koran. Muslim "PROVE" by citing the koran. Similarly,
christians "PROVE" by citing the New Testament. Neither of them would accept a citation of the Mishnah or the scholarly writings of jews as "sources" anymore than you would consider a Superman Comic to be a credible source

 

[ding]

You asked for citation. Maybe you aren't aware of what that is. Here's a simple definition: "a quotation from or reference to a book, paper, or author, "

I made a reference to an webpage and provided the link. That's called a citation.

The claim was made (unsourced and unfounded) so I presented a webpage which directly counters the claim. Of course, it requires that people read, but I guess the struggle is real for some.

This is an example of a citation.

It's the Ocean not the Atmosphere, dummy!

The role of the ocean in storing, distributing and establishing climate is well known and well understood. Change the currents and you change the climate. Some regions are more sensitive to change than others and have more of a global impact than others. The Arctic is that region. The Little Ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[rosends]

This is an example of a citation.

It's the Ocean not the Atmosphere, dummy!

The role of the ocean in storing, distributing and establishing climate is well known and well understood. Change the currents and you change the climate. Some regions are more sensitive to change than others and have more of a global impact than others. The Arctic is that region. The Little Ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

that's just a link. I posted a link in post 1432.

 

[ding]

that's just a link. I posted a link in post 1432.

So maybe copy and paste the relevant verbiage from the link? Or not. I don't really care.

 

[hobelim]

Sometimes a dope. But not this time. And I don't believe a word you have ever written.

Such is the power of my God in action either granting, or in your case, denying comprehension.

Life itself.

As if your own church doesn't teach that defying the first command, what you do at mass, isn't a sin under penalty of death, a curse that you so perfectly display for all who have eyes to see. duh

 

[rosends]

So maybe copy and paste the relevant verbiage from the link? Or not. I don't really care.

A complicated issue is rarely cleared up by snipping the "relevant verbiage." Complex questions deserve comprehensive discussion.

 

[ding]

Such is the power of my God in action either granting, or in your case, denying comprehension.

Life itself.

As if your own church doesn't teach that defying the first command, what you do at mass, isn't a sin under penalty of death, a curse that you so perfectly display for all who have eyes to see. duh

What supernatural acts has YOUR God performed?

 

[ding]

A complicated issue is rarely cleared up by snipping the "relevant verbiage." Complex questions deserve comprehensive discussion.

But it makes it easier to know what your argument is.