Zone1 If Jesus Was A Jew

[Carl in Michigan]

Of course not.

Christianity is Judaism for gentiles.

The entire church was Jewish

 

[Ropey]

The entire church was Jewish

I'll give you a break, since you're a proud Canadian.

There is no such thing as an entire church being anything.

Which is why there are "Jews for Jesus."

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I'll give you a break, since you're a proud Canadian.

There is no such thing as an entire church being anything.

Which is why there are "Jews for Jesus."

I'm Canadian?

 

[Ropey]

I'm Canadian?

Well, Michiganian.

It's not that far of an extension.

And if the extension fits, then you must wear it.

Don't be a quitter, now.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I'll give you a break, since you're a proud Canadian.

There is no such thing as an entire church being anything.

Which is why there are "Jews for Jesus."

The Church was founded by JEWS.
What you call "the church" today is the gentile counterfeit

 

[ding]

It may seem that way to you but I assure you it only seems that way...to you.

Anyone with eyes that see, ears that hear, and a mind that comprehends can see that you died and descended into the netherworld, the realm of the dead, in the very day you first set aside the Law of my God to worship a lifeless matzo made by human hands that you eat for spiritual life, derp, and are oblivious to the fact that you have been thrown into hell by the power of my God...

What has your almighty yet edible triune mangod done for you after decades of eating jack shit?

Name one supernatural act of God. You can't. Because you are playing a game. I'm paying you back in your own coin.

 

[ding]

I always do exactly as my God commands.

I think that it's great that you deny your homosexual nature. That's going to eat at your ego to no end.

 

[Ropey]

The Church was founded by JEWS.

I'm not saying that we don't have both sides. I am saying that I love double negatives.

What you call "the church" today is the gentile counterfeit

I don't call the church anything because I don't believe in a one-size-fits-all all philosophy. The Torah makes it clear. It's on me to choose what I say and do.

Yechezkel (Ezekiel) - 22:30​

And I sought of them a man who puts up a wall and stands in the breach before Me, for the sake of the land that it not be destroyed, but I did not find.

ALl of our choices are personal.

 

[rosends]

You are indeed guessing.

Go back to revelation. You need more.

And you are not reading.

 

[Ropey]

And you are not reading.

You admit you are guessing.

There's not much to read with those who guess and are not able to evidentially support their postulated conclusions, and so far... you fit that category.

 

[rosends]

You admit you are guessing.

There's not much to read with those who guess and are not able to evidentially support their postulated conclusions, and so far... you fit that category.

I guessed you didn't read. You confirmed it to be true. Try again.

 

[Ropey]

You're still guessing. You have shown nothing but a link to the Chabad Society page... and Chabad does not codify anything. So far, you have done nothing but discount without any evidence other than your 'guesses'.

Still,

This is why I don't hold the 'church' to the failings of humanity.

I don't hold Moishe, or the Pharisees, for the failings of humanity either.

 

[rosends]

You're still guessing. You have shown nothing but a link to the Chabad Society page... and Chabad does not codify anything. So far, you have done nothing but discount without any evidence other than your 'guesses'.

Still,

This is why I don't hold the 'church' to the failings of humanity.

View attachment 1059681

I don't hold Moishe, or the Pharisees, for the failings of humanity either.

If you had actually gone to the website I linked to you would have seen explanation and sources. You didn't go, and it shows in how you mischaracterize it

 

[Ropey]

IF you had actually gone to the website I linked to you would have seen explanation and sources. You didn't go, and it shows in how you mischaracterize it

I did and have been there many times.

I shall take your conjecture and pass it back to you.

IF you had been able to show a codification, then we would have moved past your guessing.

 

[rosends]

I did and have been there many times.

I shall take your conjecture and pass it back to you.

IF you had been able to show a codification, then we would have moved past your guessing.

But I did show it. Do you need me to cut and paste it here? I can if you think it is too hard to read it on a Linked page. Just let me know if you need the help.

 

[ding]

But I did show it. Do you need me to cut and paste it here? I can if you think it is too hard to read it on a Linked page. Just let me know if you need the help.

Posting a link without citing the specific quote is not showing it. Citing the specific quote and providing a link would be showing it.

 

[rosends]

Posting a link without citing the specific quote is not showing it. Citing the specific quote and providing a link would be showing it.

So you also want things apoonfed. Got it.

 

[ding]

So you also want things apoonfed. Got it.

No. Just properly cited. The way you are doing it is lazy and dishonest.

 

[irosie91]

No. Just properly cited. The way you are doing it is lazy and dishonest.

what do you need 'citing' ding (bat) ??

 

[rosends]

No. Just properly cited. The way you are doing it is lazy and dishonest.

It was properly cited (I gave the source). What I didn't do was tear out a line and hand it to you because the concept is more complicated and demands the intellectual integrity of reading a large amount in context. Wanting a soundbite so you can be absolved of having to learn a topic instead of swallowing a pre-chewed phrase is lazy.