Zone1 If Jesus Was A Jew

[hobelim]

Do the rabbis know that? Oh my.

Well, at the time a few did and they found it hard to believe that a person like Jesus, a froward glutton and a drunk they knew was a sinner (according to the same ignorant literal interpretation of the words and subjects of the Law that you perpetuate) would have received this revelation from God. Then what was revealed to Jesus was lost to time (until now) after Rome assimilated and perverted Christianity using "the power of death" consequent to setting aside Divine Law to conquer "the nations"; by defying the 1st command, worshipping a trinity, and desecrating the teachings of Jesus, claiming it can be made by human hands then handed out and eaten like a cheap snack food which puts 'believers' under a curse, a death from which many never recover.

The death that you so perfectly display with your obstinate stupidity and inability to stop sinning.
Easy prey, a sucker to fleece for every sort of foul and loathsome beast and bird in the wilderness


Damn clever them fourth century Romans, but you.... dumb all over, and a little ugly on the side.

 

[dudmuck]

you are extremely confused-----the Jesus the ESSENE theory has been debunked----your FOUR SECTS theory is risible. A sorta reasonable assertion is -----Pharisee was a sect and Sadducee was a sect----sorta. Essene was a
monastic group of which there were MANY-----and just about all could. logically, be consisdered Pharisee

John the baptist certainly was close the Essene, as described here.

 

[ding]

Well, at the time a few did and they found it hard to believe that a person like Jesus, a froward glutton and a drunk they knew was a sinner (according to the same ignorant literal interpretation of the words and subjects of the Law that you perpetuate) would have received this revelation from God. Then what was revealed to Jesus was lost to time (until now) after Rome assimilated and perverted Christianity using "the power of death" consequent to setting aside Divine Law to conquer "the nations"; by defying the 1st command, worshipping a trinity, and desecrating the teachings of Jesus, claiming it can be made by human hands then handed out and eaten like a cheap snack food which puts 'believers' under a curse, a death from which many never recover.

The death that you so perfectly display with your obstinate stupidity and inability to stop sinning.
Easy prey, a sucker to fleece for every sort of foul and loathsome beast and bird in the wilderness


Damn clever them fourth century Romans, but you.... dumb all over, and a little ugly on the side.

According to you there are no consequences because God has no power to do jack shit.

 

[ding]

Well, at the time a few did and they found it hard to believe that a person like Jesus

What about before Jesus?

 

[ding]

Well, at the time a few did and they found it hard to believe that a person like Jesus, a froward glutton and a drunk they knew was a sinner (according to the same ignorant literal interpretation of the words and subjects of the Law that you perpetuate) would have received this revelation from God. Then what was revealed to Jesus was lost to time (until now) after Rome assimilated and perverted Christianity using "the power of death" consequent to setting aside Divine Law to conquer "the nations"; by defying the 1st command, worshipping a trinity, and desecrating the teachings of Jesus, claiming it can be made by human hands then handed out and eaten like a cheap snack food which puts 'believers' under a curse, a death from which many never recover.

The death that you so perfectly display with your obstinate stupidity and inability to stop sinning.
Easy prey, a sucker to fleece for every sort of foul and loathsome beast and bird in the wilderness


Damn clever them fourth century Romans, but you.... dumb all over, and a little ugly on the side.

Have you ever violated Leviticus 18:22?

 

[rosends]

Predates.

But was not codified until long after. So the practice was not viable under law until there was a law.

Jesus was not a Jew. This is why he was allowed to create a different belief system.

It's a choice. G-d will not choose for us.

It was codified before. There was a law before. Want to try something else?

 

[Ropey]

Not so. I understand why you show no proof.

So...

Where is the previous codification? Who codified?

 

[rosends]

Not so. I understand why you show no proof.

So...

Where is the previous codification? Who codified?

The Torah codified it.

 

[Ropey]

The Torah codified it.

Where? It had to be before Moshe Rabbeinu for that is Rabbinic law and where the codification was founded. So, do you see your conundrum?

• Jewish identity: Determined matrilineally by the Rabbinic Period, formalized in Jewish law.
• Tribal identity: Remained patrilineal but had diminished relevance for most Jews by the 1st-2nd centuries CE.

 

[rosends]

Where? It had to be before Moshe Rabbeinu for that is Rabbinic law and where the codification was founded. So, do you see your conundrum?

• Jewish identity: Determined matrilineally by the Rabbinic Period, formalized in Jewish law.
• Tribal identity: Remained patrilineal but had diminished relevance for most Jews by the 1st-2nd centuries CE.

Your time line is off. Matrilineality is Sinaitic in revelation (though of course one could debate the authorial date of that event).

 

[Ropey]

Your time line is off. Matrilineality is Sinaitic in revelation

Revalation? I'll leave what's left of you for ding to chew on.

(though of course one could debate the authorial date of that event).

SO, no proof of anything.

/moving on

 

[rosends]

Revalation?

Um, yesm

I'll leave what's left of you for ding to chew on.



SO, no proof of anything.

/moving on

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/601092/jewish/Why-Is-Jewishness-Matrilineal.htm

 

[hobelim]

Revalation? I'll leave what's left of you for ding to chew on.

Ding is an unclean creature that does not ruminate, whose vile and loathsome flesh defiles and contaminates the mind

Not kosher.

 

[Ropey]

Ding is an unclean creature that does not ruminate. Not kosher.

Your post is trayf, so I conclude he's also taken you out.

Noice to know.

/moving on from you... as well

 

[Ropey]

Um, yesm

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/601092/jewish/Why-Is-Jewishness-Matrilineal.htm

Jesus was not a Jew. His father was G-d.

G-d is not a Jew. G-d has never been a Jew.

G-d created Jews, and everyone else.

For you to say that G-d was a Jew is to say that you are lost in fantasy.

And Chabad codifies nothing. Why does Chabad codify nothing?

Because Chabad is a philosophy.

 

[hobelim]

According to you there are no consequences because God has no power to do jack shit.

It may seem that way to you but I assure you it only seems that way...to you.

Anyone with eyes that see, ears that hear, and a mind that comprehends can see that you died and descended into the netherworld, the realm of the dead, in the very day you first set aside the Law of my God to worship a lifeless matzo made by human hands that you eat for spiritual life, derp, and are oblivious to the fact that you have been thrown into hell by the power of my God...

What has your almighty yet edible triune mangod done for you after decades of eating jack shit?

 

[hobelim]

Have you ever violated Leviticus 18:22?

I always do exactly as my God commands.

 

[rosends]

Jesus was not a Jew. His father was G-d.

G-d is not a Jew. G-d has never been a Jew.

G-d created Jews, and everyone else.

For you to say that G-d was a Jew is to say that you are lost in fantasy.

And Chabad codifies nothing. Why does Chabad codify nothing?

Because Chabad is a philosophy.

So I guess you missed the textual references. OK.

 

[Ropey]

So I guess

You are indeed guessing.

Go back to revelation. You need more.

 

[irosie91]

John the baptist certainly was close the Essene, as described here.

sorry DUDS----nothing your man said about that which is "not Judaism"
is true AT ALL. Including that which you call the communion ceremony
AND baptism. NOTHING