- Moderator
- #41
Which party would you support, if any?
I like the Green Party and Mountain Party on local levels.
Not sure it would work on a national level though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which party would you support, if any?
I like the Green Party and Mountain Party on local levels.
Not sure it would work on a national level though.
I like the Green Party and Mountain Party on local levels.
Not sure it would work on a national level though.
I never heard of the Mountain Party.
If the Greens got into power in America, they would just form into a coalition with the Democrats, and it would be as if the two were completely indistinguishable (like with the Green Parties in Europe).
I'm not sure - the Greens seem a lot more liberal then the Dems right now.
I'd like to see more parties in the action though.
I'm not sure - the Greens seem a lot more liberal then the Dems right now.
Whenever a third party gains traction, one of the major parties just steals some of their platform.
In multi-party systems, minor parties are forced to form a coalition with major parties, which ends up convolution their platform greatly. Nearly every country, even those with many parties in parliament, only have 1 or 2 parties with real influence.
I'd like to see more parties in the action though.
Not me. It would not solve anything and just make the political system more complicated.
I would like to vote for the party of 'fuck off!', but opting out of this savagery is not really an option. I demand nothing from the state, yet the state expects a portion of my labor, liberty, and entire freedom in return.
None, I'm a life long little i independent and I don't believe in parties. I prefer informed reasoned anarchism.
Are you saying you oppose rulers?
If not, then you are not an anarchist.
I do oppose rulers, we elect people to enact and enforce laws and rules agreed on by the society at large. We don't elect people to 'rule' us. That word is offensive.
I do oppose rulers, we elect people to enact and enforce laws and rules agreed on by the society at large. We don't elect people to 'rule' us. That word is offensive.
You just acknowledged three different types of rulers in that first sentence. It does not matter if the term rule offends you. You believe in rulers and that is the reality of what they are.
If you believe in having police enforce arbitrary laws over someone else, then you are ruling them. If you believe the majority has the right to decide what those laws are, then you just made the majority rulers. The very fact that you have created a political machine in the explanation of your "anarchist" beliefs, signifies that you have a machine ruling over man.
Come on man, you know that is bullshit. There have been hundreds of anarchists intellectuals that have written books and literature, and everyone of them would be ashamed by you, poser.
You seem to have some ax to grind. Try Ace Hardware, they have grinders.
I couldn't careless either way.
You seem to have some ax to grind. Try Ace Hardware, they have grinders.
I couldn't careless either way.
Obviously you do not care. Otherwise you would not of said something that astoundingly idiotic; In blatant disregard of 200 years of literature and philosophy.
It is the equivalent if I said I was a capitalist, and then told I believed in abolishing capital. That would make no fucking sense, moron.
Which party would you support, if any?
Which party would you support, if any?
Which party would you support, if any?